A genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?

Abstract Background With advances in sequencing technologies, increasing numbers of people are being informed about a genetic disease identified in their family. In current practice, probands (the first person in a family in whom a genetic predisposition is identified) are asked to inform at-risk re...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lieke M. van den Heuvel, Els L. M. Maeckelberghe, M. Corrette Ploem, Imke Christiaans
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2204856fd7a4465db72fe6e4d2bdf288
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2204856fd7a4465db72fe6e4d2bdf288
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2204856fd7a4465db72fe6e4d2bdf2882021-11-28T12:03:31ZA genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?10.1186/s12910-021-00721-41472-6939https://doaj.org/article/2204856fd7a4465db72fe6e4d2bdf2882021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00721-4https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6939Abstract Background With advances in sequencing technologies, increasing numbers of people are being informed about a genetic disease identified in their family. In current practice, probands (the first person in a family in whom a genetic predisposition is identified) are asked to inform at-risk relatives about the diagnosis. However, previous research has shown that relatives are sometimes not informed due to barriers such as family conflicts. Research on family communication in genetic diseases aims to explore the difficulties encountered in informing relatives and to identify ways to support probands in this. Main body Research on family communication may also reveal that participants did not inform their relatives about the risk of a serious genetic condition, even when preventive and treatment options are available. Researchers may then face a dilemma: Do they need to warn at-risk relatives about the finding? Or do they keep silent due to prior confidentiality agreements with study participants? Conclusions We believe that the absolute confidence promised to research participants outweighs the interests of their relatives, even though it can be claimed that relatives at risk of a genetic disease do, in principle, have a right to know information collected about their health. Not respecting confidentiality agreements could cause distrust between researchers and research participants and possibly harm the relationship between probands and relatives. Relatives' health interests can still be taken into account without jeopardizing participant trust, by considering alternative scenarios, including sharing general study findings on the barriers participants experience with their healthcare professionals and by offering participants psychosocial support for family communication.Lieke M. van den HeuvelEls L. M. MaeckelbergheM. Corrette PloemImke ChristiaansBMCarticleFamily communication researchGenetic riskDuty to warnInforming at-risk relativesMedical philosophy. Medical ethicsR723-726ENBMC Medical Ethics, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Family communication research
Genetic risk
Duty to warn
Informing at-risk relatives
Medical philosophy. Medical ethics
R723-726
spellingShingle Family communication research
Genetic risk
Duty to warn
Informing at-risk relatives
Medical philosophy. Medical ethics
R723-726
Lieke M. van den Heuvel
Els L. M. Maeckelberghe
M. Corrette Ploem
Imke Christiaans
A genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?
description Abstract Background With advances in sequencing technologies, increasing numbers of people are being informed about a genetic disease identified in their family. In current practice, probands (the first person in a family in whom a genetic predisposition is identified) are asked to inform at-risk relatives about the diagnosis. However, previous research has shown that relatives are sometimes not informed due to barriers such as family conflicts. Research on family communication in genetic diseases aims to explore the difficulties encountered in informing relatives and to identify ways to support probands in this. Main body Research on family communication may also reveal that participants did not inform their relatives about the risk of a serious genetic condition, even when preventive and treatment options are available. Researchers may then face a dilemma: Do they need to warn at-risk relatives about the finding? Or do they keep silent due to prior confidentiality agreements with study participants? Conclusions We believe that the absolute confidence promised to research participants outweighs the interests of their relatives, even though it can be claimed that relatives at risk of a genetic disease do, in principle, have a right to know information collected about their health. Not respecting confidentiality agreements could cause distrust between researchers and research participants and possibly harm the relationship between probands and relatives. Relatives' health interests can still be taken into account without jeopardizing participant trust, by considering alternative scenarios, including sharing general study findings on the barriers participants experience with their healthcare professionals and by offering participants psychosocial support for family communication.
format article
author Lieke M. van den Heuvel
Els L. M. Maeckelberghe
M. Corrette Ploem
Imke Christiaans
author_facet Lieke M. van den Heuvel
Els L. M. Maeckelberghe
M. Corrette Ploem
Imke Christiaans
author_sort Lieke M. van den Heuvel
title A genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?
title_short A genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?
title_full A genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?
title_fullStr A genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?
title_full_unstemmed A genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?
title_sort genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2204856fd7a4465db72fe6e4d2bdf288
work_keys_str_mv AT liekemvandenheuvel ageneticresearchersdevilsdilemmawarnrelativesabouttheirgeneticriskorrespectconfidentialityagreementswithresearchparticipants
AT elslmmaeckelberghe ageneticresearchersdevilsdilemmawarnrelativesabouttheirgeneticriskorrespectconfidentialityagreementswithresearchparticipants
AT mcorretteploem ageneticresearchersdevilsdilemmawarnrelativesabouttheirgeneticriskorrespectconfidentialityagreementswithresearchparticipants
AT imkechristiaans ageneticresearchersdevilsdilemmawarnrelativesabouttheirgeneticriskorrespectconfidentialityagreementswithresearchparticipants
AT liekemvandenheuvel geneticresearchersdevilsdilemmawarnrelativesabouttheirgeneticriskorrespectconfidentialityagreementswithresearchparticipants
AT elslmmaeckelberghe geneticresearchersdevilsdilemmawarnrelativesabouttheirgeneticriskorrespectconfidentialityagreementswithresearchparticipants
AT mcorretteploem geneticresearchersdevilsdilemmawarnrelativesabouttheirgeneticriskorrespectconfidentialityagreementswithresearchparticipants
AT imkechristiaans geneticresearchersdevilsdilemmawarnrelativesabouttheirgeneticriskorrespectconfidentialityagreementswithresearchparticipants
_version_ 1718408186911784960