Response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling
To compare the wheat genotypes in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling under osmotic stress conditions, a laboratory experiment was conducted using a completely random design with factorial arrangement. The wheat genotype (G) consisted of eight genotypes numbered as (G1) 9103, (G2) 9116,...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universidad de Tarapacá. Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-34292014000200008 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0718-34292014000200008 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0718-342920140002000082014-06-25Response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedlingEzzat-Ahmadi,MasoudMadani,AhadAlimohammadi,Abdolreza wheat germiantion seedling growth osmotic stress To compare the wheat genotypes in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling under osmotic stress conditions, a laboratory experiment was conducted using a completely random design with factorial arrangement. The wheat genotype (G) consisted of eight genotypes numbered as (G1) 9103, (G2) 9116, (G3) 9203, (G4) 9205, (G5) 9207, (G6) 9212, (G7) C-81-10 and (G8) cross-shahi. The osmotic potential factor (Ψs) consisted of five levels (-1.2,-0.9,-0.6,-0.3 and 0 MPa). Genotypes G2, G6 and G7 prevailed in terms of germination percentage (GP) up to Ψs = -1.2, while genotype G8 and genotype G6 were only prevalent at Ψs = 0 and up to Ψs = -0.9, respectively. The two genotypes of G1 and G4 had lower GPs at Ψs = 0 compared to other genotypes but these two genotypes had no significant difference with resistant genotype G7 in terms of GP at Ψs = -0.3. This trend continued in case of genotype G1 up to Ψs = -1.2, while genotype G4 had the lowest GP value next to G8 cultivar from Ψs = -0.6 to Ψs = -1.2. Interaction effect of Ψs x genotype was significant for Coleoptile Length (CL), Radicle Length (RL), Plumule Length (SL). G7 prevailed in terms of CL with a significant difference at Ψs = -1.2 while G1 lost its dominance. The same trend was observed in interaction effect of Ψs x genotype for SL. According to GP and CL and SL values, modern genotype G7 was the most resistant genotype to osmotic stress while old genotype G8 was the most sensitive one.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de Tarapacá. Facultad de Ciencias AgronómicasIdesia (Arica) v.32 n.2 20142014-05-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-34292014000200008en10.4067/S0718-34292014000200008 |
institution |
Scielo Chile |
collection |
Scielo Chile |
language |
English |
topic |
wheat germiantion seedling growth osmotic stress |
spellingShingle |
wheat germiantion seedling growth osmotic stress Ezzat-Ahmadi,Masoud Madani,Ahad Alimohammadi,Abdolreza Response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling |
description |
To compare the wheat genotypes in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling under osmotic stress conditions, a laboratory experiment was conducted using a completely random design with factorial arrangement. The wheat genotype (G) consisted of eight genotypes numbered as (G1) 9103, (G2) 9116, (G3) 9203, (G4) 9205, (G5) 9207, (G6) 9212, (G7) C-81-10 and (G8) cross-shahi. The osmotic potential factor (Ψs) consisted of five levels (-1.2,-0.9,-0.6,-0.3 and 0 MPa). Genotypes G2, G6 and G7 prevailed in terms of germination percentage (GP) up to Ψs = -1.2, while genotype G8 and genotype G6 were only prevalent at Ψs = 0 and up to Ψs = -0.9, respectively. The two genotypes of G1 and G4 had lower GPs at Ψs = 0 compared to other genotypes but these two genotypes had no significant difference with resistant genotype G7 in terms of GP at Ψs = -0.3. This trend continued in case of genotype G1 up to Ψs = -1.2, while genotype G4 had the lowest GP value next to G8 cultivar from Ψs = -0.6 to Ψs = -1.2. Interaction effect of Ψs x genotype was significant for Coleoptile Length (CL), Radicle Length (RL), Plumule Length (SL). G7 prevailed in terms of CL with a significant difference at Ψs = -1.2 while G1 lost its dominance. The same trend was observed in interaction effect of Ψs x genotype for SL. According to GP and CL and SL values, modern genotype G7 was the most resistant genotype to osmotic stress while old genotype G8 was the most sensitive one. |
author |
Ezzat-Ahmadi,Masoud Madani,Ahad Alimohammadi,Abdolreza |
author_facet |
Ezzat-Ahmadi,Masoud Madani,Ahad Alimohammadi,Abdolreza |
author_sort |
Ezzat-Ahmadi,Masoud |
title |
Response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling |
title_short |
Response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling |
title_full |
Response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling |
title_fullStr |
Response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling |
title_sort |
response of wheat genotypes to osmotic stress in terms of seed germination and growth of seedling |
publisher |
Universidad de Tarapacá. Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-34292014000200008 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ezzatahmadimasoud responseofwheatgenotypestoosmoticstressintermsofseedgerminationandgrowthofseedling AT madaniahad responseofwheatgenotypestoosmoticstressintermsofseedgerminationandgrowthofseedling AT alimohammadiabdolreza responseofwheatgenotypestoosmoticstressintermsofseedgerminationandgrowthofseedling |
_version_ |
1714203697604460544 |