Impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ECP projects cost control

Abstract Engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contracts are the most widespread way to carry out the execution of complex projects. Under an EPC contract modality, the contractor must must complete the installation at a guaranteed price and by a specific date, while reaching the agreed l...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prendes-Gero,María-Belén, González-Nicieza,Celestino, Ordiales-Martínez,Víctor, Álvarez-Fernández,Martina-Inmaculada
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escuela de Construcción Civil, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-915X2019000300418
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-915X2019000300418
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-915X20190003004182020-02-04Impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ECP projects cost controlPrendes-Gero,María-BelénGonzález-Nicieza,CelestinoOrdiales-Martínez,VíctorÁlvarez-Fernández,Martina-Inmaculada failure regulations cost control rehabilitation penalty fee Abstract Engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contracts are the most widespread way to carry out the execution of complex projects. Under an EPC contract modality, the contractor must must complete the installation at a guaranteed price and by a specific date, while reaching the agreed level of quality and performance for the installation. Failure to comply with any of the above requirements usually results in the application of economic penalties. Therefore, the main problem of a fixed price EPC contract is that any unexpected problem will be reflected in the final economic result of the contract. There are three main problems that can endanger the final result: a) Unexpected failure that does not represent a time delay but involves the rehabilitation costs; b) Unexpected failure that endangers the facility delivery date and therefore involves a penalty fee; c) Erroneous selection of the involved regulations in the design of the project. Since the exposed problems are quite common, the aim of this paper is to give an approach, in economic terms, of the unexpected costs related to geotechnical issues. This analysis will be carried out using three real EPC construction projects. The selected examples will cover different perspectives: Case 1; the main cost is the execution of the rehabilitation. Case 2; the main cost is the penalty fee due to start up delay. Case 3; the cost depends on the applicable regulations.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEscuela de Construcción Civil, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileRevista de la construcción v.18 n.3 20192019-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-915X2019000300418en10.7764/rdlc.18.3.418
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic failure
regulations
cost control
rehabilitation
penalty fee
spellingShingle failure
regulations
cost control
rehabilitation
penalty fee
Prendes-Gero,María-Belén
González-Nicieza,Celestino
Ordiales-Martínez,Víctor
Álvarez-Fernández,Martina-Inmaculada
Impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ECP projects cost control
description Abstract Engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contracts are the most widespread way to carry out the execution of complex projects. Under an EPC contract modality, the contractor must must complete the installation at a guaranteed price and by a specific date, while reaching the agreed level of quality and performance for the installation. Failure to comply with any of the above requirements usually results in the application of economic penalties. Therefore, the main problem of a fixed price EPC contract is that any unexpected problem will be reflected in the final economic result of the contract. There are three main problems that can endanger the final result: a) Unexpected failure that does not represent a time delay but involves the rehabilitation costs; b) Unexpected failure that endangers the facility delivery date and therefore involves a penalty fee; c) Erroneous selection of the involved regulations in the design of the project. Since the exposed problems are quite common, the aim of this paper is to give an approach, in economic terms, of the unexpected costs related to geotechnical issues. This analysis will be carried out using three real EPC construction projects. The selected examples will cover different perspectives: Case 1; the main cost is the execution of the rehabilitation. Case 2; the main cost is the penalty fee due to start up delay. Case 3; the cost depends on the applicable regulations.
author Prendes-Gero,María-Belén
González-Nicieza,Celestino
Ordiales-Martínez,Víctor
Álvarez-Fernández,Martina-Inmaculada
author_facet Prendes-Gero,María-Belén
González-Nicieza,Celestino
Ordiales-Martínez,Víctor
Álvarez-Fernández,Martina-Inmaculada
author_sort Prendes-Gero,María-Belén
title Impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ECP projects cost control
title_short Impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ECP projects cost control
title_full Impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ECP projects cost control
title_fullStr Impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ECP projects cost control
title_full_unstemmed Impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ECP projects cost control
title_sort impact analysis of geotechnical occurrences in ecp projects cost control
publisher Escuela de Construcción Civil, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
publishDate 2019
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-915X2019000300418
work_keys_str_mv AT prendesgeromariabelen impactanalysisofgeotechnicaloccurrencesinecpprojectscostcontrol
AT gonzalezniciezacelestino impactanalysisofgeotechnicaloccurrencesinecpprojectscostcontrol
AT ordialesmartinezvictor impactanalysisofgeotechnicaloccurrencesinecpprojectscostcontrol
AT alvarezfernandezmartinainmaculada impactanalysisofgeotechnicaloccurrencesinecpprojectscostcontrol
_version_ 1714206301067673600