The effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (MBM) applied every second year on maize grown for grain

Recently, due to the detection of cases of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, it has become necessary to use animal meals differently. The EU Council Decision of 4 December 2000 forbade use of processed animal protein to make feeds for cattle, swine, and poultry. Meat and bone meal (M...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nogalska,Anna, Skwierawska,Matgorzata, Nogalski,Zenon, Kaszuba,Monika
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA 2013
Materias:
TGW
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392013000400015
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-58392013000400015
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-583920130004000152018-10-02The effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (MBM) applied every second year on maize grown for grainNogalska,AnnaSkwierawska,MatgorzataNogalski,ZenonKaszuba,Monika Grain yield macronutrients meat and bone meal uptake TGW Tea mays Recently, due to the detection of cases of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, it has become necessary to use animal meals differently. The EU Council Decision of 4 December 2000 forbade use of processed animal protein to make feeds for cattle, swine, and poultry. Meat and bone meal (MBM) is rich in macro- and microelements as well as in organic substance, and hence it can be a viable alternative to mineral fertilizers containing N and P. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of increasing doses of MBM applied every second year as an organic fertilizer on maize (Tea mays L.) grown for grain. A two-factorial field experiment with a randomized block design was carried out in 20102011, in north-eastern Poland. Experimental factor I was MBM dose (2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 Mg ha-1 applied every second year), and experimental factor II was the year of the study (two consecutive years). Increasing MBM doses applied every second year increased maize grain yield and improved grain plumpness, in comparison with mineral fertilization. The highest yield-forming effect was observed when MBM was applied at 3 Mg ha-1. Macronutrient uptake by maize plants and macronutrient concentrations in maize grain were affected by the year of the study rather than MBM dose. The results of a 2-yr experiment indicate that MBM is a valuable source of N and P for maize grown for grain, and that it is equally or more effective when compared with mineral fertilizers.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIAChilean journal of agricultural research v.73 n.4 20132013-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392013000400015en10.4067/S0718-58392013000400015
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Grain yield
macronutrients
meat and bone meal
uptake
TGW
Tea mays
spellingShingle Grain yield
macronutrients
meat and bone meal
uptake
TGW
Tea mays
Nogalska,Anna
Skwierawska,Matgorzata
Nogalski,Zenon
Kaszuba,Monika
The effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (MBM) applied every second year on maize grown for grain
description Recently, due to the detection of cases of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, it has become necessary to use animal meals differently. The EU Council Decision of 4 December 2000 forbade use of processed animal protein to make feeds for cattle, swine, and poultry. Meat and bone meal (MBM) is rich in macro- and microelements as well as in organic substance, and hence it can be a viable alternative to mineral fertilizers containing N and P. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of increasing doses of MBM applied every second year as an organic fertilizer on maize (Tea mays L.) grown for grain. A two-factorial field experiment with a randomized block design was carried out in 20102011, in north-eastern Poland. Experimental factor I was MBM dose (2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 Mg ha-1 applied every second year), and experimental factor II was the year of the study (two consecutive years). Increasing MBM doses applied every second year increased maize grain yield and improved grain plumpness, in comparison with mineral fertilization. The highest yield-forming effect was observed when MBM was applied at 3 Mg ha-1. Macronutrient uptake by maize plants and macronutrient concentrations in maize grain were affected by the year of the study rather than MBM dose. The results of a 2-yr experiment indicate that MBM is a valuable source of N and P for maize grown for grain, and that it is equally or more effective when compared with mineral fertilizers.
author Nogalska,Anna
Skwierawska,Matgorzata
Nogalski,Zenon
Kaszuba,Monika
author_facet Nogalska,Anna
Skwierawska,Matgorzata
Nogalski,Zenon
Kaszuba,Monika
author_sort Nogalska,Anna
title The effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (MBM) applied every second year on maize grown for grain
title_short The effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (MBM) applied every second year on maize grown for grain
title_full The effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (MBM) applied every second year on maize grown for grain
title_fullStr The effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (MBM) applied every second year on maize grown for grain
title_full_unstemmed The effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (MBM) applied every second year on maize grown for grain
title_sort effect of increasing doses of meat and bone meal (mbm) applied every second year on maize grown for grain
publisher Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA
publishDate 2013
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392013000400015
work_keys_str_mv AT nogalskaanna theeffectofincreasingdosesofmeatandbonemealmbmappliedeverysecondyearonmaizegrownforgrain
AT skwierawskamatgorzata theeffectofincreasingdosesofmeatandbonemealmbmappliedeverysecondyearonmaizegrownforgrain
AT nogalskizenon theeffectofincreasingdosesofmeatandbonemealmbmappliedeverysecondyearonmaizegrownforgrain
AT kaszubamonika theeffectofincreasingdosesofmeatandbonemealmbmappliedeverysecondyearonmaizegrownforgrain
AT nogalskaanna effectofincreasingdosesofmeatandbonemealmbmappliedeverysecondyearonmaizegrownforgrain
AT skwierawskamatgorzata effectofincreasingdosesofmeatandbonemealmbmappliedeverysecondyearonmaizegrownforgrain
AT nogalskizenon effectofincreasingdosesofmeatandbonemealmbmappliedeverysecondyearonmaizegrownforgrain
AT kaszubamonika effectofincreasingdosesofmeatandbonemealmbmappliedeverysecondyearonmaizegrownforgrain
_version_ 1714205329711955968