The Right to Be Forgotten versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal Considerations

Abstract: 15. The anonymity of gamete donors in the context of medically-assisted reproduction techniques (ART) and the right of the offspring to know their genetic or biological parents’ identity is a controversial and widely debated topic in the scientific literature. The positions on th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Correia,Mónica, Rego,Guilhermina, Nunes,Rui
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Bioética, Universidad de Chile 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-569X2021000100069
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S1726-569X2021000100069
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S1726-569X20210001000692021-06-10The Right to Be Forgotten versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal ConsiderationsCorreia,MónicaRego,GuilherminaNunes,Rui anonymity disclosure ethics gamete donation privacy ‘right to be forgotten’ Abstract: 15. The anonymity of gamete donors in the context of medically-assisted reproduction techniques (ART) and the right of the offspring to know their genetic or biological parents’ identity is a controversial and widely debated topic in the scientific literature. The positions on the issue in each country are different. Sometimes they are in opposition to each other even in countries with strong similarities, such as those in the European Union (EU), in the framework of shared ethical values. Although some countries still enshrine the rule of anonymity, there is an undeniable tendency to guarantee the right to know one’s origins by creating relevant exceptions or abolishing donor anonymity status altogether. 16. This article offers ethical and legal considerations of whether the so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ (RTBF) could be extended to include gamete donors’ right to remain anonymous. This perspective goes against the general trend, certainly in Europe, of recognizing that offspring born from donor gametes have a right to access information relating to their genetic progenitors. The novel addition is to question whether the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) might provide fertile ground for questioning this approach, and effectively support those jurisdictions where anonymity is still possible.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCentro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Bioética, Universidad de ChileActa bioethica v.27 n.1 20212021-06-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-569X2021000100069en10.4067/S1726-569X2021000100069
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic anonymity
disclosure
ethics
gamete donation
privacy
‘right to be forgotten’
spellingShingle anonymity
disclosure
ethics
gamete donation
privacy
‘right to be forgotten’
Correia,Mónica
Rego,Guilhermina
Nunes,Rui
The Right to Be Forgotten versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal Considerations
description Abstract: 15. The anonymity of gamete donors in the context of medically-assisted reproduction techniques (ART) and the right of the offspring to know their genetic or biological parents’ identity is a controversial and widely debated topic in the scientific literature. The positions on the issue in each country are different. Sometimes they are in opposition to each other even in countries with strong similarities, such as those in the European Union (EU), in the framework of shared ethical values. Although some countries still enshrine the rule of anonymity, there is an undeniable tendency to guarantee the right to know one’s origins by creating relevant exceptions or abolishing donor anonymity status altogether. 16. This article offers ethical and legal considerations of whether the so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ (RTBF) could be extended to include gamete donors’ right to remain anonymous. This perspective goes against the general trend, certainly in Europe, of recognizing that offspring born from donor gametes have a right to access information relating to their genetic progenitors. The novel addition is to question whether the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) might provide fertile ground for questioning this approach, and effectively support those jurisdictions where anonymity is still possible.
author Correia,Mónica
Rego,Guilhermina
Nunes,Rui
author_facet Correia,Mónica
Rego,Guilhermina
Nunes,Rui
author_sort Correia,Mónica
title The Right to Be Forgotten versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal Considerations
title_short The Right to Be Forgotten versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal Considerations
title_full The Right to Be Forgotten versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal Considerations
title_fullStr The Right to Be Forgotten versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal Considerations
title_full_unstemmed The Right to Be Forgotten versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal Considerations
title_sort right to be forgotten versus the right to disclosure of gamete donors’ id: ethical and legal considerations
publisher Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Bioética, Universidad de Chile
publishDate 2021
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-569X2021000100069
work_keys_str_mv AT correiamonica therighttobeforgottenversustherighttodisclosureofgametedonors8217idethicalandlegalconsiderations
AT regoguilhermina therighttobeforgottenversustherighttodisclosureofgametedonors8217idethicalandlegalconsiderations
AT nunesrui therighttobeforgottenversustherighttodisclosureofgametedonors8217idethicalandlegalconsiderations
AT correiamonica righttobeforgottenversustherighttodisclosureofgametedonors8217idethicalandlegalconsiderations
AT regoguilhermina righttobeforgottenversustherighttodisclosureofgametedonors8217idethicalandlegalconsiderations
AT nunesrui righttobeforgottenversustherighttodisclosureofgametedonors8217idethicalandlegalconsiderations
_version_ 1714207403987173376