Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants

The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of applying microcapsules and liquid inoculation of three Pseudomonas putida strains on growth and yield of tomato plants in greenhouse where the results showed differences between both treatments. Rhizobacterial strainsFA-8, FA-56, and FA-...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández-Montiel,Luis G, Chiquito Contreras,César J, Murillo Amador,Bernardo, Vidal Hernández,Librado, Quiñones Aguilar,Evanjelina E, Chiquito Contreras,Roberto G
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chilean Society of Soil Science / Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del Suelo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-95162017000400012
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0718-95162017000400012
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0718-951620170004000122017-12-20Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plantsHernández-Montiel,Luis GChiquito Contreras,César JMurillo Amador,BernardoVidal Hernández,LibradoQuiñones Aguilar,Evanjelina EChiquito Contreras,Roberto G Alginate microcapsules indoleacetic acid rhizobacteria PGPR The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of applying microcapsules and liquid inoculation of three Pseudomonas putida strains on growth and yield of tomato plants in greenhouse where the results showed differences between both treatments. Rhizobacterial strainsFA-8, FA-56, and FA-60 of P. putida, were assessed individually and combined to determine their capacity to produce indoleacetic acid (IAA). The three strains demonstrated the capacity to produce IAAin vitro, of which FA-56 stood out with 23.02 µg mL-1 in the microcapsule treatment with significant increases in plant height, stem diameter, radical volume, dry biomass, fruit yield, and rhizobacterial population (CFU). These responses could have been associated to the intrinsic capacity of this strain to produce a greater amount of IAA, hormone related to promoting plant growth. The use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as biofertilizers by means of microcapsules could be an alternative in agricultural management and sustainable production of tomato. Immobilization of P. putidarhizobacteria by alginate microcapsules confers protection and gradual release, improving adhesion, permanency, and colonization of cells on the roots, promoting a better effect as PGPR and productivity in tomato plants.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChilean Society of Soil Science / Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del SueloJournal of soil science and plant nutrition v.17 n.4 20172017-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-95162017000400012en10.4067/S0718-95162017000400012
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Alginate microcapsules
indoleacetic acid
rhizobacteria
PGPR
spellingShingle Alginate microcapsules
indoleacetic acid
rhizobacteria
PGPR
Hernández-Montiel,Luis G
Chiquito Contreras,César J
Murillo Amador,Bernardo
Vidal Hernández,Librado
Quiñones Aguilar,Evanjelina E
Chiquito Contreras,Roberto G
Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants
description The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of applying microcapsules and liquid inoculation of three Pseudomonas putida strains on growth and yield of tomato plants in greenhouse where the results showed differences between both treatments. Rhizobacterial strainsFA-8, FA-56, and FA-60 of P. putida, were assessed individually and combined to determine their capacity to produce indoleacetic acid (IAA). The three strains demonstrated the capacity to produce IAAin vitro, of which FA-56 stood out with 23.02 µg mL-1 in the microcapsule treatment with significant increases in plant height, stem diameter, radical volume, dry biomass, fruit yield, and rhizobacterial population (CFU). These responses could have been associated to the intrinsic capacity of this strain to produce a greater amount of IAA, hormone related to promoting plant growth. The use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as biofertilizers by means of microcapsules could be an alternative in agricultural management and sustainable production of tomato. Immobilization of P. putidarhizobacteria by alginate microcapsules confers protection and gradual release, improving adhesion, permanency, and colonization of cells on the roots, promoting a better effect as PGPR and productivity in tomato plants.
author Hernández-Montiel,Luis G
Chiquito Contreras,César J
Murillo Amador,Bernardo
Vidal Hernández,Librado
Quiñones Aguilar,Evanjelina E
Chiquito Contreras,Roberto G
author_facet Hernández-Montiel,Luis G
Chiquito Contreras,César J
Murillo Amador,Bernardo
Vidal Hernández,Librado
Quiñones Aguilar,Evanjelina E
Chiquito Contreras,Roberto G
author_sort Hernández-Montiel,Luis G
title Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants
title_short Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants
title_full Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants
title_fullStr Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants
title_sort efficiency of two inoculation methods of pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants
publisher Chilean Society of Soil Science / Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del Suelo
publishDate 2017
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-95162017000400012
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezmontielluisg efficiencyoftwoinoculationmethodsofpseudomonasputidaongrowthandyieldoftomatoplants
AT chiquitocontrerascesarj efficiencyoftwoinoculationmethodsofpseudomonasputidaongrowthandyieldoftomatoplants
AT murilloamadorbernardo efficiencyoftwoinoculationmethodsofpseudomonasputidaongrowthandyieldoftomatoplants
AT vidalhernandezlibrado efficiencyoftwoinoculationmethodsofpseudomonasputidaongrowthandyieldoftomatoplants
AT quinonesaguilarevanjelinae efficiencyoftwoinoculationmethodsofpseudomonasputidaongrowthandyieldoftomatoplants
AT chiquitocontrerasrobertog efficiencyoftwoinoculationmethodsofpseudomonasputidaongrowthandyieldoftomatoplants
_version_ 1714206562634956800