In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual Retainer

The aim of the present study was to evaluate which material and technique were the best for bonding 3x3 lingual retainer. One hundred and five bovine mandibular incisors were used, to which contention bars with a standardized size of 7 mm were bonded to the lingual surface. Initially all teeth recei...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Pithon,Matheus Melo, Ferraz,Caio de Souza, de Oliveira,Gabriel Couto, Magalhaes,Pedro Henrique Bomfim
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina 2013
Materias:	shear strength composite resins orthodontic appliances
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2013000300011
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0718-381X2013000300011
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0718-381X20130003000112014-01-02In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual RetainerPithon,Matheus MeloFerraz,Caio de Souzade Oliveira,Gabriel CoutoMagalhaes,Pedro Henrique Bomfim shear strength composite resins orthodontic appliances The aim of the present study was to evaluate which material and technique were the best for bonding 3x3 lingual retainer. One hundred and five bovine mandibular incisors were used, to which contention bars with a standardized size of 7 mm were bonded to the lingual surface. Initially all teeth received prophylaxis with pumice stone and water. After this they were randomly divided into seven groups, denominated and characterized as follows: Group (1) bars bonded with Transbond XT in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions; (2) Tooth surface etching with self-etching agent Transbond (SEPT) followed by bonding with Transbond XT; (3) Bonding with Transbond Plus Color Change (TPCC) without adhesive; (4) Bonding with TPCC + SEPT; (5) Bonding with restorative composite Z100 + adhesive Prime Bond, (6) Z100 without adhesive and (7) Z100 + SEPT. Before bonding in Groups 1, 3, 5 and 6 the lingual surface was etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds, followed by washing and drying. After bonding the mechanical tests were performed in a Universal mechanical test machine. The values obtained were submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and afterwards to the Tukey test (p<0.05). We observed absence of statistical differences among Groups 1, 2, 5 and 7 and among Groups 3, 4, 5 and 6 (p<0.05). Group 1 presented the highest bond strength value and Group 6 the lowest. It could be concluded that where bonding of lingual retainer is concerned; the best material to use is Transbond XT irrespective of the etching method, followed by composite Z100 etched with SEPT.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de La Frontera. Facultad de MedicinaInternational journal of odontostomatology v.7 n.3 20132013-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2013000300011en10.4067/S0718-381X2013000300011
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
topic	shear strength composite resins orthodontic appliances
spellingShingle	shear strength composite resins orthodontic appliances Pithon,Matheus Melo Ferraz,Caio de Souza de Oliveira,Gabriel Couto Magalhaes,Pedro Henrique Bomfim In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual Retainer
description	The aim of the present study was to evaluate which material and technique were the best for bonding 3x3 lingual retainer. One hundred and five bovine mandibular incisors were used, to which contention bars with a standardized size of 7 mm were bonded to the lingual surface. Initially all teeth received prophylaxis with pumice stone and water. After this they were randomly divided into seven groups, denominated and characterized as follows: Group (1) bars bonded with Transbond XT in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions; (2) Tooth surface etching with self-etching agent Transbond (SEPT) followed by bonding with Transbond XT; (3) Bonding with Transbond Plus Color Change (TPCC) without adhesive; (4) Bonding with TPCC + SEPT; (5) Bonding with restorative composite Z100 + adhesive Prime Bond, (6) Z100 without adhesive and (7) Z100 + SEPT. Before bonding in Groups 1, 3, 5 and 6 the lingual surface was etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds, followed by washing and drying. After bonding the mechanical tests were performed in a Universal mechanical test machine. The values obtained were submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and afterwards to the Tukey test (p<0.05). We observed absence of statistical differences among Groups 1, 2, 5 and 7 and among Groups 3, 4, 5 and 6 (p<0.05). Group 1 presented the highest bond strength value and Group 6 the lowest. It could be concluded that where bonding of lingual retainer is concerned; the best material to use is Transbond XT irrespective of the etching method, followed by composite Z100 etched with SEPT.
author	Pithon,Matheus Melo Ferraz,Caio de Souza de Oliveira,Gabriel Couto Magalhaes,Pedro Henrique Bomfim
author_facet	Pithon,Matheus Melo Ferraz,Caio de Souza de Oliveira,Gabriel Couto Magalhaes,Pedro Henrique Bomfim
author_sort	Pithon,Matheus Melo
title	In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual Retainer
title_short	In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual Retainer
title_full	In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual Retainer
title_fullStr	In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual Retainer
title_full_unstemmed	In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual Retainer
title_sort	in vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of materials used in bonding 3x3 lingual retainer
publisher	Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina
publishDate	2013
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2013000300011
work_keys_str_mv	AT pithonmatheusmelo invitroevaluationofshearbondstrengthofmaterialsusedinbonding3x3lingualretainer AT ferrazcaiodesouza invitroevaluationofshearbondstrengthofmaterialsusedinbonding3x3lingualretainer AT deoliveiragabrielcouto invitroevaluationofshearbondstrengthofmaterialsusedinbonding3x3lingualretainer AT magalhaespedrohenriquebomfim invitroevaluationofshearbondstrengthofmaterialsusedinbonding3x3lingualretainer
_version_	1714203948318982144

In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Materials Used in Bonding 3x3 Lingual Retainer

Ejemplares similares