Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro Study

The use of indirect restorations have increased in tooth with great dental destruction due to their physical and mechanical properties that bestow higher durability than other type of restoration. The aim of the study was to compare the flexural resistance of four indirect restoration materials (com...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Muñoz Fernandez,Ignacio, Florio Mogollones,Rodrigo, Velásquez Castilla,Manuel
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina 2013
Materias:	mechanical phenomena permanent dental restoration composite resins ceramics dental materials
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2013000200023
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0718-381X2013000200023
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0718-381X20130002000232013-11-04Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro StudyMuñoz Fernandez,IgnacioFlorio Mogollones,RodrigoVelásquez Castilla,Manuel mechanical phenomena permanent dental restoration composite resins ceramics dental materials The use of indirect restorations have increased in tooth with great dental destruction due to their physical and mechanical properties that bestow higher durability than other type of restoration. The aim of the study was to compare the flexural resistance of four indirect restoration materials (composite Filtek P60; ceromers Adoro and Ceramage; ceramic IPS e.max), by testing the hypothesis that ceramic has a higher flexural resistance than ceromer and composite. Ten bars of each material were made following the 27, 53, 69 ANSI/ADA norms and the manufacturer's instructions. The flexural resistance was obtained by a three-point test using the Instron machine at a loading rate of 1 mm/min. The resistance was calculated in MPa and the results were statistically analyzed through ANOVA y Scheffé tests. Filtek P60 flexural resistance is significantly higher than Ceramage. Adoro flexural resistance is significantly lower than all the other materials. It is necessary to make absolutely clear that the research was executed in vitro, whereby its resistances may differ than in mouth because of the cementation and the "mono-block" formation. Through the research it was determined that Filtek P60 is significantly higher than Ceramage, and that Adoro is significantly less than all the other compared materials regarding flexural resistance; whereby the raised hypothesis is nullified.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de La Frontera. Facultad de MedicinaInternational journal of odontostomatology v.7 n.2 20132013-08-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2013000200023en10.4067/S0718-381X2013000200023
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
topic	mechanical phenomena permanent dental restoration composite resins ceramics dental materials
spellingShingle	mechanical phenomena permanent dental restoration composite resins ceramics dental materials Muñoz Fernandez,Ignacio Florio Mogollones,Rodrigo Velásquez Castilla,Manuel Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro Study
description	The use of indirect restorations have increased in tooth with great dental destruction due to their physical and mechanical properties that bestow higher durability than other type of restoration. The aim of the study was to compare the flexural resistance of four indirect restoration materials (composite Filtek P60; ceromers Adoro and Ceramage; ceramic IPS e.max), by testing the hypothesis that ceramic has a higher flexural resistance than ceromer and composite. Ten bars of each material were made following the 27, 53, 69 ANSI/ADA norms and the manufacturer's instructions. The flexural resistance was obtained by a three-point test using the Instron machine at a loading rate of 1 mm/min. The resistance was calculated in MPa and the results were statistically analyzed through ANOVA y Scheffé tests. Filtek P60 flexural resistance is significantly higher than Ceramage. Adoro flexural resistance is significantly lower than all the other materials. It is necessary to make absolutely clear that the research was executed in vitro, whereby its resistances may differ than in mouth because of the cementation and the "mono-block" formation. Through the research it was determined that Filtek P60 is significantly higher than Ceramage, and that Adoro is significantly less than all the other compared materials regarding flexural resistance; whereby the raised hypothesis is nullified.
author	Muñoz Fernandez,Ignacio Florio Mogollones,Rodrigo Velásquez Castilla,Manuel
author_facet	Muñoz Fernandez,Ignacio Florio Mogollones,Rodrigo Velásquez Castilla,Manuel
author_sort	Muñoz Fernandez,Ignacio
title	Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_short	Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_full	Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_fullStr	Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed	Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_sort	flexural resistance of esthetic materials used by indirect restoration: a comparative in vitro study
publisher	Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina
publishDate	2013
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2013000200023
work_keys_str_mv	AT munozfernandezignacio flexuralresistanceofestheticmaterialsusedbyindirectrestorationacomparativeinvitrostudy AT floriomogollonesrodrigo flexuralresistanceofestheticmaterialsusedbyindirectrestorationacomparativeinvitrostudy AT velasquezcastillamanuel flexuralresistanceofestheticmaterialsusedbyindirectrestorationacomparativeinvitrostudy
_version_	1714203946180935680

Flexural Resistance of Esthetic Materials Used by Indirect Restoration: A Comparative in vitro Study

Ejemplares similares