Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study

ABSTRACT: There is no information about the possible impact in denture retention after the use of common denture adhesives (DAs) when poor denture foundations (PDF) are present. Moreover, there is a lack of information about which current formulation provides greater retention and for how long. Twel...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Flores-León,José Zacarías Jaime, Domínguez-Pérez,Rubén Abraham, Ruíz-Valdez,Héctor Ernesto, Sámano-Valencia,Carolina, Loyola-Rodríguez,Juan Pablo, Castro-Ruiz,Eduardo
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina 2020
Materias:	denture adhesives retention poor denture foundation good denture foundation
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000200236
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0718-381X2020000200236
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0718-381X20200002002362020-02-27Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro StudyFlores-León,José Zacarías JaimeDomínguez-Pérez,Rubén AbrahamRuíz-Valdez,Héctor ErnestoSámano-Valencia,CarolinaLoyola-Rodríguez,Juan PabloCastro-Ruiz,Eduardo denture adhesives retention poor denture foundation good denture foundation ABSTRACT: There is no information about the possible impact in denture retention after the use of common denture adhesives (DAs) when poor denture foundations (PDF) are present. Moreover, there is a lack of information about which current formulation provides greater retention and for how long. Twelve models from edentulous patients with different ridge shape and border height were used and complete dentures were manufactured. Four different formulation brands of DAs were tested after 10 minutes and three, six, nine, and 12 hours of DA application using a universal testing machine. The Fittydent® and Fixodent® adhesives had the highest retention at 12 hours. The PDF group increased on average its retention by 400 %. However, the group presented lower retention compared to the good denture foundation group. In conclusion, DAs significantly increased denture retention. The PDF group were the most benefited with the application of DAs. The Fixodent® paste had the highest retention.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad de La Frontera. Facultad de MedicinaInternational journal of odontostomatology v.14 n.2 20202020-06-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000200236en10.4067/S0718-381X2020000200236
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
topic	denture adhesives retention poor denture foundation good denture foundation
spellingShingle	denture adhesives retention poor denture foundation good denture foundation Flores-León,José Zacarías Jaime Domínguez-Pérez,Rubén Abraham Ruíz-Valdez,Héctor Ernesto Sámano-Valencia,Carolina Loyola-Rodríguez,Juan Pablo Castro-Ruiz,Eduardo Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study
description	ABSTRACT: There is no information about the possible impact in denture retention after the use of common denture adhesives (DAs) when poor denture foundations (PDF) are present. Moreover, there is a lack of information about which current formulation provides greater retention and for how long. Twelve models from edentulous patients with different ridge shape and border height were used and complete dentures were manufactured. Four different formulation brands of DAs were tested after 10 minutes and three, six, nine, and 12 hours of DA application using a universal testing machine. The Fittydent® and Fixodent® adhesives had the highest retention at 12 hours. The PDF group increased on average its retention by 400 %. However, the group presented lower retention compared to the good denture foundation group. In conclusion, DAs significantly increased denture retention. The PDF group were the most benefited with the application of DAs. The Fixodent® paste had the highest retention.
author	Flores-León,José Zacarías Jaime Domínguez-Pérez,Rubén Abraham Ruíz-Valdez,Héctor Ernesto Sámano-Valencia,Carolina Loyola-Rodríguez,Juan Pablo Castro-Ruiz,Eduardo
author_facet	Flores-León,José Zacarías Jaime Domínguez-Pérez,Rubén Abraham Ruíz-Valdez,Héctor Ernesto Sámano-Valencia,Carolina Loyola-Rodríguez,Juan Pablo Castro-Ruiz,Eduardo
author_sort	Flores-León,José Zacarías Jaime
title	Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study
title_short	Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study
title_full	Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study
title_fullStr	Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study
title_sort	comparison of the retention of conventional dentures after the use of common adhesive brands on poor denture foundations. an in vitro study
publisher	Universidad de La Frontera. Facultad de Medicina
publishDate	2020
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000200236
work_keys_str_mv	AT floresleonjosezacariasjaime comparisonoftheretentionofconventionaldenturesaftertheuseofcommonadhesivebrandsonpoordenturefoundationsaninvitrostudy AT dominguezperezrubenabraham comparisonoftheretentionofconventionaldenturesaftertheuseofcommonadhesivebrandsonpoordenturefoundationsaninvitrostudy AT ruizvaldezhectorernesto comparisonoftheretentionofconventionaldenturesaftertheuseofcommonadhesivebrandsonpoordenturefoundationsaninvitrostudy AT samanovalenciacarolina comparisonoftheretentionofconventionaldenturesaftertheuseofcommonadhesivebrandsonpoordenturefoundationsaninvitrostudy AT loyolarodriguezjuanpablo comparisonoftheretentionofconventionaldenturesaftertheuseofcommonadhesivebrandsonpoordenturefoundationsaninvitrostudy AT castroruizeduardo comparisonoftheretentionofconventionaldenturesaftertheuseofcommonadhesivebrandsonpoordenturefoundationsaninvitrostudy
_version_	1714204029888757760

Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study

Ejemplares similares