Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile in China. Methods: 12,098 participants aged from 0 to 36 months from 30 provinces (mostly from Shanghai) in China were enrolled between 2013 and 2020. The reliability was reflected by...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng Chen, Sikun Chen, Yilu Huang, Jinming Yu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/21469e6a91f14089bcd783e4c1bcb20f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:21469e6a91f14089bcd783e4c1bcb20f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:21469e6a91f14089bcd783e4c1bcb20f2021-11-25T17:14:05ZReliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)10.3390/children81109742227-9067https://doaj.org/article/21469e6a91f14089bcd783e4c1bcb20f2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/11/974https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067Objectives: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile in China. Methods: 12,098 participants aged from 0 to 36 months from 30 provinces (mostly from Shanghai) in China were enrolled between 2013 and 2020. The reliability was reflected by Pearson correlation coefficients, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and standard errors; the validity was shown by the coefficients between the dimensions, and we also evaluated the responsiveness as a supplement to the validity. Results: Reliability: in six domains among each subgroup, Pearson correlation coefficients between developmental age and chronological age ranged from 0.89 to 0.98, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients from 0.71 to 0.99, and standard errors from 0.15 to 2.76. Validity: after controlling for chronological age, the correlation coefficients between the dimensions were between 0.18 and 0.78, and most of them were below 0.70. Responsiveness: developmental age of all domains obtained via the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile system changed significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with time (gap of 1–3 months), and the standardized response mean ranged from 0.66 to 2.45. Conclusions: The Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile is suitable for assessing children’s development in Shanghai, but still needs confirmation when used in other provinces in China due to the great differences between regions in China.Deng ChenSikun ChenYilu HuangJinming YuMDPI AGarticlechild’s developmentearly childhoodreliabilityvalidityresponsivenessPediatricsRJ1-570ENChildren, Vol 8, Iss 974, p 974 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic child’s development
early childhood
reliability
validity
responsiveness
Pediatrics
RJ1-570
spellingShingle child’s development
early childhood
reliability
validity
responsiveness
Pediatrics
RJ1-570
Deng Chen
Sikun Chen
Yilu Huang
Jinming Yu
Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)
description Objectives: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile in China. Methods: 12,098 participants aged from 0 to 36 months from 30 provinces (mostly from Shanghai) in China were enrolled between 2013 and 2020. The reliability was reflected by Pearson correlation coefficients, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and standard errors; the validity was shown by the coefficients between the dimensions, and we also evaluated the responsiveness as a supplement to the validity. Results: Reliability: in six domains among each subgroup, Pearson correlation coefficients between developmental age and chronological age ranged from 0.89 to 0.98, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients from 0.71 to 0.99, and standard errors from 0.15 to 2.76. Validity: after controlling for chronological age, the correlation coefficients between the dimensions were between 0.18 and 0.78, and most of them were below 0.70. Responsiveness: developmental age of all domains obtained via the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile system changed significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with time (gap of 1–3 months), and the standardized response mean ranged from 0.66 to 2.45. Conclusions: The Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile is suitable for assessing children’s development in Shanghai, but still needs confirmation when used in other provinces in China due to the great differences between regions in China.
format article
author Deng Chen
Sikun Chen
Yilu Huang
Jinming Yu
author_facet Deng Chen
Sikun Chen
Yilu Huang
Jinming Yu
author_sort Deng Chen
title Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)
title_short Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)
title_full Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)
title_fullStr Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)
title_full_unstemmed Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)
title_sort reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the chinese learning accomplishment profile (c-lap)
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/21469e6a91f14089bcd783e4c1bcb20f
work_keys_str_mv AT dengchen reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthechineselearningaccomplishmentprofileclap
AT sikunchen reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthechineselearningaccomplishmentprofileclap
AT yiluhuang reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthechineselearningaccomplishmentprofileclap
AT jinmingyu reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthechineselearningaccomplishmentprofileclap
_version_ 1718412576563396608