Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

<h4>Background</h4>The UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed that metformin decreases mortality compared to diet alone in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since then, it has been the first-line treatment in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. However, metformin-sul...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rémy Boussageon, Irène Supper, Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant, Nadir Kellou, Michel Cucherat, Jean-Pierre Boissel, Behrouz Kassai, Alain Moreau, François Gueyffier, Catherine Cornu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/099e18ead147466e9febdcd0e87c4740
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:099e18ead147466e9febdcd0e87c4740
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:099e18ead147466e9febdcd0e87c47402021-12-02T19:55:48ZReappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1001204https://doaj.org/article/099e18ead147466e9febdcd0e87c47402012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22509138/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background</h4>The UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed that metformin decreases mortality compared to diet alone in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since then, it has been the first-line treatment in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. However, metformin-sulphonylurea bitherapy may increase mortality.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluated metformin efficacy (in studies of metformin versus diet alone, versus placebo, and versus no treatment; metformin as an add-on therapy; and metformin withdrawal) against cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database. Primary end points were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death. Secondary end points included all myocardial infarctions, all strokes, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, leg amputations, and microvascular complications. Thirteen randomised controlled trials (13,110 patients) were retrieved; 9,560 patients were given metformin, and 3,550 patients were given conventional treatment or placebo. Metformin did not significantly affect the primary outcomes all-cause mortality, risk ratio (RR)=0.99 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.31), and cardiovascular mortality, RR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.64). The secondary outcomes were also unaffected by metformin treatment: all myocardial infarctions, RR=0.90 (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.09); all strokes, RR=0.76 (95% CI: 0.51 to 1.14); heart failure, RR=1.03 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.59); peripheral vascular disease, RR=0.90 (95% CI: 0.46 to 1.78); leg amputations, RR=1.04 (95% CI: 0.44 to 2.44); and microvascular complications, RR=0.83 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.17). For all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, there was significant heterogeneity when including the UK Prospective Diabetes Study subgroups (I(2)=41% and 59%). There was significant interaction with sulphonylurea as a concomitant treatment for myocardial infarction (p=0.10 and 0.02, respectively).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Although metformin is considered the gold standard, its benefit/risk ratio remains uncertain. We cannot exclude a 25% reduction or a 31% increase in all-cause mortality. We cannot exclude a 33% reduction or a 64% increase in cardiovascular mortality. Further studies are needed to clarify this situation.Rémy BoussageonIrène SupperTheodora Bejan-AngoulvantNadir KellouMichel CucheratJean-Pierre BoisselBehrouz KassaiAlain MoreauFrançois GueyffierCatherine CornuPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 9, Iss 4, p e1001204 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Rémy Boussageon
Irène Supper
Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant
Nadir Kellou
Michel Cucherat
Jean-Pierre Boissel
Behrouz Kassai
Alain Moreau
François Gueyffier
Catherine Cornu
Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
description <h4>Background</h4>The UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed that metformin decreases mortality compared to diet alone in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since then, it has been the first-line treatment in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. However, metformin-sulphonylurea bitherapy may increase mortality.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluated metformin efficacy (in studies of metformin versus diet alone, versus placebo, and versus no treatment; metformin as an add-on therapy; and metformin withdrawal) against cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database. Primary end points were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death. Secondary end points included all myocardial infarctions, all strokes, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, leg amputations, and microvascular complications. Thirteen randomised controlled trials (13,110 patients) were retrieved; 9,560 patients were given metformin, and 3,550 patients were given conventional treatment or placebo. Metformin did not significantly affect the primary outcomes all-cause mortality, risk ratio (RR)=0.99 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.31), and cardiovascular mortality, RR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.64). The secondary outcomes were also unaffected by metformin treatment: all myocardial infarctions, RR=0.90 (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.09); all strokes, RR=0.76 (95% CI: 0.51 to 1.14); heart failure, RR=1.03 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.59); peripheral vascular disease, RR=0.90 (95% CI: 0.46 to 1.78); leg amputations, RR=1.04 (95% CI: 0.44 to 2.44); and microvascular complications, RR=0.83 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.17). For all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, there was significant heterogeneity when including the UK Prospective Diabetes Study subgroups (I(2)=41% and 59%). There was significant interaction with sulphonylurea as a concomitant treatment for myocardial infarction (p=0.10 and 0.02, respectively).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Although metformin is considered the gold standard, its benefit/risk ratio remains uncertain. We cannot exclude a 25% reduction or a 31% increase in all-cause mortality. We cannot exclude a 33% reduction or a 64% increase in cardiovascular mortality. Further studies are needed to clarify this situation.
format article
author Rémy Boussageon
Irène Supper
Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant
Nadir Kellou
Michel Cucherat
Jean-Pierre Boissel
Behrouz Kassai
Alain Moreau
François Gueyffier
Catherine Cornu
author_facet Rémy Boussageon
Irène Supper
Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant
Nadir Kellou
Michel Cucherat
Jean-Pierre Boissel
Behrouz Kassai
Alain Moreau
François Gueyffier
Catherine Cornu
author_sort Rémy Boussageon
title Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
title_short Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
title_full Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
title_fullStr Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
title_sort reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/099e18ead147466e9febdcd0e87c4740
work_keys_str_mv AT remyboussageon reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT irenesupper reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT theodorabejanangoulvant reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT nadirkellou reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT michelcucherat reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT jeanpierreboissel reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT behrouzkassai reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT alainmoreau reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT francoisgueyffier reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT catherinecornu reappraisalofmetforminefficacyinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1718375822912389120