Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation

Abstract Writing a thesis involves complying with certain rules and requirements established by institutional guides of universities. Students, often being too inexperienced to create good written documents, have guidelines to follow when developing their first drafts. This study seeks to help stude...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González-López,Samuel, López López,Aurelio
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Instituto de Literatura y Ciencias del Lenguaje 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-09342020000300643
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-09342020000300643
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-093420200003006432020-12-15Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and SpeculationGonzález-López,SamuelLópez López,Aurelio Natural language processing educational data mining automated text evaluation goal connectedness thesis assessment Abstract Writing a thesis involves complying with certain rules and requirements established by institutional guides of universities. Students, often being too inexperienced to create good written documents, have guidelines to follow when developing their first drafts. This study seeks to help students improve their first writings, based on natural language processing techniques. We focus primarily on the conclusion section of a thesis, a central element when completing a research project. In this paper, a conclusion analyzer that includes three models: goal connectedness, judgment and speculation is presented. Such subsystems try to evaluate the main expected features in conclusions, specifically the connectedness with the general objective, the evidence of value judgments, and the presence of future work as a result of the student’s reflection. In the study, we provide initial models, internal exploration of conclusions, and evaluations of our approach. We found across the three features evaluated that graduate level student texts outperformed those of undergraduate level. The behavior provides evidence, that students with more practice in writing a scientific paper or thesis (at the graduate level), have better writing skills.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Instituto de Literatura y Ciencias del LenguajeRevista signos v.53 n.104 20202020-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-09342020000300643en10.4067/S0718-09342020000300643
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Natural language processing
educational data mining
automated text evaluation
goal connectedness
thesis assessment
spellingShingle Natural language processing
educational data mining
automated text evaluation
goal connectedness
thesis assessment
González-López,Samuel
López López,Aurelio
Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation
description Abstract Writing a thesis involves complying with certain rules and requirements established by institutional guides of universities. Students, often being too inexperienced to create good written documents, have guidelines to follow when developing their first drafts. This study seeks to help students improve their first writings, based on natural language processing techniques. We focus primarily on the conclusion section of a thesis, a central element when completing a research project. In this paper, a conclusion analyzer that includes three models: goal connectedness, judgment and speculation is presented. Such subsystems try to evaluate the main expected features in conclusions, specifically the connectedness with the general objective, the evidence of value judgments, and the presence of future work as a result of the student’s reflection. In the study, we provide initial models, internal exploration of conclusions, and evaluations of our approach. We found across the three features evaluated that graduate level student texts outperformed those of undergraduate level. The behavior provides evidence, that students with more practice in writing a scientific paper or thesis (at the graduate level), have better writing skills.
author González-López,Samuel
López López,Aurelio
author_facet González-López,Samuel
López López,Aurelio
author_sort González-López,Samuel
title Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation
title_short Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation
title_full Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation
title_fullStr Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation
title_sort assessing thesis conclusions by their connectedness with goal, judgment and speculation
publisher Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Instituto de Literatura y Ciencias del Lenguaje
publishDate 2020
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-09342020000300643
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezlopezsamuel assessingthesisconclusionsbytheirconnectednesswithgoaljudgmentandspeculation
AT lopezlopezaurelio assessingthesisconclusionsbytheirconnectednesswithgoaljudgmentandspeculation
_version_ 1714201874009161728