Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)

In situ records of sea surface temperature collected between 2005 and 2009 were used to compare, for the first time, the temperature estimated by the Multichannel algorithms (MCSST) of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors in San Matías Gulf, in the north of the Argentinean Pa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams,Gabriela N, Zaidman,Paula C, Glembocki,Nora G, Narvarte,Maite A, González,Raúl A.C, Esteves,José L, Gagliardini,Domingo A
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Facultad de Recursos Naturales. Escuela de Ciencias del Mar 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-560X2014000100016
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-560X2014000100016
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-560X20140001000162014-04-23Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)Williams,Gabriela NZaidman,Paula CGlembocki,Nora GNarvarte,Maite AGonzález,Raúl A.CEsteves,José LGagliardini,Domingo A sea surface temperature in situ records MCSST-AVHRR San Matías Gulf southwestern Atlantic In situ records of sea surface temperature collected between 2005 and 2009 were used to compare, for the first time, the temperature estimated by the Multichannel algorithms (MCSST) of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors in San Matías Gulf, in the north of the Argentinean Patagonian Continental Shelf (between 40°47'-42°13'S). Match-ups between in situ records and satellite sea surface temperature (SST) were analyzed. In situ records came from fixed stations and oceanographic cruises, while satellite data came from different NOAA satellites. The fitting of temperature data to a Standard Major Axis (SMA) type II regression model indicated that a high proportion of the total variance (0.53< r² <0.99) was explained by this model showing a high correlation between in situ data and satellite estimations. The mean differences between satellite and in situ data for the full data set were 1.64 ± 1.49°C. Looking separately into in situ data from different sources and day and night estimates from different NOAA satellites, the differences were between 0.30 ± 0.60°C and 2.60 ± 1.50°C. In this paper we discuss possible reasons for the above-mentioned performance of the MCSST algorithms in the study area.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Facultad de Recursos Naturales. Escuela de Ciencias del MarLatin american journal of aquatic research v.42 n.1 20142014-03-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-560X2014000100016en103856/vol42-issue1-fulltext-16
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic sea surface temperature
in situ records
MCSST-AVHRR
San Matías Gulf
southwestern Atlantic
spellingShingle sea surface temperature
in situ records
MCSST-AVHRR
San Matías Gulf
southwestern Atlantic
Williams,Gabriela N
Zaidman,Paula C
Glembocki,Nora G
Narvarte,Maite A
González,Raúl A.C
Esteves,José L
Gagliardini,Domingo A
Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
description In situ records of sea surface temperature collected between 2005 and 2009 were used to compare, for the first time, the temperature estimated by the Multichannel algorithms (MCSST) of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors in San Matías Gulf, in the north of the Argentinean Patagonian Continental Shelf (between 40°47'-42°13'S). Match-ups between in situ records and satellite sea surface temperature (SST) were analyzed. In situ records came from fixed stations and oceanographic cruises, while satellite data came from different NOAA satellites. The fitting of temperature data to a Standard Major Axis (SMA) type II regression model indicated that a high proportion of the total variance (0.53< r² <0.99) was explained by this model showing a high correlation between in situ data and satellite estimations. The mean differences between satellite and in situ data for the full data set were 1.64 ± 1.49°C. Looking separately into in situ data from different sources and day and night estimates from different NOAA satellites, the differences were between 0.30 ± 0.60°C and 2.60 ± 1.50°C. In this paper we discuss possible reasons for the above-mentioned performance of the MCSST algorithms in the study area.
author Williams,Gabriela N
Zaidman,Paula C
Glembocki,Nora G
Narvarte,Maite A
González,Raúl A.C
Esteves,José L
Gagliardini,Domingo A
author_facet Williams,Gabriela N
Zaidman,Paula C
Glembocki,Nora G
Narvarte,Maite A
González,Raúl A.C
Esteves,José L
Gagliardini,Domingo A
author_sort Williams,Gabriela N
title Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_short Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_full Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_fullStr Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_sort comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (avhrr) and in situ records in san matías gulf (patagonia, argentina)
publisher Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Facultad de Recursos Naturales. Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-560X2014000100016
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsgabrielan comparisonbetweenremotelysensedseasurfacetemperatureavhrrandinsiturecordsinsanmatiasgulfpatagoniaargentina
AT zaidmanpaulac comparisonbetweenremotelysensedseasurfacetemperatureavhrrandinsiturecordsinsanmatiasgulfpatagoniaargentina
AT glembockinorag comparisonbetweenremotelysensedseasurfacetemperatureavhrrandinsiturecordsinsanmatiasgulfpatagoniaargentina
AT narvartemaitea comparisonbetweenremotelysensedseasurfacetemperatureavhrrandinsiturecordsinsanmatiasgulfpatagoniaargentina
AT gonzalezraulac comparisonbetweenremotelysensedseasurfacetemperatureavhrrandinsiturecordsinsanmatiasgulfpatagoniaargentina
AT estevesjosel comparisonbetweenremotelysensedseasurfacetemperatureavhrrandinsiturecordsinsanmatiasgulfpatagoniaargentina
AT gagliardinidomingoa comparisonbetweenremotelysensedseasurfacetemperatureavhrrandinsiturecordsinsanmatiasgulfpatagoniaargentina
_version_ 1714205122251194368