Bacterial assemblages associated with coral species of the Mexican Central Pacific
The functional role of coral-associated bacteria and their contribution to coral health is still largely unknown. The first necessary step to address this gap in the knowledge is based on characterization of the microbial assemblage of the coral and the species-specific, temporal and spatial variati...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Valparaíso. Facultad de Ciencias del Mar
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-19572017000200002 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The functional role of coral-associated bacteria and their contribution to coral health is still largely unknown. The first necessary step to address this gap in the knowledge is based on characterization of the microbial assemblage of the coral and the species-specific, temporal and spatial variation in its diversity. Branched corals (e.g., genus Pocillopora), are the main builders of coral reefs worldwide. This study evaluated the bacteria associated with the mucus and tissues of Pocillopora damicornis and Pocillopora verrucosa, as well as that of the seawater and surrounding sediments, in 6 sites of the Mexican Central Pacific during summer and winter seasons. The molecular techniques DGGE and RFLP were used with the 16S rDNA to assess the most abundant bacterial OTUs. The relationships between the bacterial-coral assemblage and environmental and spatial variables of the reef surroundings were also evaluated, using the multivariate analyses. Twenty different Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU) were obtained, with the highest number presented by the sediments. Specificity of bacterial groups was found for each coral species, as well as between the tissue and mucus of each species. The results showed that the bacterial dominant groups were similar between seasons, but these showed significant spatial variations among substrates within sites, as well as per substrate across all sites. The environmental variables that explained the variation of the dominant bacterial groups in corals and sea water were the coverages of fleshy macroalgae, live coral and sponge. In contrast, variation in the sediments was explained by the coverages of sand, rubble and rock. |
|---|