Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation
Abstract Writing a thesis involves complying with certain rules and requirements established by institutional guides of universities. Students, often being too inexperienced to create good written documents, have guidelines to follow when developing their first drafts. This study seeks to help stude...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Instituto de Literatura y Ciencias del Lenguaje
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-09342020000300643 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0718-09342020000300643 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0718-093420200003006432020-12-15Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and SpeculationGonzález-López,SamuelLópez López,Aurelio Natural language processing educational data mining automated text evaluation goal connectedness thesis assessment Abstract Writing a thesis involves complying with certain rules and requirements established by institutional guides of universities. Students, often being too inexperienced to create good written documents, have guidelines to follow when developing their first drafts. This study seeks to help students improve their first writings, based on natural language processing techniques. We focus primarily on the conclusion section of a thesis, a central element when completing a research project. In this paper, a conclusion analyzer that includes three models: goal connectedness, judgment and speculation is presented. Such subsystems try to evaluate the main expected features in conclusions, specifically the connectedness with the general objective, the evidence of value judgments, and the presence of future work as a result of the student’s reflection. In the study, we provide initial models, internal exploration of conclusions, and evaluations of our approach. We found across the three features evaluated that graduate level student texts outperformed those of undergraduate level. The behavior provides evidence, that students with more practice in writing a scientific paper or thesis (at the graduate level), have better writing skills.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Instituto de Literatura y Ciencias del LenguajeRevista signos v.53 n.104 20202020-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-09342020000300643en10.4067/S0718-09342020000300643 |
institution |
Scielo Chile |
collection |
Scielo Chile |
language |
English |
topic |
Natural language processing educational data mining automated text evaluation goal connectedness thesis assessment |
spellingShingle |
Natural language processing educational data mining automated text evaluation goal connectedness thesis assessment González-López,Samuel López López,Aurelio Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation |
description |
Abstract Writing a thesis involves complying with certain rules and requirements established by institutional guides of universities. Students, often being too inexperienced to create good written documents, have guidelines to follow when developing their first drafts. This study seeks to help students improve their first writings, based on natural language processing techniques. We focus primarily on the conclusion section of a thesis, a central element when completing a research project. In this paper, a conclusion analyzer that includes three models: goal connectedness, judgment and speculation is presented. Such subsystems try to evaluate the main expected features in conclusions, specifically the connectedness with the general objective, the evidence of value judgments, and the presence of future work as a result of the student’s reflection. In the study, we provide initial models, internal exploration of conclusions, and evaluations of our approach. We found across the three features evaluated that graduate level student texts outperformed those of undergraduate level. The behavior provides evidence, that students with more practice in writing a scientific paper or thesis (at the graduate level), have better writing skills. |
author |
González-López,Samuel López López,Aurelio |
author_facet |
González-López,Samuel López López,Aurelio |
author_sort |
González-López,Samuel |
title |
Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation |
title_short |
Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation |
title_full |
Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation |
title_fullStr |
Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing Thesis Conclusions by their Connectedness with Goal, Judgment and Speculation |
title_sort |
assessing thesis conclusions by their connectedness with goal, judgment and speculation |
publisher |
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Instituto de Literatura y Ciencias del Lenguaje |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-09342020000300643 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gonzalezlopezsamuel assessingthesisconclusionsbytheirconnectednesswithgoaljudgmentandspeculation AT lopezlopezaurelio assessingthesisconclusionsbytheirconnectednesswithgoaljudgmentandspeculation |
_version_ |
1714201874009161728 |