Genotype × Environment Interaction in Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield in Chile

Genotype x environment (G × E) interaction in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivar seed yield is unknown in Chile. The interaction was performed with the SREG (Sites Regression) model. Two experiments were conducted in five and thirteen environments in the 2008-2009 season in Central South Chile. The...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escobar,Magaly, Berti,Marisol, Matus,Iván, Tapia,Maritza, Johnson,Burton
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA 2011
Materias:
GGE
MET
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392011000200001
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-58392011000200001
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-583920110002000012018-10-01Genotype × Environment Interaction in Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield in ChileEscobar,MagalyBerti,MarisolMatus,IvánTapia,MaritzaJohnson,Burton SREG GGE MET interaction biomass Genotype x environment (G × E) interaction in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivar seed yield is unknown in Chile. The interaction was performed with the SREG (Sites Regression) model. Two experiments were conducted in five and thirteen environments in the 2008-2009 season in Central South Chile. The experimental design was a randomized complete block (RCBD) in each environment with four replicates and 26 open-pollinated or hybrid canola genotypes in Experiment 1, and RCBD with three replicates and 17 genotypes in Experiment 2. ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the G × E interaction. biplots were used to graphically interpret and determine the best cultivar in each environment and the corresponding mega-environments. The G × E interaction was significant for seed yield in many locations in one cropping season. Most of the analyzed seed yield variation was due to environment and G × E effects. Principal components (PC1 and PC2) of the Sites Regression (SREG) model, with five and eight environments, accumulated 74.5% and 61.1% of the total variation, respectively. Two mega-environments were formed; the first being the Chillán environment while the second included the remaining environments. Six of the evaluated cultivars, all hybrids except ’Goya’, were superior. The mean vs. stability analysis indicated that the Monalisa hybrid had the highest yield and was the most stable cultivar across all environments. Although the information is for only 1 yr, results could change with data from several years of experimentation. Hence, the study was carried out in many locations in order to provide validity to the results.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIAChilean journal of agricultural research v.71 n.2 20112011-06-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392011000200001en10.4067/S0718-58392011000200001
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic SREG
GGE
MET
interaction
biomass
spellingShingle SREG
GGE
MET
interaction
biomass
Escobar,Magaly
Berti,Marisol
Matus,Iván
Tapia,Maritza
Johnson,Burton
Genotype × Environment Interaction in Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield in Chile
description Genotype x environment (G × E) interaction in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivar seed yield is unknown in Chile. The interaction was performed with the SREG (Sites Regression) model. Two experiments were conducted in five and thirteen environments in the 2008-2009 season in Central South Chile. The experimental design was a randomized complete block (RCBD) in each environment with four replicates and 26 open-pollinated or hybrid canola genotypes in Experiment 1, and RCBD with three replicates and 17 genotypes in Experiment 2. ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the G × E interaction. biplots were used to graphically interpret and determine the best cultivar in each environment and the corresponding mega-environments. The G × E interaction was significant for seed yield in many locations in one cropping season. Most of the analyzed seed yield variation was due to environment and G × E effects. Principal components (PC1 and PC2) of the Sites Regression (SREG) model, with five and eight environments, accumulated 74.5% and 61.1% of the total variation, respectively. Two mega-environments were formed; the first being the Chillán environment while the second included the remaining environments. Six of the evaluated cultivars, all hybrids except ’Goya’, were superior. The mean vs. stability analysis indicated that the Monalisa hybrid had the highest yield and was the most stable cultivar across all environments. Although the information is for only 1 yr, results could change with data from several years of experimentation. Hence, the study was carried out in many locations in order to provide validity to the results.
author Escobar,Magaly
Berti,Marisol
Matus,Iván
Tapia,Maritza
Johnson,Burton
author_facet Escobar,Magaly
Berti,Marisol
Matus,Iván
Tapia,Maritza
Johnson,Burton
author_sort Escobar,Magaly
title Genotype × Environment Interaction in Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield in Chile
title_short Genotype × Environment Interaction in Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield in Chile
title_full Genotype × Environment Interaction in Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield in Chile
title_fullStr Genotype × Environment Interaction in Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield in Chile
title_full_unstemmed Genotype × Environment Interaction in Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield in Chile
title_sort genotype × environment interaction in canola (brassica napus l.) seed yield in chile
publisher Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA
publishDate 2011
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392011000200001
work_keys_str_mv AT escobarmagaly genotypeenvironmentinteractionincanolabrassicanapuslseedyieldinchile
AT bertimarisol genotypeenvironmentinteractionincanolabrassicanapuslseedyieldinchile
AT matusivan genotypeenvironmentinteractionincanolabrassicanapuslseedyieldinchile
AT tapiamaritza genotypeenvironmentinteractionincanolabrassicanapuslseedyieldinchile
AT johnsonburton genotypeenvironmentinteractionincanolabrassicanapuslseedyieldinchile
_version_ 1714205294081343488