Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Bruno Giraudeau, Clémence Leyrat, Amélie Le Gouge, Julie Léger, Agnès Caille |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/08073fc95a8146b6aa4f3b92de6a834d |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Participant informed consent in cluster randomized trials: review.
by: Bruno Giraudeau, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Transparent Peer Review of Grant Applications
by: Jung Hun Lee, et al.
Published: (2021) -
An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
by: Richard K Nakamura, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Mixing nulliparous and multiparous women in randomised controlled trials of preeclampsia prevention is debatable: evidence from a systematic review.
by: Emmanuel Simon, et al.
Published: (2013) -
REVIEW: Manipulation that we now take for granted
by: Philip Cass
Published: (2012)