Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps

This study evaluated the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with wide Mesial-Occlusal-Distal (MOD) cavity preparations and unsupported cusps restored by four ways, compared with intact teeth. Thirty five human teeth were divided into five groups: control (G1 - intact teeth) and four experime...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães, Orsi,Iara Augusta, Borie-Echevarría,Evelyn, Borie,Eduardo
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2014000100018
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-381X2014000100018
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-381X20140001000182015-11-13Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported CuspsFerreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli GuimarãesOrsi,Iara AugustaBorie-Echevarría,EvelynBorie,Eduardo fracture resistance composite dental amalgam This study evaluated the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with wide Mesial-Occlusal-Distal (MOD) cavity preparations and unsupported cusps restored by four ways, compared with intact teeth. Thirty five human teeth were divided into five groups: control (G1 - intact teeth) and four experimental groups of MOD-prepared teeth: with buccal (B) and lingual (L) cusps reinforced with composite (Z-250) and restored with silver amalgam (Permite C) (G2); teeth with B and L cusps reinforced and linked with composite (P-60) and restored with silver amalgam (Permite C) (G3); teeth restored with composite (Z-250) by incremental fill technique (G4); and teeth with B and L cusps reinforced and linked with composite (P-60) and restored with composite (Z-250) by incremental fill technique (G5). After thermal cycling (500 cycles, 5°C to 55°C), fracture resistance was tested in a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis of the results (ANOVA) revealed no significant difference (p>0.5) among the groups (G1=157.78Kgf, G2=183.99Kgf, G3=152.53Kgf, G4=182.61Kgf and G5=155.96Kgf). Visual analysis of the teeth tested showed predominance of oblique failure pattern. The four types of restoration evaluated provide fracture resistance with values equivalent to intact teeth in MOD-prepared intact teeth with parallel walls and composite-reinforced cusps.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de La Frontera. Facultad de MedicinaInternational journal of odontostomatology v.8 n.1 20142014-04-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2014000100018en10.4067/S0718-381X2014000100018
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic fracture resistance
composite
dental amalgam
spellingShingle fracture resistance
composite
dental amalgam
Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães
Orsi,Iara Augusta
Borie-Echevarría,Evelyn
Borie,Eduardo
Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps
description This study evaluated the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with wide Mesial-Occlusal-Distal (MOD) cavity preparations and unsupported cusps restored by four ways, compared with intact teeth. Thirty five human teeth were divided into five groups: control (G1 - intact teeth) and four experimental groups of MOD-prepared teeth: with buccal (B) and lingual (L) cusps reinforced with composite (Z-250) and restored with silver amalgam (Permite C) (G2); teeth with B and L cusps reinforced and linked with composite (P-60) and restored with silver amalgam (Permite C) (G3); teeth restored with composite (Z-250) by incremental fill technique (G4); and teeth with B and L cusps reinforced and linked with composite (P-60) and restored with composite (Z-250) by incremental fill technique (G5). After thermal cycling (500 cycles, 5°C to 55°C), fracture resistance was tested in a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis of the results (ANOVA) revealed no significant difference (p>0.5) among the groups (G1=157.78Kgf, G2=183.99Kgf, G3=152.53Kgf, G4=182.61Kgf and G5=155.96Kgf). Visual analysis of the teeth tested showed predominance of oblique failure pattern. The four types of restoration evaluated provide fracture resistance with values equivalent to intact teeth in MOD-prepared intact teeth with parallel walls and composite-reinforced cusps.
author Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães
Orsi,Iara Augusta
Borie-Echevarría,Evelyn
Borie,Eduardo
author_facet Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães
Orsi,Iara Augusta
Borie-Echevarría,Evelyn
Borie,Eduardo
author_sort Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães
title Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps
title_short Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps
title_full Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps
title_fullStr Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps
title_sort evaluation of composite reinforcement on the fracture resistance of teeth with unsupported cusps
publisher Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2014000100018
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreiramarlychristiennecapaneliguimaraes evaluationofcompositereinforcementonthefractureresistanceofteethwithunsupportedcusps
AT orsiiaraaugusta evaluationofcompositereinforcementonthefractureresistanceofteethwithunsupportedcusps
AT borieechevarriaevelyn evaluationofcompositereinforcementonthefractureresistanceofteethwithunsupportedcusps
AT borieeduardo evaluationofcompositereinforcementonthefractureresistanceofteethwithunsupportedcusps
_version_ 1714203953126703104