Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
Abstract Metacognition comprises both the ability to be aware of one’s cognitive processes (metacognitive knowledge) and to regulate them (metacognitive control). Research in educational sciences has amassed a large body of evidence on the importance of metacognition in learning and academic achieve...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d0270 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d0270 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d02702021-12-02T17:52:25ZMetacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences10.1038/s41539-021-00089-52056-7936https://doaj.org/article/0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d02702021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5https://doaj.org/toc/2056-7936Abstract Metacognition comprises both the ability to be aware of one’s cognitive processes (metacognitive knowledge) and to regulate them (metacognitive control). Research in educational sciences has amassed a large body of evidence on the importance of metacognition in learning and academic achievement. More recently, metacognition has been studied from experimental and cognitive neuroscience perspectives. This research has started to identify brain regions that encode metacognitive processes. However, the educational and neuroscience disciplines have largely developed separately with little exchange and communication. In this article, we review the literature on metacognition in educational and cognitive neuroscience and identify entry points for synthesis. We argue that to improve our understanding of metacognition, future research needs to (i) investigate the degree to which different protocols relate to the similar or different metacognitive constructs and processes, (ii) implement experiments to identify neural substrates necessary for metacognition based on protocols used in educational sciences, (iii) study the effects of training metacognitive knowledge in the brain, and (iv) perform developmental research in the metacognitive brain and compare it with the existing developmental literature from educational sciences regarding the domain-generality of metacognition.Damien S. FleurBert BredewegWouter van den BosNature PortfolioarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENnpj Science of Learning, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 |
spellingShingle |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Damien S. Fleur Bert Bredeweg Wouter van den Bos Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences |
description |
Abstract Metacognition comprises both the ability to be aware of one’s cognitive processes (metacognitive knowledge) and to regulate them (metacognitive control). Research in educational sciences has amassed a large body of evidence on the importance of metacognition in learning and academic achievement. More recently, metacognition has been studied from experimental and cognitive neuroscience perspectives. This research has started to identify brain regions that encode metacognitive processes. However, the educational and neuroscience disciplines have largely developed separately with little exchange and communication. In this article, we review the literature on metacognition in educational and cognitive neuroscience and identify entry points for synthesis. We argue that to improve our understanding of metacognition, future research needs to (i) investigate the degree to which different protocols relate to the similar or different metacognitive constructs and processes, (ii) implement experiments to identify neural substrates necessary for metacognition based on protocols used in educational sciences, (iii) study the effects of training metacognitive knowledge in the brain, and (iv) perform developmental research in the metacognitive brain and compare it with the existing developmental literature from educational sciences regarding the domain-generality of metacognition. |
format |
article |
author |
Damien S. Fleur Bert Bredeweg Wouter van den Bos |
author_facet |
Damien S. Fleur Bert Bredeweg Wouter van den Bos |
author_sort |
Damien S. Fleur |
title |
Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences |
title_short |
Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences |
title_full |
Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences |
title_fullStr |
Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences |
title_sort |
metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0339814650b1414b81e091b83e9d0270 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT damiensfleur metacognitionideasandinsightsfromneuroandeducationalsciences AT bertbredeweg metacognitionideasandinsightsfromneuroandeducationalsciences AT woutervandenbos metacognitionideasandinsightsfromneuroandeducationalsciences |
_version_ |
1718379208907948032 |