Self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviors

Introduction: The number of publications related to prosocial organizational behaviors (POB) increased in the past years. However, only a small number of studies focus on the intrapersonal process associated with these individual differences. Goals: The present article investigated the mediation rol...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tonetto da Rosa,Aline, de Lara Machado,Wagner, Ziebell de Oliveira,Manoela
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fundación Científica y Tecnológica. Asociación Chilena de Seguridad 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-24492016000100003
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-24492016000100003
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-244920160001000032016-06-06Self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviorsTonetto da Rosa,Alinede Lara Machado,WagnerZiebell de Oliveira,Manoela interpersonal relations working environment psychological feedback self-regulatory processes pro-social organizational behaviors Introduction: The number of publications related to prosocial organizational behaviors (POB) increased in the past years. However, only a small number of studies focus on the intrapersonal process associated with these individual differences. Goals: The present article investigated the mediation role that three self-regulatory processes (SRP) play on the relationship between POB and perceived partner responsiveness (PPR). Method: Participants were 206 Brazilian professionals (56 % women), with mean age of 34.4 years (SD = 9.16 years), hired in different organizations, who answered an online survey. Most participants worked in the services (31.1%) and industry (27.7%) fields. Data provided was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling. Results: SRP help to understand the interpersonal relationships at the work place in their complexity. They also stress the need to help professionals to be aware of the existence of SRP and the ways in which they influence their behaviors. Discussion: SRP might interfere significantly, for example, on how the PPR contributes to promote POB. Conclusions: Our findings encourage researchers to pay closer attention to the relationship between the constructs of PPR and POB in the future, and to explore other possible mediating or moderating variables within the larger social network of organizations.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundación Científica y Tecnológica. Asociación Chilena de SeguridadCiencia & trabajo v.18 n.55 20162016-01-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-24492016000100003en10.4067/S0718-24492016000100003
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic interpersonal relations
working environment
psychological feedback
self-regulatory processes
pro-social organizational behaviors
spellingShingle interpersonal relations
working environment
psychological feedback
self-regulatory processes
pro-social organizational behaviors
Tonetto da Rosa,Aline
de Lara Machado,Wagner
Ziebell de Oliveira,Manoela
Self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviors
description Introduction: The number of publications related to prosocial organizational behaviors (POB) increased in the past years. However, only a small number of studies focus on the intrapersonal process associated with these individual differences. Goals: The present article investigated the mediation role that three self-regulatory processes (SRP) play on the relationship between POB and perceived partner responsiveness (PPR). Method: Participants were 206 Brazilian professionals (56 % women), with mean age of 34.4 years (SD = 9.16 years), hired in different organizations, who answered an online survey. Most participants worked in the services (31.1%) and industry (27.7%) fields. Data provided was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling. Results: SRP help to understand the interpersonal relationships at the work place in their complexity. They also stress the need to help professionals to be aware of the existence of SRP and the ways in which they influence their behaviors. Discussion: SRP might interfere significantly, for example, on how the PPR contributes to promote POB. Conclusions: Our findings encourage researchers to pay closer attention to the relationship between the constructs of PPR and POB in the future, and to explore other possible mediating or moderating variables within the larger social network of organizations.
author Tonetto da Rosa,Aline
de Lara Machado,Wagner
Ziebell de Oliveira,Manoela
author_facet Tonetto da Rosa,Aline
de Lara Machado,Wagner
Ziebell de Oliveira,Manoela
author_sort Tonetto da Rosa,Aline
title Self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviors
title_short Self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviors
title_full Self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviors
title_fullStr Self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviors
title_full_unstemmed Self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviors
title_sort self-regulatory processes as mediators of the relationship between perceived partner responsiveness and prosocial organizational behaviors
publisher Fundación Científica y Tecnológica. Asociación Chilena de Seguridad
publishDate 2016
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-24492016000100003
work_keys_str_mv AT tonettodarosaaline selfregulatoryprocessesasmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenperceivedpartnerresponsivenessandprosocialorganizationalbehaviors
AT delaramachadowagner selfregulatoryprocessesasmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenperceivedpartnerresponsivenessandprosocialorganizationalbehaviors
AT ziebelldeoliveiramanoela selfregulatoryprocessesasmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenperceivedpartnerresponsivenessandprosocialorganizationalbehaviors
_version_ 1714203171098722304