Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques

Effective water use should be investigated in terms of sustainable production strategy in arid and semi-arid regions. A 2 yr field study was conducted in order to investigate the effects of full root-zone wetting (FI) and partial root-zone drying (PRD) irrigation techniques with 4 and 8-d (I2) irrig...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahin,Ustun, Ors,Selda, Kiziloglu,Fatih M, Kuslu,Yasemin
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392014000300008
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-58392014000300008
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-583920140003000082018-10-01Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniquesSahin,UstunOrs,SeldaKiziloglu,Fatih MKuslu,Yasemin Beta vulgaris partial root-zone drying irrigation sugar yield water productivity water-yield relationships Effective water use should be investigated in terms of sustainable production strategy in arid and semi-arid regions. A 2 yr field study was conducted in order to investigate the effects of full root-zone wetting (FI) and partial root-zone drying (PRD) irrigation techniques with 4 and 8-d (I2) irrigation intervals and three different irrigation levels (W1, W2, W3) adjusted according to Class A pan evaporation on root, leaf, and sugar yields and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Three different plant-pan coefficients (0.70, 0.60, and 0.50) were used for adjusting the three different irrigation levels. The irrigation techniques and levels affected yields significantly. Seasonal meanly irrigation quantities were 280.4 mm in FI treatments and 162.4 mm in PRD treatments. While mean root yield of 33.80 t ha-1 is obtained in FI treatments, it was 26.43 t ha-1 in PRD treatments. Similarly, mean white sugar yield (WSY) for FI treatments (5 t ha-1) was higher than PRD treatments (3.81 t ha-1). There were significant polynomial relationships between irrigation quantities and root yield or WSY in both FI and PRD treatment. PRD technique increased by 34.9% IWUE compared to FI. Although the highest root yield was determined in FI-I1W1 sub treatment as 37.57 t ha-1, the highest IWUE was determined in PRD-I1W3 sub treatment as 173.9 kg ha-1 mm-1 since it has the lowest irrigation water amount as 140.6 mm. However, among PRD treatments for more root yield and for more white sugar yield, I1W1 and I1W2 sub treatments were the best.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIAChilean journal of agricultural research v.74 n.3 20142014-09-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392014000300008en10.4067/S0718-58392014000300008
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Beta vulgaris
partial root-zone drying irrigation
sugar yield
water productivity
water-yield relationships
spellingShingle Beta vulgaris
partial root-zone drying irrigation
sugar yield
water productivity
water-yield relationships
Sahin,Ustun
Ors,Selda
Kiziloglu,Fatih M
Kuslu,Yasemin
Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques
description Effective water use should be investigated in terms of sustainable production strategy in arid and semi-arid regions. A 2 yr field study was conducted in order to investigate the effects of full root-zone wetting (FI) and partial root-zone drying (PRD) irrigation techniques with 4 and 8-d (I2) irrigation intervals and three different irrigation levels (W1, W2, W3) adjusted according to Class A pan evaporation on root, leaf, and sugar yields and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Three different plant-pan coefficients (0.70, 0.60, and 0.50) were used for adjusting the three different irrigation levels. The irrigation techniques and levels affected yields significantly. Seasonal meanly irrigation quantities were 280.4 mm in FI treatments and 162.4 mm in PRD treatments. While mean root yield of 33.80 t ha-1 is obtained in FI treatments, it was 26.43 t ha-1 in PRD treatments. Similarly, mean white sugar yield (WSY) for FI treatments (5 t ha-1) was higher than PRD treatments (3.81 t ha-1). There were significant polynomial relationships between irrigation quantities and root yield or WSY in both FI and PRD treatment. PRD technique increased by 34.9% IWUE compared to FI. Although the highest root yield was determined in FI-I1W1 sub treatment as 37.57 t ha-1, the highest IWUE was determined in PRD-I1W3 sub treatment as 173.9 kg ha-1 mm-1 since it has the lowest irrigation water amount as 140.6 mm. However, among PRD treatments for more root yield and for more white sugar yield, I1W1 and I1W2 sub treatments were the best.
author Sahin,Ustun
Ors,Selda
Kiziloglu,Fatih M
Kuslu,Yasemin
author_facet Sahin,Ustun
Ors,Selda
Kiziloglu,Fatih M
Kuslu,Yasemin
author_sort Sahin,Ustun
title Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques
title_short Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques
title_full Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques
title_fullStr Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques
title_sort evaluation of water use and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different irrigation techniques
publisher Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392014000300008
work_keys_str_mv AT sahinustun evaluationofwateruseandyieldresponsesofdripirrigatedsugarbeetwithdifferentirrigationtechniques
AT orsselda evaluationofwateruseandyieldresponsesofdripirrigatedsugarbeetwithdifferentirrigationtechniques
AT kiziloglufatihm evaluationofwateruseandyieldresponsesofdripirrigatedsugarbeetwithdifferentirrigationtechniques
AT kusluyasemin evaluationofwateruseandyieldresponsesofdripirrigatedsugarbeetwithdifferentirrigationtechniques
_version_ 1714205337375997952