Which Method is Gold Standard for Determination of Thyroid Volume?

Change of the thyroid gland volume is often the symptom of most common pathological conditions some thyroid diseases. The exact calculation for the thyroid volume is very important for the assessment and management of thyroid disorders. The volume of thyroid gland, using computed tomography (CT), ul...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erçikti,Nurcan, Acer,Niyazi, Apaydi,Nihal, Güven,Inanç, Zararsiz,Gökmen
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022017000200011
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0717-95022017000200011
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0717-950220170002000112017-08-07Which Method is Gold Standard for Determination of Thyroid Volume?Erçikti,NurcanAcer,NiyaziApaydi,NihalGüven,InançZararsiz,Gökmen Thyroid volume Actual volume Correction factor Stereology Change of the thyroid gland volume is often the symptom of most common pathological conditions some thyroid diseases. The exact calculation for the thyroid volume is very important for the assessment and management of thyroid disorders. The volume of thyroid gland, using computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been accessed in few studies published; however a gold standard method has not yet been determined. The purpose of this study was to estimate the volume of normal thyroid gland to define an optimal correction factor therefore was to compare different techniques using the CT. We used computed tomography images obtained from 8 cadavers (2 females, 6 males) to calculate the thyroid volumes. In the present study, the actual thyroid volumes were measured using the water-displacement method as a gold standard, point-counting as a stereology, and ellipsoid methods. Mean squared errors and correction factors were calculated and modeled for each model to find an optimal correction factor and from 0.450 to 0.600 in steps of 0.001 separately for thyroid volume estimation. The average volume of the thyroid glands were 14.58 ± 9.84, 15.28 ± 9.38, and 14.97 ± 8.35 cm3 by fluid displacement, stereology and ellipsoid formula, respectively. No significant difference was found among the methods (P >0.05). The results of this study suggested that the volume of thyroid gland can be measured on CT scans stereologically for diagnosis, as will as provide reliable measure of thyroid volume, management and follow-up of thyroid diseases and for preoperative planning.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Chilena de AnatomíaInternational Journal of Morphology v.35 n.2 20172017-06-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022017000200011en10.4067/S0717-95022017000200011
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Thyroid volume
Actual volume
Correction factor
Stereology
spellingShingle Thyroid volume
Actual volume
Correction factor
Stereology
Erçikti,Nurcan
Acer,Niyazi
Apaydi,Nihal
Güven,Inanç
Zararsiz,Gökmen
Which Method is Gold Standard for Determination of Thyroid Volume?
description Change of the thyroid gland volume is often the symptom of most common pathological conditions some thyroid diseases. The exact calculation for the thyroid volume is very important for the assessment and management of thyroid disorders. The volume of thyroid gland, using computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been accessed in few studies published; however a gold standard method has not yet been determined. The purpose of this study was to estimate the volume of normal thyroid gland to define an optimal correction factor therefore was to compare different techniques using the CT. We used computed tomography images obtained from 8 cadavers (2 females, 6 males) to calculate the thyroid volumes. In the present study, the actual thyroid volumes were measured using the water-displacement method as a gold standard, point-counting as a stereology, and ellipsoid methods. Mean squared errors and correction factors were calculated and modeled for each model to find an optimal correction factor and from 0.450 to 0.600 in steps of 0.001 separately for thyroid volume estimation. The average volume of the thyroid glands were 14.58 ± 9.84, 15.28 ± 9.38, and 14.97 ± 8.35 cm3 by fluid displacement, stereology and ellipsoid formula, respectively. No significant difference was found among the methods (P >0.05). The results of this study suggested that the volume of thyroid gland can be measured on CT scans stereologically for diagnosis, as will as provide reliable measure of thyroid volume, management and follow-up of thyroid diseases and for preoperative planning.
author Erçikti,Nurcan
Acer,Niyazi
Apaydi,Nihal
Güven,Inanç
Zararsiz,Gökmen
author_facet Erçikti,Nurcan
Acer,Niyazi
Apaydi,Nihal
Güven,Inanç
Zararsiz,Gökmen
author_sort Erçikti,Nurcan
title Which Method is Gold Standard for Determination of Thyroid Volume?
title_short Which Method is Gold Standard for Determination of Thyroid Volume?
title_full Which Method is Gold Standard for Determination of Thyroid Volume?
title_fullStr Which Method is Gold Standard for Determination of Thyroid Volume?
title_full_unstemmed Which Method is Gold Standard for Determination of Thyroid Volume?
title_sort which method is gold standard for determination of thyroid volume?
publisher Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
publishDate 2017
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022017000200011
work_keys_str_mv AT erciktinurcan whichmethodisgoldstandardfordeterminationofthyroidvolume
AT acerniyazi whichmethodisgoldstandardfordeterminationofthyroidvolume
AT apaydinihal whichmethodisgoldstandardfordeterminationofthyroidvolume
AT guveninanc whichmethodisgoldstandardfordeterminationofthyroidvolume
AT zararsizgokmen whichmethodisgoldstandardfordeterminationofthyroidvolume
_version_ 1718445000298070016