Labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration project

Monetary contributions might not be appropriate welfare measures in contingent valuation (CV) when household incomes are very low. In such cases, willingness to pay (WTP) is restricted by a household's ability to reduce its consumption of other goods to pay for the environmental good under valu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schiappacasse,Ignacio, Vásquez,Felipe, Nahuelhual,Laura, Echeverría,Cristian
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-16202013000100006
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-16202013000100006
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-162020130001000062014-09-08Labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration projectSchiappacasse,IgnacioVásquez,FelipeNahuelhual,LauraEcheverría,Cristian cost-benefit analysis contingent valuation ecosystem services labor payments Monetary contributions might not be appropriate welfare measures in contingent valuation (CV) when household incomes are very low. In such cases, willingness to pay (WTP) is restricted by a household's ability to reduce its consumption of other goods to pay for the environmental good under valuation. Beneficiaries, however, may be willing to contribute their time to work on a project instead of paying money. In this context, we assess the benefits of ecosystem services restoration in a rural area of high conservation value in central Chile, using a CV study that includes two WTP questions, one for cash and another for labor payments. The results indicate that labor payments in the form of a number of working hours per week were highly accepted among people. In fact, in our sample, more people were willing to pay with labor time than with traditional cash payments. When we analyze the economic efficiency of the restoration project considering only cash payments, the net present value (NPV) is negative (-US$ 255,834), but when we consider the value of time payments, the NPV is US$629,980. The results indicate that this approach ought to be seriously considered in contingent valuation in similar social and economic contexts.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería ForestalCiencia e investigación agraria v.40 n.1 20132013-04-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-16202013000100006en10.4067/S0718-16202013000100006
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic cost-benefit analysis
contingent valuation
ecosystem services
labor payments
spellingShingle cost-benefit analysis
contingent valuation
ecosystem services
labor payments
Schiappacasse,Ignacio
Vásquez,Felipe
Nahuelhual,Laura
Echeverría,Cristian
Labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration project
description Monetary contributions might not be appropriate welfare measures in contingent valuation (CV) when household incomes are very low. In such cases, willingness to pay (WTP) is restricted by a household's ability to reduce its consumption of other goods to pay for the environmental good under valuation. Beneficiaries, however, may be willing to contribute their time to work on a project instead of paying money. In this context, we assess the benefits of ecosystem services restoration in a rural area of high conservation value in central Chile, using a CV study that includes two WTP questions, one for cash and another for labor payments. The results indicate that labor payments in the form of a number of working hours per week were highly accepted among people. In fact, in our sample, more people were willing to pay with labor time than with traditional cash payments. When we analyze the economic efficiency of the restoration project considering only cash payments, the net present value (NPV) is negative (-US$ 255,834), but when we consider the value of time payments, the NPV is US$629,980. The results indicate that this approach ought to be seriously considered in contingent valuation in similar social and economic contexts.
author Schiappacasse,Ignacio
Vásquez,Felipe
Nahuelhual,Laura
Echeverría,Cristian
author_facet Schiappacasse,Ignacio
Vásquez,Felipe
Nahuelhual,Laura
Echeverría,Cristian
author_sort Schiappacasse,Ignacio
title Labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration project
title_short Labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration project
title_full Labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration project
title_fullStr Labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration project
title_full_unstemmed Labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration project
title_sort labor as a welfare measure in contingent valuation: the value of a forest restoration project
publisher Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal
publishDate 2013
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-16202013000100006
work_keys_str_mv AT schiappacasseignacio laborasawelfaremeasureincontingentvaluationthevalueofaforestrestorationproject
AT vasquezfelipe laborasawelfaremeasureincontingentvaluationthevalueofaforestrestorationproject
AT nahuelhuallaura laborasawelfaremeasureincontingentvaluationthevalueofaforestrestorationproject
AT echeverriacristian laborasawelfaremeasureincontingentvaluationthevalueofaforestrestorationproject
_version_ 1714202145776992256