Soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on Chilean vineyards

Lifecycle of phytoparasitic nematode takes place in the rhizosphere, therefore their breeding, parasitism and mobility dynamics are inevitably influenced by the soil-root interaction, A study was performed to evaluate the influence of Vitis rootstocks to some plant parasitic nematodes under differen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fajardo P,Mario, Aballay E,Erwin, Casanova P,Manuel
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA 2011
Materias:
SO4
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392011000200009
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-58392011000200009
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-583920110002000092018-10-01Soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on Chilean vineyardsFajardo P,MarioAballay E,ErwinCasanova P,Manuel Nematodes rootstocks K5BB SO4 Chardonnay rizosphere soil Lifecycle of phytoparasitic nematode takes place in the rhizosphere, therefore their breeding, parasitism and mobility dynamics are inevitably influenced by the soil-root interaction, A study was performed to evaluate the influence of Vitis rootstocks to some plant parasitic nematodes under different soil conditions. Nematode populations were assessed in Vitis vinifera L. var ’Chardonnay’ plants grafted on two rootstocks (K5BB, SO4) and ungrafted ’Chardonnay’ as a control in three diferent alluvial soils in the central zone of Chile. Soils were two Inceptisols of the Casablanca Valley (Valparaíso Region), the first one without soil structure and with a densification zone in depth (S1) and the second one with sandy textural class (S3). A third soil was a Mollisol (S2) more structured than the others, situated on a locality of Melipilla (Metropolitan Region). The soils were characterized physically and morphologically and nematode genera were identified and counted using a dissecting microscope. ’Chardonnay’ presented the highest population of Meloidogyne spp. on the three soil conditions but only significant in S2 soil. The population of Xiphinema spp. and Mesocriconema xenoplax were not representative enough to relate them with either soil or the different rootstocks. The amount of Meloidogyne spp. was inversely related with the sand content but positively related with the more structured soil. The stepwise regressions resulted useful when relating nematode populations with multiple soil factors.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIAChilean journal of agricultural research v.71 n.2 20112011-06-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392011000200009en10.4067/S0718-58392011000200009
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Nematodes
rootstocks
K5BB
SO4
Chardonnay
rizosphere soil
spellingShingle Nematodes
rootstocks
K5BB
SO4
Chardonnay
rizosphere soil
Fajardo P,Mario
Aballay E,Erwin
Casanova P,Manuel
Soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on Chilean vineyards
description Lifecycle of phytoparasitic nematode takes place in the rhizosphere, therefore their breeding, parasitism and mobility dynamics are inevitably influenced by the soil-root interaction, A study was performed to evaluate the influence of Vitis rootstocks to some plant parasitic nematodes under different soil conditions. Nematode populations were assessed in Vitis vinifera L. var ’Chardonnay’ plants grafted on two rootstocks (K5BB, SO4) and ungrafted ’Chardonnay’ as a control in three diferent alluvial soils in the central zone of Chile. Soils were two Inceptisols of the Casablanca Valley (Valparaíso Region), the first one without soil structure and with a densification zone in depth (S1) and the second one with sandy textural class (S3). A third soil was a Mollisol (S2) more structured than the others, situated on a locality of Melipilla (Metropolitan Region). The soils were characterized physically and morphologically and nematode genera were identified and counted using a dissecting microscope. ’Chardonnay’ presented the highest population of Meloidogyne spp. on the three soil conditions but only significant in S2 soil. The population of Xiphinema spp. and Mesocriconema xenoplax were not representative enough to relate them with either soil or the different rootstocks. The amount of Meloidogyne spp. was inversely related with the sand content but positively related with the more structured soil. The stepwise regressions resulted useful when relating nematode populations with multiple soil factors.
author Fajardo P,Mario
Aballay E,Erwin
Casanova P,Manuel
author_facet Fajardo P,Mario
Aballay E,Erwin
Casanova P,Manuel
author_sort Fajardo P,Mario
title Soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on Chilean vineyards
title_short Soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on Chilean vineyards
title_full Soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on Chilean vineyards
title_fullStr Soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on Chilean vineyards
title_full_unstemmed Soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on Chilean vineyards
title_sort soil properties influencing phytoparasitic nematode population on chilean vineyards
publisher Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA
publishDate 2011
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392011000200009
work_keys_str_mv AT fajardopmario soilpropertiesinfluencingphytoparasiticnematodepopulationonchileanvineyards
AT aballayeerwin soilpropertiesinfluencingphytoparasiticnematodepopulationonchileanvineyards
AT casanovapmanuel soilpropertiesinfluencingphytoparasiticnematodepopulationonchileanvineyards
_version_ 1714205295410937856