Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation
Background: The knowledge and ability to prescribe safely and effectively is a core competency for every graduating medical student. Our previous research suggested concerns about medical student prescribing abilities, and interest in a standardized assessment process. Methods: A multi-year cross-s...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Canadian Medical Education Journal
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a8667 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a8667 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a86672021-12-01T22:43:58ZPrescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation10.36834/cmej.616461923-1202https://doaj.org/article/0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a86672019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/61646https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202Background: The knowledge and ability to prescribe safely and effectively is a core competency for every graduating medical student. Our previous research suggested concerns about medical student prescribing abilities, and interest in a standardized assessment process. Methods: A multi-year cross-sectional study evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and discriminative ability of an online prescribing competency assessment for final year Canadian medical students was conducted. Students at nine sites of four Ontario medical schools were invited to participate in an online one-hour exam of eight domains related to prescribing safely. Student feedback on perceived fairness, clarity, and ease of use formed the primary outcome. Exam performance and parity between schools were the secondary outcome. Results: A total of 714 students completed the assessment during spring final review courses between 2016 and 2018. Student feedback was more favourable than not for appropriateness of content (53.5% agreement vs 18.3% disagreement), clarity of questions (65.5% agreement vs 11.6% disagreement), question layout and presentation (70.8% agreement vs 12.2% disagreement), and ease of use of online interface (67.1% agreement vs 13.6% disagreement). Few (23.6% believed their course work had prepared them for the assessment. Mean total exam score was 70.0% overall (SD 10.4%), with 47.6% scoring at or above the pass threshold of 70%. Conclusion: Our prescribing competency assessment proved feasible, acceptable, and discriminative, and indicated a need for better medical school training to improve prescribing competency. Further evaluation in a larger sample of medical schools is warranted. Anne HolbrookJ. Tiger LiuMichael RiederMichelle GibsonMitchell LevineGary FosterDan PerriSimon MaxwellCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2019) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Education (General) L7-991 Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
Education (General) L7-991 Medicine (General) R5-920 Anne Holbrook J. Tiger Liu Michael Rieder Michelle Gibson Mitchell Levine Gary Foster Dan Perri Simon Maxwell Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation |
description |
Background: The knowledge and ability to prescribe safely and effectively is a core competency for every graduating medical student. Our previous research suggested concerns about medical student prescribing abilities, and interest in a standardized assessment process.
Methods: A multi-year cross-sectional study evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and discriminative ability of an online prescribing competency assessment for final year Canadian medical students was conducted. Students at nine sites of four Ontario medical schools were invited to participate in an online one-hour exam of eight domains related to prescribing safely. Student feedback on perceived fairness, clarity, and ease of use formed the primary outcome. Exam performance and parity between schools were the secondary outcome.
Results: A total of 714 students completed the assessment during spring final review courses between 2016 and 2018. Student feedback was more favourable than not for appropriateness of content (53.5% agreement vs 18.3% disagreement), clarity of questions (65.5% agreement vs 11.6% disagreement), question layout and presentation (70.8% agreement vs 12.2% disagreement), and ease of use of online interface (67.1% agreement vs 13.6% disagreement). Few (23.6% believed their course work had prepared them for the assessment. Mean total exam score was 70.0% overall (SD 10.4%), with 47.6% scoring at or above the pass threshold of 70%.
Conclusion: Our prescribing competency assessment proved feasible, acceptable, and discriminative, and indicated a need for better medical school training to improve prescribing competency. Further evaluation in a larger sample of medical schools is warranted.
|
format |
article |
author |
Anne Holbrook J. Tiger Liu Michael Rieder Michelle Gibson Mitchell Levine Gary Foster Dan Perri Simon Maxwell |
author_facet |
Anne Holbrook J. Tiger Liu Michael Rieder Michelle Gibson Mitchell Levine Gary Foster Dan Perri Simon Maxwell |
author_sort |
Anne Holbrook |
title |
Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation |
title_short |
Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation |
title_full |
Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation |
title_sort |
prescribing competency assessment for canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation |
publisher |
Canadian Medical Education Journal |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0a7969e7794d4e2190579630901a8667 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anneholbrook prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation AT jtigerliu prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation AT michaelrieder prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation AT michellegibson prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation AT mitchelllevine prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation AT garyfoster prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation AT danperri prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation AT simonmaxwell prescribingcompetencyassessmentforcanadianmedicalstudentsapilotevaluation |
_version_ |
1718404024808505344 |