Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months

The aim of this study is to compare the bone formation in maxillary sinus lift with an autogenous bone graft in histological evaluation at 2 or 6 months. A comparative study was designed where 10 patients with missing teeth bilaterally in the posterior zone of the maxilla were selected. Patients rec...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Duque Netto,Henrique, Miranda Chaves,Maria das Graças Alfonso, Aatrstrup,Beatriz, Guerra,Renata, Olate,Sergio
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía 2016
Materias:	Maxillary sinus Maxillary sinus lift Autogenous graft
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022016000300041
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0717-95022016000300041
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0717-950220160003000412016-11-17Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 MonthsDuque Netto,HenriqueMiranda Chaves,Maria das Graças AlfonsoAatrstrup,BeatrizGuerra,RenataOlate,Sergio Maxillary sinus Maxillary sinus lift Autogenous graft The aim of this study is to compare the bone formation in maxillary sinus lift with an autogenous bone graft in histological evaluation at 2 or 6 months. A comparative study was designed where 10 patients with missing teeth bilaterally in the posterior zone of the maxilla were selected. Patients received a particulate autogenous bone graft under the same surgical conditions, selecting a site to collect a biopsy and histological study at two months and another at six months postoperatively. Histomorphometry was performed and were used Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, student's t-test and Spearman's correlation coefficient, considering a value of p<0.05. Differences were observed in inflammatory infiltrate and vascularization characteristics; however, the group analyzed at two months presented 38.12% ± 6.64 % of mineralized tissue, whereas the group studied at 6 months presented an average of 38.45 ± 9.27 %. There were no statistical differences between the groups. It is concluded that the bone formation may be similar in intrasinus particulate autogenous bone grafts in evaluations at two or six months; under these conditions, early installation of implants is viable.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Chilena de AnatomíaInternational Journal of Morphology v.34 n.3 20162016-09-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022016000300041en10.4067/S0717-95022016000300041
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
topic	Maxillary sinus Maxillary sinus lift Autogenous graft
spellingShingle	Maxillary sinus Maxillary sinus lift Autogenous graft Duque Netto,Henrique Miranda Chaves,Maria das Graças Alfonso Aatrstrup,Beatriz Guerra,Renata Olate,Sergio Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months
description	The aim of this study is to compare the bone formation in maxillary sinus lift with an autogenous bone graft in histological evaluation at 2 or 6 months. A comparative study was designed where 10 patients with missing teeth bilaterally in the posterior zone of the maxilla were selected. Patients received a particulate autogenous bone graft under the same surgical conditions, selecting a site to collect a biopsy and histological study at two months and another at six months postoperatively. Histomorphometry was performed and were used Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, student's t-test and Spearman's correlation coefficient, considering a value of p<0.05. Differences were observed in inflammatory infiltrate and vascularization characteristics; however, the group analyzed at two months presented 38.12% ± 6.64 % of mineralized tissue, whereas the group studied at 6 months presented an average of 38.45 ± 9.27 %. There were no statistical differences between the groups. It is concluded that the bone formation may be similar in intrasinus particulate autogenous bone grafts in evaluations at two or six months; under these conditions, early installation of implants is viable.
author	Duque Netto,Henrique Miranda Chaves,Maria das Graças Alfonso Aatrstrup,Beatriz Guerra,Renata Olate,Sergio
author_facet	Duque Netto,Henrique Miranda Chaves,Maria das Graças Alfonso Aatrstrup,Beatriz Guerra,Renata Olate,Sergio
author_sort	Duque Netto,Henrique
title	Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months
title_short	Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months
title_full	Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months
title_fullStr	Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months
title_full_unstemmed	Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months
title_sort	bone formation in maxillary sinus lift using autogenous bone graft at 2 and 6 months
publisher	Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
publishDate	2016
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022016000300041
work_keys_str_mv	AT duquenettohenrique boneformationinmaxillarysinusliftusingautogenousbonegraftat2and6months AT mirandachavesmariadasgracasalfonso boneformationinmaxillarysinusliftusingautogenousbonegraftat2and6months AT aatrstrupbeatriz boneformationinmaxillarysinusliftusingautogenousbonegraftat2and6months AT guerrarenata boneformationinmaxillarysinusliftusingautogenousbonegraftat2and6months AT olatesergio boneformationinmaxillarysinusliftusingautogenousbonegraftat2and6months
_version_	1718444973965180928

Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months

Ejemplares similares