Risk Preferences Estimation for Small Raspberry Producers in the Bío-Bío Region, Chile

Decisions are strongly influenced by risk and risk preferences of decision makers; however, in Chile there are few studies in the agricultural sector focused on this topic. The present paper analyzes the risk preferences of small producers of raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) and the production function...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toledo T,Roger, Engler P,Alejandra
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392008000200007
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-58392008000200007
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-583920080002000072018-10-01Risk Preferences Estimation for Small Raspberry Producers in the Bío-Bío Region, ChileToledo T,RogerEngler P,Alejandra risk aversion mean-variance utility function production function Decisions are strongly influenced by risk and risk preferences of decision makers; however, in Chile there are few studies in the agricultural sector focused on this topic. The present paper analyzes the risk preferences of small producers of raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) and the production function associated with their production system in the Bio-Bio Region of Chile. Under a mean-variance approach, the estimation procedure uses a flexible utility function to incorporate a variety of risk preference alternatives. Three different estimation procedures were used: Least Squares Estimation, Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Full Information Maximum Likelihood, which revealed the same conclusions. Results showed that small farmers are risk averse (&#947; = 0.104) and present increasing relative and absolute aversion to risk (&#952; = 0.099 < 1 and &#952; < &#947;, respectively). The hypotheses of risk neutrality (&#947; = 0) and constant absolute risk aversion (&#952; = 1) were rejected with 94% and 99% confidence, respectively. The chosen function of production is the Cobb Douglas type, because it presents a better adjustment, and the relevant factors are fertilizer quantity per hectare, the experience of the producer and the planted area. This function presents decreasing returns to scale, then &#946;2 + &#946;3 + &#946;4 is equal to 0.18. The hypothesis of constant returns to scale is rejected with 99% confidence.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIAChilean journal of agricultural research v.68 n.2 20082008-06-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392008000200007en10.4067/S0718-58392008000200007
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic risk aversion
mean-variance utility function
production function
spellingShingle risk aversion
mean-variance utility function
production function
Toledo T,Roger
Engler P,Alejandra
Risk Preferences Estimation for Small Raspberry Producers in the Bío-Bío Region, Chile
description Decisions are strongly influenced by risk and risk preferences of decision makers; however, in Chile there are few studies in the agricultural sector focused on this topic. The present paper analyzes the risk preferences of small producers of raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) and the production function associated with their production system in the Bio-Bio Region of Chile. Under a mean-variance approach, the estimation procedure uses a flexible utility function to incorporate a variety of risk preference alternatives. Three different estimation procedures were used: Least Squares Estimation, Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Full Information Maximum Likelihood, which revealed the same conclusions. Results showed that small farmers are risk averse (&#947; = 0.104) and present increasing relative and absolute aversion to risk (&#952; = 0.099 < 1 and &#952; < &#947;, respectively). The hypotheses of risk neutrality (&#947; = 0) and constant absolute risk aversion (&#952; = 1) were rejected with 94% and 99% confidence, respectively. The chosen function of production is the Cobb Douglas type, because it presents a better adjustment, and the relevant factors are fertilizer quantity per hectare, the experience of the producer and the planted area. This function presents decreasing returns to scale, then &#946;2 + &#946;3 + &#946;4 is equal to 0.18. The hypothesis of constant returns to scale is rejected with 99% confidence.
author Toledo T,Roger
Engler P,Alejandra
author_facet Toledo T,Roger
Engler P,Alejandra
author_sort Toledo T,Roger
title Risk Preferences Estimation for Small Raspberry Producers in the Bío-Bío Region, Chile
title_short Risk Preferences Estimation for Small Raspberry Producers in the Bío-Bío Region, Chile
title_full Risk Preferences Estimation for Small Raspberry Producers in the Bío-Bío Region, Chile
title_fullStr Risk Preferences Estimation for Small Raspberry Producers in the Bío-Bío Region, Chile
title_full_unstemmed Risk Preferences Estimation for Small Raspberry Producers in the Bío-Bío Region, Chile
title_sort risk preferences estimation for small raspberry producers in the bío-bío region, chile
publisher Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA
publishDate 2008
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392008000200007
work_keys_str_mv AT toledotroger riskpreferencesestimationforsmallraspberryproducersinthebiobioregionchile
AT englerpalejandra riskpreferencesestimationforsmallraspberryproducersinthebiobioregionchile
_version_ 1714205260424151040