Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust

While Open Data initiatives are diverse, they aim to create and contribute to public value. Yet several potential contradictions exist between public values, such as trust, transparency, privacy, and security, and Open Data policies. To bridge these contradictions, we present the notion of precommit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Meijer,Ronald, Conradie,Peter, Choenni,Sunil
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Universidad de Talca 2014
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-18762014000300004
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0718-18762014000300004
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0718-187620140003000042018-10-12Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and TrustMeijer,RonaldConradie,PeterChoenni,Sunil While Open Data initiatives are diverse, they aim to create and contribute to public value. Yet several potential contradictions exist between public values, such as trust, transparency, privacy, and security, and Open Data policies. To bridge these contradictions, we present the notion of precommitment as a restriction of one’s choices. Conceptualized as a policy instrument, precommitment can be applied by an organization to restrict the extent to which an Open Data policy might conflict with public values. To illustrate the use of precommitment, we present two case studies at two public sector organizations, where precommitment is applied during a data request procedure to reconcile conflicting values. In this procedure, precommitment is operationalized in three phases. In the first phase, restrictions are defined on the type and the content of the data that might be requested. The second phase involves the preparation of the data to be delivered according to legal requirements and the decisions taken in phase 1. Data preparation includes amongst others the deletion of privacy sensitive or other problematic attributes. Finally, phase 3 pertains to the establishment of the conditions of reuse of the data, limiting the use to restricted user groups or opening the data for everyone.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de TalcaJournal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research v.9 n.3 20142014-09-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-18762014000300004en10.4067/S0718-18762014000300004
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
description	While Open Data initiatives are diverse, they aim to create and contribute to public value. Yet several potential contradictions exist between public values, such as trust, transparency, privacy, and security, and Open Data policies. To bridge these contradictions, we present the notion of precommitment as a restriction of one’s choices. Conceptualized as a policy instrument, precommitment can be applied by an organization to restrict the extent to which an Open Data policy might conflict with public values. To illustrate the use of precommitment, we present two case studies at two public sector organizations, where precommitment is applied during a data request procedure to reconcile conflicting values. In this procedure, precommitment is operationalized in three phases. In the first phase, restrictions are defined on the type and the content of the data that might be requested. The second phase involves the preparation of the data to be delivered according to legal requirements and the decisions taken in phase 1. Data preparation includes amongst others the deletion of privacy sensitive or other problematic attributes. Finally, phase 3 pertains to the establishment of the conditions of reuse of the data, limiting the use to restricted user groups or opening the data for everyone.
author	Meijer,Ronald Conradie,Peter Choenni,Sunil
spellingShingle	Meijer,Ronald Conradie,Peter Choenni,Sunil Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust
author_facet	Meijer,Ronald Conradie,Peter Choenni,Sunil
author_sort	Meijer,Ronald
title	Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust
title_short	Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust
title_full	Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust
title_fullStr	Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust
title_full_unstemmed	Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust
title_sort	reconciling contradictions of open data regarding transparency, privacy, security and trust
publisher	Universidad de Talca
publishDate	2014
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-18762014000300004
work_keys_str_mv	AT meijerronald reconcilingcontradictionsofopendataregardingtransparencyprivacysecurityandtrust AT conradiepeter reconcilingcontradictionsofopendataregardingtransparencyprivacysecurityandtrust AT choennisunil reconcilingcontradictionsofopendataregardingtransparencyprivacysecurityandtrust
_version_	1714202217569845248

Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust

Ejemplares similares