Estrogen Receptors in Immunohistochemically Stained Slides: Comparing Subjective and Computerized Evaluation Methods

Immunohistochemistry is a specific and sensitive staining method for detection of several proteins. One important function of this method is to help us on the diagnosis of the presence of specific receptors as the estrogen receptors. The aim of this study was to compare two different methods to eval...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Millas,Ieda, Barros,Mirna Duarte, Curcio,Daniella Franco, Buck,Hudson Sousa, Liquidato,Bianca Maria
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022014000400007
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0717-95022014000400007
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0717-950220140004000072015-11-16Estrogen Receptors in Immunohistochemically Stained Slides: Comparing Subjective and Computerized Evaluation MethodsMillas,IedaBarros,Mirna DuarteCurcio,Daniella FrancoBuck,Hudson SousaLiquidato,Bianca Maria Immunohistochemistry Estrogen receptors Methods Microscopy Immunohistochemistry is a specific and sensitive staining method for detection of several proteins. One important function of this method is to help us on the diagnosis of the presence of specific receptors as the estrogen receptors. The aim of this study was to compare two different methods to evaluate immunohistochemical staining intensity to detect the presence of ER in the nasal mucosa tissue: one using a digital system and the other through conventional direct microscopy observation. Sixty two stained samples were observed and analyzed under optic microscopy by three specialized professionals, who have graded intensity from: absent, mild, moderate and intense staining. Afterwards, an objective measurement was obtained by a relative optical density (ROD) reading, through the MCID 7.0 system of densitometric digital analysis (Inter Focus Imaging LTDA, Linton, England). Subjective and objective classifications were compared under statistical analysis (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Spearman Correlation Test, p<0.05). We found a positive correlation between the subjective findings of observers and digital analysis in all the categories of beta receptor. For the alpha receptor, there was a correlation only in extreme categories. The subjective evaluations by observers and digital method by measuring the relative optical density show statistically significant correlations in quantifying the estrogen receptors by immunohistochemistry staining. This indicates that both methods show accuracy for the proposed study.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Chilena de AnatomíaInternational Journal of Morphology v.32 n.4 20142014-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022014000400007en10.4067/S0717-95022014000400007
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Immunohistochemistry
Estrogen receptors
Methods
Microscopy
spellingShingle Immunohistochemistry
Estrogen receptors
Methods
Microscopy
Millas,Ieda
Barros,Mirna Duarte
Curcio,Daniella Franco
Buck,Hudson Sousa
Liquidato,Bianca Maria
Estrogen Receptors in Immunohistochemically Stained Slides: Comparing Subjective and Computerized Evaluation Methods
description Immunohistochemistry is a specific and sensitive staining method for detection of several proteins. One important function of this method is to help us on the diagnosis of the presence of specific receptors as the estrogen receptors. The aim of this study was to compare two different methods to evaluate immunohistochemical staining intensity to detect the presence of ER in the nasal mucosa tissue: one using a digital system and the other through conventional direct microscopy observation. Sixty two stained samples were observed and analyzed under optic microscopy by three specialized professionals, who have graded intensity from: absent, mild, moderate and intense staining. Afterwards, an objective measurement was obtained by a relative optical density (ROD) reading, through the MCID 7.0 system of densitometric digital analysis (Inter Focus Imaging LTDA, Linton, England). Subjective and objective classifications were compared under statistical analysis (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Spearman Correlation Test, p<0.05). We found a positive correlation between the subjective findings of observers and digital analysis in all the categories of beta receptor. For the alpha receptor, there was a correlation only in extreme categories. The subjective evaluations by observers and digital method by measuring the relative optical density show statistically significant correlations in quantifying the estrogen receptors by immunohistochemistry staining. This indicates that both methods show accuracy for the proposed study.
author Millas,Ieda
Barros,Mirna Duarte
Curcio,Daniella Franco
Buck,Hudson Sousa
Liquidato,Bianca Maria
author_facet Millas,Ieda
Barros,Mirna Duarte
Curcio,Daniella Franco
Buck,Hudson Sousa
Liquidato,Bianca Maria
author_sort Millas,Ieda
title Estrogen Receptors in Immunohistochemically Stained Slides: Comparing Subjective and Computerized Evaluation Methods
title_short Estrogen Receptors in Immunohistochemically Stained Slides: Comparing Subjective and Computerized Evaluation Methods
title_full Estrogen Receptors in Immunohistochemically Stained Slides: Comparing Subjective and Computerized Evaluation Methods
title_fullStr Estrogen Receptors in Immunohistochemically Stained Slides: Comparing Subjective and Computerized Evaluation Methods
title_full_unstemmed Estrogen Receptors in Immunohistochemically Stained Slides: Comparing Subjective and Computerized Evaluation Methods
title_sort estrogen receptors in immunohistochemically stained slides: comparing subjective and computerized evaluation methods
publisher Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022014000400007
work_keys_str_mv AT millasieda estrogenreceptorsinimmunohistochemicallystainedslidescomparingsubjectiveandcomputerizedevaluationmethods
AT barrosmirnaduarte estrogenreceptorsinimmunohistochemicallystainedslidescomparingsubjectiveandcomputerizedevaluationmethods
AT curciodaniellafranco estrogenreceptorsinimmunohistochemicallystainedslidescomparingsubjectiveandcomputerizedevaluationmethods
AT buckhudsonsousa estrogenreceptorsinimmunohistochemicallystainedslidescomparingsubjectiveandcomputerizedevaluationmethods
AT liquidatobiancamaria estrogenreceptorsinimmunohistochemicallystainedslidescomparingsubjectiveandcomputerizedevaluationmethods
_version_ 1718444889106022400