Demystifying the process of scholarly peer-review: an autoethnographic investigation of feedback literacy of two award-winning peer reviewers
Abstract Peer reviewers serve a vital role in assessing the value of published scholarship and improving the quality of submitted manuscripts. To provide more appropriate and systematic support to peer reviewers, especially those new to the role, this study documents the feedback practices and exper...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Sin Wang Chong, Shannon Mason |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/09653cd06adc4a719bbf8d7de1596ae3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction: Demystifying the process of scholarly peer-review: an autoethnographic investigation of feedback literacy of two award-winning peer reviewers
por: Sin Wang Chong, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Improving Submissions to Scholarly Journals via Peer Review
por: Lilia Raitskaya, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Unpacking Peer Collaborative Experiences in Pre-Class Learning of Flipped Classroom With a Production-Oriented Approach
por: Shu-Rong Zhao, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart
por: Eleanor Loughlin, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
por: Giangiacomo Bravo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)