Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences

Abstract Metacognition comprises both the ability to be aware of one’s cognitive processes (metacognitive knowledge) and to regulate them (metacognitive control). Research in educational sciences has amassed a large body of evidence on the importance of metacognition in learning and academic achieve...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damien S. Fleur, Bert Bredeweg, Wouter van den Bos
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d0270
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d0270
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d02702021-12-02T17:52:25ZMetacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences10.1038/s41539-021-00089-52056-7936https://doaj.org/article/0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d02702021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5https://doaj.org/toc/2056-7936Abstract Metacognition comprises both the ability to be aware of one’s cognitive processes (metacognitive knowledge) and to regulate them (metacognitive control). Research in educational sciences has amassed a large body of evidence on the importance of metacognition in learning and academic achievement. More recently, metacognition has been studied from experimental and cognitive neuroscience perspectives. This research has started to identify brain regions that encode metacognitive processes. However, the educational and neuroscience disciplines have largely developed separately with little exchange and communication. In this article, we review the literature on metacognition in educational and cognitive neuroscience and identify entry points for synthesis. We argue that to improve our understanding of metacognition, future research needs to (i) investigate the degree to which different protocols relate to the similar or different metacognitive constructs and processes, (ii) implement experiments to identify neural substrates necessary for metacognition based on protocols used in educational sciences, (iii) study the effects of training metacognitive knowledge in the brain, and (iv) perform developmental research in the metacognitive brain and compare it with the existing developmental literature from educational sciences regarding the domain-generality of metacognition.Damien S. FleurBert BredewegWouter van den BosNature PortfolioarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENnpj Science of Learning, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Damien S. Fleur
Bert Bredeweg
Wouter van den Bos
Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
description Abstract Metacognition comprises both the ability to be aware of one’s cognitive processes (metacognitive knowledge) and to regulate them (metacognitive control). Research in educational sciences has amassed a large body of evidence on the importance of metacognition in learning and academic achievement. More recently, metacognition has been studied from experimental and cognitive neuroscience perspectives. This research has started to identify brain regions that encode metacognitive processes. However, the educational and neuroscience disciplines have largely developed separately with little exchange and communication. In this article, we review the literature on metacognition in educational and cognitive neuroscience and identify entry points for synthesis. We argue that to improve our understanding of metacognition, future research needs to (i) investigate the degree to which different protocols relate to the similar or different metacognitive constructs and processes, (ii) implement experiments to identify neural substrates necessary for metacognition based on protocols used in educational sciences, (iii) study the effects of training metacognitive knowledge in the brain, and (iv) perform developmental research in the metacognitive brain and compare it with the existing developmental literature from educational sciences regarding the domain-generality of metacognition.
format article
author Damien S. Fleur
Bert Bredeweg
Wouter van den Bos
author_facet Damien S. Fleur
Bert Bredeweg
Wouter van den Bos
author_sort Damien S. Fleur
title Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
title_short Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
title_full Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
title_fullStr Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
title_full_unstemmed Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
title_sort metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d0270
work_keys_str_mv AT damiensfleur metacognitionideasandinsightsfromneuroandeducationalsciences
AT bertbredeweg metacognitionideasandinsightsfromneuroandeducationalsciences
AT woutervandenbos metacognitionideasandinsightsfromneuroandeducationalsciences
_version_ 1718379208907948032