A Comparative Histological Study of the Tongue of Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Bat (Eidolon Helvum) and Pangolin (Manis Tricuspis)

This study assessed the micro anatomical differences in the tongue of rat, bat and pangolin with a view to establishing the functional anatomical differences of these mammalian tongues on their dietary pattern. Ten rats, ten bats and ten pangolins were used for this study. The animals were sacrifice...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abayomi,Taiwo A, Ofusori,David A, Ayoka,Oladele A, Odukoya,Samson A, Omotoso,Emmanuel O, Amegor,Frank O, Ajayi,Sunday A, Ojo,Gideon B, Oluwayinka,Oladele P
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía 2009
Materias:
Rat
Bat
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022009000400026
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0717-95022009000400026
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0717-950220090004000262010-05-18A Comparative Histological Study of the Tongue of Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Bat (Eidolon Helvum) and Pangolin (Manis Tricuspis)Abayomi,Taiwo AOfusori,David AAyoka,Oladele AOdukoya,Samson AOmotoso,Emmanuel OAmegor,Frank OAjayi,Sunday AOjo,Gideon BOluwayinka,Oladele P Rat Bat Pangolin Tongue Micro-anatomy This study assessed the micro anatomical differences in the tongue of rat, bat and pangolin with a view to establishing the functional anatomical differences of these mammalian tongues on their dietary pattern. Ten rats, ten bats and ten pangolins were used for this study. The animals were sacrificed and the tongue excised and processed for light microscopical study adopting the following stains: Haematoxylin Eosin, Verhoeff Gieson and Masson trichrome. The results showed non papillation of the keratinized stratified epithelium of pangolin tongue unlike the papillation seen in the tongue of the rat and bat. While the filiform papillation seen in the rat was bristle like, the filiform papillae in the bat were crown-like. There was also an unusual dense collagenous ring in the proximal portion of the pangolin tongue which was absent in other mammals. There were taste buds along the lateral walls of the vallate papillae in the distal portion of the tongue of rats and bats but none was found in the pangolins. In conclusion, the morphology of the tongues of these mammals showed a relationship between their feeding pattern and the adaptive changes in the microanatomy of their tongue.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Chilena de AnatomíaInternational Journal of Morphology v.27 n.4 20092009-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022009000400026en10.4067/S0717-95022009000400026
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Rat
Bat
Pangolin
Tongue
Micro-anatomy
spellingShingle Rat
Bat
Pangolin
Tongue
Micro-anatomy
Abayomi,Taiwo A
Ofusori,David A
Ayoka,Oladele A
Odukoya,Samson A
Omotoso,Emmanuel O
Amegor,Frank O
Ajayi,Sunday A
Ojo,Gideon B
Oluwayinka,Oladele P
A Comparative Histological Study of the Tongue of Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Bat (Eidolon Helvum) and Pangolin (Manis Tricuspis)
description This study assessed the micro anatomical differences in the tongue of rat, bat and pangolin with a view to establishing the functional anatomical differences of these mammalian tongues on their dietary pattern. Ten rats, ten bats and ten pangolins were used for this study. The animals were sacrificed and the tongue excised and processed for light microscopical study adopting the following stains: Haematoxylin Eosin, Verhoeff Gieson and Masson trichrome. The results showed non papillation of the keratinized stratified epithelium of pangolin tongue unlike the papillation seen in the tongue of the rat and bat. While the filiform papillation seen in the rat was bristle like, the filiform papillae in the bat were crown-like. There was also an unusual dense collagenous ring in the proximal portion of the pangolin tongue which was absent in other mammals. There were taste buds along the lateral walls of the vallate papillae in the distal portion of the tongue of rats and bats but none was found in the pangolins. In conclusion, the morphology of the tongues of these mammals showed a relationship between their feeding pattern and the adaptive changes in the microanatomy of their tongue.
author Abayomi,Taiwo A
Ofusori,David A
Ayoka,Oladele A
Odukoya,Samson A
Omotoso,Emmanuel O
Amegor,Frank O
Ajayi,Sunday A
Ojo,Gideon B
Oluwayinka,Oladele P
author_facet Abayomi,Taiwo A
Ofusori,David A
Ayoka,Oladele A
Odukoya,Samson A
Omotoso,Emmanuel O
Amegor,Frank O
Ajayi,Sunday A
Ojo,Gideon B
Oluwayinka,Oladele P
author_sort Abayomi,Taiwo A
title A Comparative Histological Study of the Tongue of Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Bat (Eidolon Helvum) and Pangolin (Manis Tricuspis)
title_short A Comparative Histological Study of the Tongue of Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Bat (Eidolon Helvum) and Pangolin (Manis Tricuspis)
title_full A Comparative Histological Study of the Tongue of Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Bat (Eidolon Helvum) and Pangolin (Manis Tricuspis)
title_fullStr A Comparative Histological Study of the Tongue of Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Bat (Eidolon Helvum) and Pangolin (Manis Tricuspis)
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Histological Study of the Tongue of Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Bat (Eidolon Helvum) and Pangolin (Manis Tricuspis)
title_sort comparative histological study of the tongue of rat (rattus norvegicus), bat (eidolon helvum) and pangolin (manis tricuspis)
publisher Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
publishDate 2009
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022009000400026
work_keys_str_mv AT abayomitaiwoa acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT ofusoridavida acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT ayokaoladelea acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT odukoyasamsona acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT omotosoemmanuelo acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT amegorfranko acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT ajayisundaya acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT ojogideonb acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT oluwayinkaoladelep acomparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT abayomitaiwoa comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT ofusoridavida comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT ayokaoladelea comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT odukoyasamsona comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT omotosoemmanuelo comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT amegorfranko comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT ajayisundaya comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT ojogideonb comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
AT oluwayinkaoladelep comparativehistologicalstudyofthetongueofratrattusnorvegicusbateidolonhelvumandpangolinmanistricuspis
_version_ 1718444674273771520