Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.
The consolidation of scientific knowledge proceeds through the interpretation and then distillation of data presented in research reports, first in review articles and then in textbooks and undergraduate courses, until truths become accepted as such both amongst "experts" and in the public...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Emily S Sena, H Bart van der Worp, Philip M W Bath, David W Howells, Malcolm R Macleod |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/19af55a6f9af4bcba9e677d9b37bdee5 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?
by: H Bart van der Worp, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases.
by: Konstantinos K Tsilidis, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
by: Ana Antonic, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Using median survival in meta-analysis of experimental time-to-event data
by: Theodore C. Hirst, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Considering lead-time bias in evaluating the effectiveness of lung cancer screening with real-world data
by: Szu-Chun Yang, et al.
Published: (2021)