Spontaneous eye blinking as a diagnostic marker in prolonged disorders of consciousness

Abstract Clinical diagnosis of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness is very challenging. As spontaneous eye blink rate (EBR) is reliably correlated with cognitive activity in healthy individuals, we investigated whether EBR could serve as a marker of patients’ level of consciousness. W...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Alfonso Magliacano, Martin Rosenfelder, Nina Hieber, Andreas Bender, Anna Estraneo, Luigi Trojano
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Nature Portfolio 2021
Sujets:
R
Q
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/07b76a9a607b46a9a5273e3d98fdd1c5
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:Abstract Clinical diagnosis of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness is very challenging. As spontaneous eye blink rate (EBR) is reliably correlated with cognitive activity in healthy individuals, we investigated whether EBR could serve as a marker of patients’ level of consciousness. We assessed ten patients in prolonged Vegetative State/Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (VS/UWS; three females; mean age = 50.3 ± 17.8 years) and fourteen patients in Minimally Conscious State (MCS; three females; mean age = 52.9 ± 17.5 years) at their admission to a rehabilitation unit after the acute phase. During two separate 3-min rest conditions, we recorded patients’ EBR by integrating on-line visual and off-line electro-oculographic count. We also assessed EBR during two auditory oddball tasks, i.e. passive listening and active counting of target tones in a sub-group of patients. EBR was significantly higher in MCS than in VS/UWS; moreover, EBR positively correlated with a validated index of responsiveness derived from the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Patients’ mean EBR showed no significant differences within sessions and across experimental conditions of the oddball task, in both VS/UWS and MCS. Our findings suggest that, at least in the post-acute phase, observing patients’ EBR for 3 min at rest could help to discriminate between VS/UWS and MCS, improving accuracy of clinical diagnosis.