Agreement Evaluation of a Newly Proposed System for Malocclusion Classification

The current malocclusion classification systems, routinely used in orthodontic practice, still yield different disagreement values among examiners who evaluate one and the same clinical case. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement effectiveness of a Newly Proposed System...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miguel-Neto,Antonio Borges, Nishio,Clarice, Mucha,José Nelson
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2010000100006
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-381X2010000100006
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-381X20100001000062012-01-19Agreement Evaluation of a Newly Proposed System for Malocclusion ClassificationMiguel-Neto,Antonio BorgesNishio,ClariceMucha,José Nelson Malocclusion classification systems Angle’s classification Katz’s classification The current malocclusion classification systems, routinely used in orthodontic practice, still yield different disagreement values among examiners who evaluate one and the same clinical case. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement effectiveness of a Newly Proposed System for malocclusion classification - in the anteroposterior orientation -, conceived by the present authors.Thirty-four examiners evaluated 15 malocclusion cases using Angle's, Katz’s and the Newly Proposed System classifications to determine which system shows the highest degree of agreement and accuracy when results were communicated among examiners. A comparison of the classifications attributed to each individual case and the mean figures found for the total data in each classification showed that the methods advanced by the Newly Proposed System yielded a higher degree of agreement (73.33%) than Angle’s (26.66%) and Katz’s (26.66%). The Newly Proposed System proved to be an outstanding malocclusion classification system with a high degree of agreement among examiners. On the other hand, however, further studies involving a wider sample of malocclusions and a greater number of examiners are strongly recommended if more conclusive results are to be achieved.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de La Frontera. Facultad de MedicinaInternational journal of odontostomatology v.4 n.1 20102010-04-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2010000100006en10.4067/S0718-381X2010000100006
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Malocclusion classification systems
Angle’s classification
Katz’s classification
spellingShingle Malocclusion classification systems
Angle’s classification
Katz’s classification
Miguel-Neto,Antonio Borges
Nishio,Clarice
Mucha,José Nelson
Agreement Evaluation of a Newly Proposed System for Malocclusion Classification
description The current malocclusion classification systems, routinely used in orthodontic practice, still yield different disagreement values among examiners who evaluate one and the same clinical case. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement effectiveness of a Newly Proposed System for malocclusion classification - in the anteroposterior orientation -, conceived by the present authors.Thirty-four examiners evaluated 15 malocclusion cases using Angle's, Katz’s and the Newly Proposed System classifications to determine which system shows the highest degree of agreement and accuracy when results were communicated among examiners. A comparison of the classifications attributed to each individual case and the mean figures found for the total data in each classification showed that the methods advanced by the Newly Proposed System yielded a higher degree of agreement (73.33%) than Angle’s (26.66%) and Katz’s (26.66%). The Newly Proposed System proved to be an outstanding malocclusion classification system with a high degree of agreement among examiners. On the other hand, however, further studies involving a wider sample of malocclusions and a greater number of examiners are strongly recommended if more conclusive results are to be achieved.
author Miguel-Neto,Antonio Borges
Nishio,Clarice
Mucha,José Nelson
author_facet Miguel-Neto,Antonio Borges
Nishio,Clarice
Mucha,José Nelson
author_sort Miguel-Neto,Antonio Borges
title Agreement Evaluation of a Newly Proposed System for Malocclusion Classification
title_short Agreement Evaluation of a Newly Proposed System for Malocclusion Classification
title_full Agreement Evaluation of a Newly Proposed System for Malocclusion Classification
title_fullStr Agreement Evaluation of a Newly Proposed System for Malocclusion Classification
title_full_unstemmed Agreement Evaluation of a Newly Proposed System for Malocclusion Classification
title_sort agreement evaluation of a newly proposed system for malocclusion classification
publisher Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina
publishDate 2010
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2010000100006
work_keys_str_mv AT miguelnetoantonioborges agreementevaluationofanewlyproposedsystemformalocclusionclassification
AT nishioclarice agreementevaluationofanewlyproposedsystemformalocclusionclassification
AT muchajosenelson agreementevaluationofanewlyproposedsystemformalocclusionclassification
_version_ 1714203914691149824