Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation

Background: The knowledge and ability to prescribe safely and effectively is a core competency for every graduating medical student. Our previous research suggested concerns about medical student prescribing abilities, and interest in a standardized assessment process.  Methods: A multi-year cross-s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anne Holbrook, J. Tiger Liu, Michael Rieder, Michelle Gibson, Mitchell Levine, Gary Foster, Dan Perri, Simon Maxwell
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a8667
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a8667
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a86672021-12-01T22:43:58ZPrescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation10.36834/cmej.616461923-1202https://doaj.org/article/0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a86672019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/61646https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202Background: The knowledge and ability to prescribe safely and effectively is a core competency for every graduating medical student. Our previous research suggested concerns about medical student prescribing abilities, and interest in a standardized assessment process.  Methods: A multi-year cross-sectional study evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and discriminative ability of an online prescribing competency assessment for final year Canadian medical students was conducted. Students at nine sites of four Ontario medical schools were invited to participate in an online one-hour exam of eight domains related to prescribing safely. Student feedback on perceived fairness, clarity, and ease of use formed the primary outcome. Exam performance and parity between schools were the secondary outcome.   Results: A total of 714 students completed the assessment during spring final review courses between 2016 and 2018. Student feedback was more favourable than not for appropriateness of content (53.5% agreement vs 18.3% disagreement), clarity of questions (65.5% agreement vs 11.6% disagreement), question layout and presentation (70.8% agreement vs 12.2% disagreement), and ease of use of online interface (67.1% agreement vs 13.6% disagreement). Few (23.6% believed their course work had prepared them for the assessment. Mean total exam score was 70.0% overall (SD 10.4%), with 47.6% scoring at or above the pass threshold of 70%.  Conclusion: Our prescribing competency assessment proved feasible, acceptable, and discriminative, and indicated a need for better medical school training to improve prescribing competency. Further evaluation in a larger sample of medical schools is warranted. Anne HolbrookJ. Tiger LiuMichael RiederMichelle GibsonMitchell LevineGary FosterDan PerriSimon MaxwellCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Anne Holbrook
J. Tiger Liu
Michael Rieder
Michelle Gibson
Mitchell Levine
Gary Foster
Dan Perri
Simon Maxwell
Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation
description Background: The knowledge and ability to prescribe safely and effectively is a core competency for every graduating medical student. Our previous research suggested concerns about medical student prescribing abilities, and interest in a standardized assessment process.  Methods: A multi-year cross-sectional study evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and discriminative ability of an online prescribing competency assessment for final year Canadian medical students was conducted. Students at nine sites of four Ontario medical schools were invited to participate in an online one-hour exam of eight domains related to prescribing safely. Student feedback on perceived fairness, clarity, and ease of use formed the primary outcome. Exam performance and parity between schools were the secondary outcome.   Results: A total of 714 students completed the assessment during spring final review courses between 2016 and 2018. Student feedback was more favourable than not for appropriateness of content (53.5% agreement vs 18.3% disagreement), clarity of questions (65.5% agreement vs 11.6% disagreement), question layout and presentation (70.8% agreement vs 12.2% disagreement), and ease of use of online interface (67.1% agreement vs 13.6% disagreement). Few (23.6% believed their course work had prepared them for the assessment. Mean total exam score was 70.0% overall (SD 10.4%), with 47.6% scoring at or above the pass threshold of 70%.  Conclusion: Our prescribing competency assessment proved feasible, acceptable, and discriminative, and indicated a need for better medical school training to improve prescribing competency. Further evaluation in a larger sample of medical schools is warranted.
format article
author Anne Holbrook
J. Tiger Liu
Michael Rieder
Michelle Gibson
Mitchell Levine
Gary Foster
Dan Perri
Simon Maxwell
author_facet Anne Holbrook
J. Tiger Liu
Michael Rieder
Michelle Gibson
Mitchell Levine
Gary Foster
Dan Perri
Simon Maxwell
author_sort Anne Holbrook
title Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation
title_short Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation
title_full Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation
title_fullStr Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation
title_sort prescribing competency assessment for canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a8667
work_keys_str_mv AT anneholbrook prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation
AT jtigerliu prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation
AT michaelrieder prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation
AT michellegibson prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation
AT mitchelllevine prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation
AT garyfoster prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation
AT danperri prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation
AT simonmaxwell prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation
_version_ 1718404024808505344