The validation of peer review through research impact measures and the implications for funding strategies.
There is a paucity of data in the literature concerning the validation of the grant application peer review process, which is used to help direct billions of dollars in research funds. Ultimately, this validation will hinge upon empirical data relating the output of funded projects to the prediction...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Stephen A Gallo, Afton S Carpenter, David Irwin, Caitlin D McPartland, Joseph Travis, Sofie Reynders, Lisa A Thompson, Scott R Glisson |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/193683a1e52e45c9ab5bc3d71216d006 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Peer review, program officers and science funding.
by: Paul J Roebber, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Care and feeding of the endocannabinoid system: a systematic review of potential clinical interventions that upregulate the endocannabinoid system.
by: John M McPartland, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Interpretation by the fund
by: Gold, Joseph
Published: (1968) -
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal.
by: Jeffrey L Jackson, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Living in seaside caravans: new survey evidence and the implications for local authority funding
by: Christina Beatty, et al.
Published: (2012)