Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews
Abstract Background There are increasing expectations for researchers and knowledge users in the health system to use a research partnership approach, such as integrated knowledge translation, to increase the relevance and use of research findings in health practice, programmes and policies. However...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/14734c789e9046618823fdae4a945a9a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:14734c789e9046618823fdae4a945a9a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:14734c789e9046618823fdae4a945a9a2021-11-08T10:45:46ZTrainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews10.1186/s12961-021-00784-01478-4505https://doaj.org/article/14734c789e9046618823fdae4a945a9a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00784-0https://doaj.org/toc/1478-4505Abstract Background There are increasing expectations for researchers and knowledge users in the health system to use a research partnership approach, such as integrated knowledge translation, to increase the relevance and use of research findings in health practice, programmes and policies. However, little is known about how health research trainees engage in research partnership approaches such as IKT. In response, the purpose of this scoping review was to map and characterize the evidence related to using an IKT or other research partnership approach from the perspective of health research trainees in thesis and/or postdoctoral work. Methods We conducted this scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We searched the following databases in June 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We also searched sources of unpublished studies and grey literature. We reported our findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Results We included 74 records that described trainees’ experiences using an IKT or other research partnership approach to health research. The majority of studies involved collaboration with knowledge users in the research question development, recruitment and data collection stages of the research process. Intersecting barriers to IKT or other research partnerships at the individual, interpersonal and organizational levels were reported, including lack of skills in partnership research, competing priorities and trainees’ “outsider” status. We also identified studies that evaluated their IKT approach and reported impacts on partnership formation, such as valuing different perspectives, and enhanced relevance of research. Conclusion Our review provides insights for trainees interested in IKT or other research partnership approaches and offers guidance on how to apply an IKT approach to their research. The review findings can serve as a basis for future reviews and primary research focused on IKT principles, strategies and evaluation. The findings can also inform IKT training efforts such as guideline development and academic programme development.Christine E. CassidyHwayeon Danielle ShinEmily RamageAislinn ConwayKelly MrklasCelia LaurAmy BeckMelissa Demery VarinSandy SteinwenderTram NguyenJodi LangleyRachel DoreyLauren DonnellyIlja OrmelBMCarticleIntegrated knowledge translationHealth researchResearch traineesPartnership approachesCollaborative researchPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENHealth Research Policy and Systems, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-50 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Integrated knowledge translation Health research Research trainees Partnership approaches Collaborative research Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 |
spellingShingle |
Integrated knowledge translation Health research Research trainees Partnership approaches Collaborative research Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Christine E. Cassidy Hwayeon Danielle Shin Emily Ramage Aislinn Conway Kelly Mrklas Celia Laur Amy Beck Melissa Demery Varin Sandy Steinwender Tram Nguyen Jodi Langley Rachel Dorey Lauren Donnelly Ilja Ormel Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews |
description |
Abstract Background There are increasing expectations for researchers and knowledge users in the health system to use a research partnership approach, such as integrated knowledge translation, to increase the relevance and use of research findings in health practice, programmes and policies. However, little is known about how health research trainees engage in research partnership approaches such as IKT. In response, the purpose of this scoping review was to map and characterize the evidence related to using an IKT or other research partnership approach from the perspective of health research trainees in thesis and/or postdoctoral work. Methods We conducted this scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We searched the following databases in June 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We also searched sources of unpublished studies and grey literature. We reported our findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Results We included 74 records that described trainees’ experiences using an IKT or other research partnership approach to health research. The majority of studies involved collaboration with knowledge users in the research question development, recruitment and data collection stages of the research process. Intersecting barriers to IKT or other research partnerships at the individual, interpersonal and organizational levels were reported, including lack of skills in partnership research, competing priorities and trainees’ “outsider” status. We also identified studies that evaluated their IKT approach and reported impacts on partnership formation, such as valuing different perspectives, and enhanced relevance of research. Conclusion Our review provides insights for trainees interested in IKT or other research partnership approaches and offers guidance on how to apply an IKT approach to their research. The review findings can serve as a basis for future reviews and primary research focused on IKT principles, strategies and evaluation. The findings can also inform IKT training efforts such as guideline development and academic programme development. |
format |
article |
author |
Christine E. Cassidy Hwayeon Danielle Shin Emily Ramage Aislinn Conway Kelly Mrklas Celia Laur Amy Beck Melissa Demery Varin Sandy Steinwender Tram Nguyen Jodi Langley Rachel Dorey Lauren Donnelly Ilja Ormel |
author_facet |
Christine E. Cassidy Hwayeon Danielle Shin Emily Ramage Aislinn Conway Kelly Mrklas Celia Laur Amy Beck Melissa Demery Varin Sandy Steinwender Tram Nguyen Jodi Langley Rachel Dorey Lauren Donnelly Ilja Ormel |
author_sort |
Christine E. Cassidy |
title |
Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews |
title_short |
Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews |
title_full |
Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews |
title_fullStr |
Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews |
title_sort |
trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/14734c789e9046618823fdae4a945a9a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christineecassidy traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT hwayeondanielleshin traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT emilyramage traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT aislinnconway traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT kellymrklas traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT celialaur traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT amybeck traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT melissademeryvarin traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT sandysteinwender traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT tramnguyen traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT jodilangley traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT racheldorey traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT laurendonnelly traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews AT iljaormel traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews |
_version_ |
1718442588990603264 |