Assessment of Marginal Adaptation Before and After Thermo-Mechanical Loading and Volumetric Shrinkage: Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite

ABSTRACT: The objective of the study was to evaluate marginal adaptation of Class II mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations before and after thermo-mechanical loading and volumetric shrinkage of the bulk-fill vs conventional composite resin. For marginal adaptation assessment, 24 Class II MOD cav...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jassé,Fernanda Ferreira de Albuquerque, Alencar,Cristiane de Melo, Zaniboni,Joissi Ferrari, Silva,Aryvelto Miranda, Campos,Edson Alves de
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000100060
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-381X2020000100060
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-381X20200001000602019-12-17Assessment of Marginal Adaptation Before and After Thermo-Mechanical Loading and Volumetric Shrinkage: Bulk Fill versus Conventional CompositeJassé,Fernanda Ferreira de AlbuquerqueAlencar,Cristiane de MeloZaniboni,Joissi FerrariSilva,Aryvelto MirandaCampos,Edson Alves de composite resins dental marginal adaptation dental cavity preparation polymerization ABSTRACT: The objective of the study was to evaluate marginal adaptation of Class II mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations before and after thermo-mechanical loading and volumetric shrinkage of the bulk-fill vs conventional composite resin. For marginal adaptation assessment, 24 Class II MOD cavities with cervical margins extending 1.0 mm below (distal) and 1.0 mm beyond (mesial) the cement-enamel junction were prepared in extracted human molars. The teeth were filled as follows: Group A - bulk-fill with SureFil SDR flow (first increment, 4 mm; second increment, 2 mm); Group B - bulk-fill with SureFil SDR flow as a base (first increment, 4 mm) and covered with the conventional nanohybrid composite Esthet-X HD (second increment, 2 mm); and Group C - incrementally filled with Esthet-X HD. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy before and after thermomechanical loading (240,000 loading cycles and simultaneous 600 thermal cycles). To evaluate volumetric polymerization shrinkage, a semi-spherical mold was filled with the tested composites and placed in an AccuVol device after light curing. Both before and after loading, marginal adaptation in cervical dentin was superior (p < 0.05) for Groups A and B compared with Group C. In cervical enamel, Group B showed better marginal adaptation than Group C, and Group A presented intermediary results, between Groups B and C. Furthermore, bulk-fill flow resulted in greater shrinkage than Esthet-X HD. A significant improvement of marginal adaptation was observed when bulkfill flow was used instead of conventional composite resin both before and after thermomechanical loading. However, the bulk-fill flow presented higher volumetric polymerization shrinkage than the conventional composite.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de La Frontera. Facultad de MedicinaInternational journal of odontostomatology v.14 n.1 20202020-03-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000100060en10.4067/S0718-381X2020000100060
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic composite resins
dental marginal adaptation
dental cavity preparation
polymerization
spellingShingle composite resins
dental marginal adaptation
dental cavity preparation
polymerization
Jassé,Fernanda Ferreira de Albuquerque
Alencar,Cristiane de Melo
Zaniboni,Joissi Ferrari
Silva,Aryvelto Miranda
Campos,Edson Alves de
Assessment of Marginal Adaptation Before and After Thermo-Mechanical Loading and Volumetric Shrinkage: Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite
description ABSTRACT: The objective of the study was to evaluate marginal adaptation of Class II mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations before and after thermo-mechanical loading and volumetric shrinkage of the bulk-fill vs conventional composite resin. For marginal adaptation assessment, 24 Class II MOD cavities with cervical margins extending 1.0 mm below (distal) and 1.0 mm beyond (mesial) the cement-enamel junction were prepared in extracted human molars. The teeth were filled as follows: Group A - bulk-fill with SureFil SDR flow (first increment, 4 mm; second increment, 2 mm); Group B - bulk-fill with SureFil SDR flow as a base (first increment, 4 mm) and covered with the conventional nanohybrid composite Esthet-X HD (second increment, 2 mm); and Group C - incrementally filled with Esthet-X HD. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy before and after thermomechanical loading (240,000 loading cycles and simultaneous 600 thermal cycles). To evaluate volumetric polymerization shrinkage, a semi-spherical mold was filled with the tested composites and placed in an AccuVol device after light curing. Both before and after loading, marginal adaptation in cervical dentin was superior (p < 0.05) for Groups A and B compared with Group C. In cervical enamel, Group B showed better marginal adaptation than Group C, and Group A presented intermediary results, between Groups B and C. Furthermore, bulk-fill flow resulted in greater shrinkage than Esthet-X HD. A significant improvement of marginal adaptation was observed when bulkfill flow was used instead of conventional composite resin both before and after thermomechanical loading. However, the bulk-fill flow presented higher volumetric polymerization shrinkage than the conventional composite.
author Jassé,Fernanda Ferreira de Albuquerque
Alencar,Cristiane de Melo
Zaniboni,Joissi Ferrari
Silva,Aryvelto Miranda
Campos,Edson Alves de
author_facet Jassé,Fernanda Ferreira de Albuquerque
Alencar,Cristiane de Melo
Zaniboni,Joissi Ferrari
Silva,Aryvelto Miranda
Campos,Edson Alves de
author_sort Jassé,Fernanda Ferreira de Albuquerque
title Assessment of Marginal Adaptation Before and After Thermo-Mechanical Loading and Volumetric Shrinkage: Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite
title_short Assessment of Marginal Adaptation Before and After Thermo-Mechanical Loading and Volumetric Shrinkage: Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite
title_full Assessment of Marginal Adaptation Before and After Thermo-Mechanical Loading and Volumetric Shrinkage: Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite
title_fullStr Assessment of Marginal Adaptation Before and After Thermo-Mechanical Loading and Volumetric Shrinkage: Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Marginal Adaptation Before and After Thermo-Mechanical Loading and Volumetric Shrinkage: Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite
title_sort assessment of marginal adaptation before and after thermo-mechanical loading and volumetric shrinkage: bulk fill versus conventional composite
publisher Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina
publishDate 2020
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000100060
work_keys_str_mv AT jassefernandaferreiradealbuquerque assessmentofmarginaladaptationbeforeandafterthermomechanicalloadingandvolumetricshrinkagebulkfillversusconventionalcomposite
AT alencarcristianedemelo assessmentofmarginaladaptationbeforeandafterthermomechanicalloadingandvolumetricshrinkagebulkfillversusconventionalcomposite
AT zanibonijoissiferrari assessmentofmarginaladaptationbeforeandafterthermomechanicalloadingandvolumetricshrinkagebulkfillversusconventionalcomposite
AT silvaaryveltomiranda assessmentofmarginaladaptationbeforeandafterthermomechanicalloadingandvolumetricshrinkagebulkfillversusconventionalcomposite
AT camposedsonalvesde assessmentofmarginaladaptationbeforeandafterthermomechanicalloadingandvolumetricshrinkagebulkfillversusconventionalcomposite
_version_ 1714204025508855808