Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Globally, the assessment of methodological quality (MQ) in biomedical research is an area of dynamic development over recent years. Understood as a complex and multidimensional construct, various groups have proposed tools for its assessment. Our team has designed and validated scales to assess MQ o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manterola,Carlos, Cartes-Velasquez,Ricardo, Otzen,Tamara
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022016000100012
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0717-95022016000100012
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0717-950220160001000122016-05-02Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesManterola,CarlosCartes-Velasquez,RicardoOtzen,Tamara Investigative Techniques Methods/epidemiology methodological studies Diagnosis Diagnostic tests Reproducibility of Results Evaluation Studies as Topic Epidemiological Studies Evidence-Based Medicine Globally, the assessment of methodological quality (MQ) in biomedical research is an area of dynamic development over recent years. Understood as a complex and multidimensional construct, various groups have proposed tools for its assessment. Our team has designed and validated scales to assess MQ of therapy and prognosis studies. However, as with other instruments, it is necessary to specify in detail how it is applied, in such a way as to be able to standardize the measurements made with this instrument. A detailed description is presented of the 3 domains (type of research design [single item domain], size of population studied [single item domain], and methodology 7 items) and 9 items comprising the scale, specifying for each item how to assess the characteristics and score articles of diagnostic accuracy studies. The application of this instrument requires critical evaluation of each of the items to assign the respective score, which sum to give a total score of between 9 and 45 points. The cut-off point to define the construct MQ (dichotomous) for this type of study is 20 points. This article provides an application guideline that may help to improve inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the MInCir MQ scale for diagnostic accuracy studies. The aim of this article is to provide a guideline for the standardized application of the MInCir MQ scale for diagnostic accuracy studies.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Chilena de AnatomíaInternational Journal of Morphology v.34 n.1 20162016-03-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022016000100012en10.4067/S0717-95022016000100012
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Investigative Techniques
Methods/epidemiology
methodological studies
Diagnosis
Diagnostic tests
Reproducibility of Results
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Epidemiological Studies
Evidence-Based Medicine
spellingShingle Investigative Techniques
Methods/epidemiology
methodological studies
Diagnosis
Diagnostic tests
Reproducibility of Results
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Epidemiological Studies
Evidence-Based Medicine
Manterola,Carlos
Cartes-Velasquez,Ricardo
Otzen,Tamara
Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
description Globally, the assessment of methodological quality (MQ) in biomedical research is an area of dynamic development over recent years. Understood as a complex and multidimensional construct, various groups have proposed tools for its assessment. Our team has designed and validated scales to assess MQ of therapy and prognosis studies. However, as with other instruments, it is necessary to specify in detail how it is applied, in such a way as to be able to standardize the measurements made with this instrument. A detailed description is presented of the 3 domains (type of research design [single item domain], size of population studied [single item domain], and methodology 7 items) and 9 items comprising the scale, specifying for each item how to assess the characteristics and score articles of diagnostic accuracy studies. The application of this instrument requires critical evaluation of each of the items to assign the respective score, which sum to give a total score of between 9 and 45 points. The cut-off point to define the construct MQ (dichotomous) for this type of study is 20 points. This article provides an application guideline that may help to improve inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the MInCir MQ scale for diagnostic accuracy studies. The aim of this article is to provide a guideline for the standardized application of the MInCir MQ scale for diagnostic accuracy studies.
author Manterola,Carlos
Cartes-Velasquez,Ricardo
Otzen,Tamara
author_facet Manterola,Carlos
Cartes-Velasquez,Ricardo
Otzen,Tamara
author_sort Manterola,Carlos
title Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_short Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_full Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_fullStr Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_full_unstemmed Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_sort instructions for using the mincir scale to assess methodological quality in diagnostic accuracy studies
publisher Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
publishDate 2016
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022016000100012
work_keys_str_mv AT manterolacarlos instructionsforusingthemincirscaletoassessmethodologicalqualityindiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT cartesvelasquezricardo instructionsforusingthemincirscaletoassessmethodologicalqualityindiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT otzentamara instructionsforusingthemincirscaletoassessmethodologicalqualityindiagnosticaccuracystudies
_version_ 1718444946858442752