Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps
This study evaluated the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with wide Mesial-Occlusal-Distal (MOD) cavity preparations and unsupported cusps restored by four ways, compared with intact teeth. Thirty five human teeth were divided into five groups: control (G1 - intact teeth) and four experime...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2014000100018 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0718-381X2014000100018 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0718-381X20140001000182015-11-13Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported CuspsFerreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli GuimarãesOrsi,Iara AugustaBorie-Echevarría,EvelynBorie,Eduardo fracture resistance composite dental amalgam This study evaluated the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with wide Mesial-Occlusal-Distal (MOD) cavity preparations and unsupported cusps restored by four ways, compared with intact teeth. Thirty five human teeth were divided into five groups: control (G1 - intact teeth) and four experimental groups of MOD-prepared teeth: with buccal (B) and lingual (L) cusps reinforced with composite (Z-250) and restored with silver amalgam (Permite C) (G2); teeth with B and L cusps reinforced and linked with composite (P-60) and restored with silver amalgam (Permite C) (G3); teeth restored with composite (Z-250) by incremental fill technique (G4); and teeth with B and L cusps reinforced and linked with composite (P-60) and restored with composite (Z-250) by incremental fill technique (G5). After thermal cycling (500 cycles, 5°C to 55°C), fracture resistance was tested in a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis of the results (ANOVA) revealed no significant difference (p>0.5) among the groups (G1=157.78Kgf, G2=183.99Kgf, G3=152.53Kgf, G4=182.61Kgf and G5=155.96Kgf). Visual analysis of the teeth tested showed predominance of oblique failure pattern. The four types of restoration evaluated provide fracture resistance with values equivalent to intact teeth in MOD-prepared intact teeth with parallel walls and composite-reinforced cusps.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de La Frontera. Facultad de MedicinaInternational journal of odontostomatology v.8 n.1 20142014-04-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2014000100018en10.4067/S0718-381X2014000100018 |
institution |
Scielo Chile |
collection |
Scielo Chile |
language |
English |
topic |
fracture resistance composite dental amalgam |
spellingShingle |
fracture resistance composite dental amalgam Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães Orsi,Iara Augusta Borie-Echevarría,Evelyn Borie,Eduardo Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps |
description |
This study evaluated the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with wide Mesial-Occlusal-Distal (MOD) cavity preparations and unsupported cusps restored by four ways, compared with intact teeth. Thirty five human teeth were divided into five groups: control (G1 - intact teeth) and four experimental groups of MOD-prepared teeth: with buccal (B) and lingual (L) cusps reinforced with composite (Z-250) and restored with silver amalgam (Permite C) (G2); teeth with B and L cusps reinforced and linked with composite (P-60) and restored with silver amalgam (Permite C) (G3); teeth restored with composite (Z-250) by incremental fill technique (G4); and teeth with B and L cusps reinforced and linked with composite (P-60) and restored with composite (Z-250) by incremental fill technique (G5). After thermal cycling (500 cycles, 5°C to 55°C), fracture resistance was tested in a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis of the results (ANOVA) revealed no significant difference (p>0.5) among the groups (G1=157.78Kgf, G2=183.99Kgf, G3=152.53Kgf, G4=182.61Kgf and G5=155.96Kgf). Visual analysis of the teeth tested showed predominance of oblique failure pattern. The four types of restoration evaluated provide fracture resistance with values equivalent to intact teeth in MOD-prepared intact teeth with parallel walls and composite-reinforced cusps. |
author |
Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães Orsi,Iara Augusta Borie-Echevarría,Evelyn Borie,Eduardo |
author_facet |
Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães Orsi,Iara Augusta Borie-Echevarría,Evelyn Borie,Eduardo |
author_sort |
Ferreira,Marly Christiènne Capaneli Guimarães |
title |
Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps |
title_short |
Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps |
title_full |
Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Composite Reinforcement on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth with Unsupported Cusps |
title_sort |
evaluation of composite reinforcement on the fracture resistance of teeth with unsupported cusps |
publisher |
Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2014000100018 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ferreiramarlychristiennecapaneliguimaraes evaluationofcompositereinforcementonthefractureresistanceofteethwithunsupportedcusps AT orsiiaraaugusta evaluationofcompositereinforcementonthefractureresistanceofteethwithunsupportedcusps AT borieechevarriaevelyn evaluationofcompositereinforcementonthefractureresistanceofteethwithunsupportedcusps AT borieeduardo evaluationofcompositereinforcementonthefractureresistanceofteethwithunsupportedcusps |
_version_ |
1714203953126703104 |