Applying the ‘Social Turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy

The aim of this paper is to explore the fit between the cognitive concept of writing self-efficacy and a socially constructed epistemology of writing. Socially constructed perspectives on writing emphasise context and community and include academic literacies, rhetorical genre theory, and the writin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim M. Mitchell, Diana E. McMillan, Michelle M. Lobchuk
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/23368006399f44639c989854a536e820
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:23368006399f44639c989854a536e820
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:23368006399f44639c989854a536e8202021-11-29T14:02:36ZApplying the ‘Social Turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.5121759-667Xhttps://doaj.org/article/23368006399f44639c989854a536e8202019-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/512https://doaj.org/toc/1759-667XThe aim of this paper is to explore the fit between the cognitive concept of writing self-efficacy and a socially constructed epistemology of writing. Socially constructed perspectives on writing emphasise context and community and include academic literacies, rhetorical genre theory, and the writing across the curriculum movement. These perspectives have been prominent in theoretical discussions of writing since the 1980s. This paper argues that the measurement of writing self-efficacy has continued to prioritise assessing writing self-efficacy as ability to successfully accomplish superficial writing product and process features, while the social context of writing and its resultant impacts on the identity forming, relational, emotional and creative impacts on writing self-efficacy have been largely ignored. The historical context of paradigmatic shifts in writing theory will be discussed with a lens towards proposing a synthesis of three constructionist situated perspectives - activity theory, rhetorical genre theory, and communities of practice - and how these situated perspectives may inform a more complete view of how writing self-efficacy should be assessed and measured. How practitioners may consider the merger of these theories in writing pedagogy will be introduced to inspire future research.Kim M. MitchellDiana E. McMillanMichelle M. LobchukAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)articleWriting self-efficacysocial cognitive theorysocially constructed epistemologyacademic literaciesactivity theoryrhetorical genre theoryTheory and practice of educationLB5-3640ENJournal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Iss 15 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Writing self-efficacy
social cognitive theory
socially constructed epistemology
academic literacies
activity theory
rhetorical genre theory
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
spellingShingle Writing self-efficacy
social cognitive theory
socially constructed epistemology
academic literacies
activity theory
rhetorical genre theory
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
Kim M. Mitchell
Diana E. McMillan
Michelle M. Lobchuk
Applying the ‘Social Turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy
description The aim of this paper is to explore the fit between the cognitive concept of writing self-efficacy and a socially constructed epistemology of writing. Socially constructed perspectives on writing emphasise context and community and include academic literacies, rhetorical genre theory, and the writing across the curriculum movement. These perspectives have been prominent in theoretical discussions of writing since the 1980s. This paper argues that the measurement of writing self-efficacy has continued to prioritise assessing writing self-efficacy as ability to successfully accomplish superficial writing product and process features, while the social context of writing and its resultant impacts on the identity forming, relational, emotional and creative impacts on writing self-efficacy have been largely ignored. The historical context of paradigmatic shifts in writing theory will be discussed with a lens towards proposing a synthesis of three constructionist situated perspectives - activity theory, rhetorical genre theory, and communities of practice - and how these situated perspectives may inform a more complete view of how writing self-efficacy should be assessed and measured. How practitioners may consider the merger of these theories in writing pedagogy will be introduced to inspire future research.
format article
author Kim M. Mitchell
Diana E. McMillan
Michelle M. Lobchuk
author_facet Kim M. Mitchell
Diana E. McMillan
Michelle M. Lobchuk
author_sort Kim M. Mitchell
title Applying the ‘Social Turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy
title_short Applying the ‘Social Turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy
title_full Applying the ‘Social Turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy
title_fullStr Applying the ‘Social Turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Applying the ‘Social Turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy
title_sort applying the ‘social turn’ in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy
publisher Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/23368006399f44639c989854a536e820
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmmitchell applyingthesocialturninwritingscholarshiptoperspectivesonwritingselfefficacy
AT dianaemcmillan applyingthesocialturninwritingscholarshiptoperspectivesonwritingselfefficacy
AT michellemlobchuk applyingthesocialturninwritingscholarshiptoperspectivesonwritingselfefficacy
_version_ 1718407272070119424