Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial Implant

Craniofacial implants are being increasingly used to treat patients with sequelae of oncological resections, trauma, and congenital deficiencies, among other issues. The aim of this investigation was to establish the minimum and maximum bone dimensions present in the most used places for the inserti...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Olate,Sergio, de Moraes,Paulo Hemerson, Caria,Paulo Henrique Ferreira, Netto,Henrique Duque de Miranda Chaves, Barbosa,José Ricardo de Albergaria
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía 2012
Materias:	Craniofacial implants Bone morphometry Extra-oral implant
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022012000300063
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0717-95022012000300063
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0717-950220120003000632013-02-20Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial ImplantOlate,Sergiode Moraes,Paulo HemersonCaria,Paulo Henrique FerreiraNetto,Henrique Duque de Miranda ChavesBarbosa,José Ricardo de Albergaria Craniofacial implants Bone morphometry Extra-oral implant Craniofacial implants are being increasingly used to treat patients with sequelae of oncological resections, trauma, and congenital deficiencies, among other issues. The aim of this investigation was to establish the minimum and maximum bone dimensions present in the most used places for the insertion of craniofacial implants. A descriptive study was designed analyzing 40 human skulls using cone-beam computed tomography; in the volumetric reconstruction the points most often used in clinical investigations for the insertion of implants were selected, representing the orbital, perinasal, zygomatic bone and periauricular regions, measuring the distance between the cortical bones on the sagittal, axial and coronal planes; comparisons between gender and with other investigations with a similar aim were also made. In the supraorbital area, values of 7.92±1.82 mm were found and in the lateral area values of 7.54±0.98 mm, allowing the placement of implants 5 or 6 mm in length. In the area of the zygomatic bone, dimensions of 10.4±2.35 mm were obtained, allowing the placement of implants 8 mm in length. In the periauricular area values were obtained of 2.93±0.55 mm in the superior region and 3.1±0.7 mm in the inferior region, whereas in the perinasal area implants 4 mm in length can be placed. We concluded that the craniomaxillofacial bone structure presents acceptable widths for the installation of implants; the periauricular region presents lower dimensions, with the possibility of intracranial communication in areas above the external auditory meatus.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Chilena de AnatomíaInternational Journal of Morphology v.30 n.3 20122012-09-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022012000300063en10.4067/S0717-95022012000300063
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
topic	Craniofacial implants Bone morphometry Extra-oral implant
spellingShingle	Craniofacial implants Bone morphometry Extra-oral implant Olate,Sergio de Moraes,Paulo Hemerson Caria,Paulo Henrique Ferreira Netto,Henrique Duque de Miranda Chaves Barbosa,José Ricardo de Albergaria Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial Implant
description	Craniofacial implants are being increasingly used to treat patients with sequelae of oncological resections, trauma, and congenital deficiencies, among other issues. The aim of this investigation was to establish the minimum and maximum bone dimensions present in the most used places for the insertion of craniofacial implants. A descriptive study was designed analyzing 40 human skulls using cone-beam computed tomography; in the volumetric reconstruction the points most often used in clinical investigations for the insertion of implants were selected, representing the orbital, perinasal, zygomatic bone and periauricular regions, measuring the distance between the cortical bones on the sagittal, axial and coronal planes; comparisons between gender and with other investigations with a similar aim were also made. In the supraorbital area, values of 7.92±1.82 mm were found and in the lateral area values of 7.54±0.98 mm, allowing the placement of implants 5 or 6 mm in length. In the area of the zygomatic bone, dimensions of 10.4±2.35 mm were obtained, allowing the placement of implants 8 mm in length. In the periauricular area values were obtained of 2.93±0.55 mm in the superior region and 3.1±0.7 mm in the inferior region, whereas in the perinasal area implants 4 mm in length can be placed. We concluded that the craniomaxillofacial bone structure presents acceptable widths for the installation of implants; the periauricular region presents lower dimensions, with the possibility of intracranial communication in areas above the external auditory meatus.
author	Olate,Sergio de Moraes,Paulo Hemerson Caria,Paulo Henrique Ferreira Netto,Henrique Duque de Miranda Chaves Barbosa,José Ricardo de Albergaria
author_facet	Olate,Sergio de Moraes,Paulo Hemerson Caria,Paulo Henrique Ferreira Netto,Henrique Duque de Miranda Chaves Barbosa,José Ricardo de Albergaria
author_sort	Olate,Sergio
title	Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial Implant
title_short	Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial Implant
title_full	Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial Implant
title_fullStr	Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial Implant
title_full_unstemmed	Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial Implant
title_sort	craniofacial morphometry for craniofacial implant
publisher	Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
publishDate	2012
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022012000300063
work_keys_str_mv	AT olatesergio craniofacialmorphometryforcraniofacialimplant AT demoraespaulohemerson craniofacialmorphometryforcraniofacialimplant AT cariapaulohenriqueferreira craniofacialmorphometryforcraniofacialimplant AT nettohenriqueduquedemirandachaves craniofacialmorphometryforcraniofacialimplant AT barbosajosericardodealbergaria craniofacialmorphometryforcraniofacialimplant
_version_	1718444798051876864

Craniofacial Morphometry for Craniofacial Implant

Ejemplares similares