Comparison of the Chemical and Sensorial Evaluation of Dark Chocolate Bars

As it mimics olfactory perception, headspace analysis is frequently used for examination of products like chocolate, in which aroma is a key feature. Chemical analysis by itself, however, only provides half the picture, as final consumer’s perception cannot be compared to that of a Gas Chromatograph...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ylenia Pieracci, Roberta Ascrizzi, Luisa Pistelli, Guido Flamini
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/24f3d83ca95f45bcb1956864c94a7ded
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:24f3d83ca95f45bcb1956864c94a7ded
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:24f3d83ca95f45bcb1956864c94a7ded2021-11-11T15:03:44ZComparison of the Chemical and Sensorial Evaluation of Dark Chocolate Bars10.3390/app112199642076-3417https://doaj.org/article/24f3d83ca95f45bcb1956864c94a7ded2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/9964https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417As it mimics olfactory perception, headspace analysis is frequently used for examination of products like chocolate, in which aroma is a key feature. Chemical analysis by itself, however, only provides half the picture, as final consumer’s perception cannot be compared to that of a Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) port, but rather to a panel test assessment. The aim of the present study was the evaluation of combined chemical (by means of headspace solid-phase microextraction and GC-MS) and panel test data (by means of a sensory evaluation operated by 6 untrained panelists) obtained for 24 dark chocolate bars to assess whether these can discriminate between bars from different brands belonging to different commercial segments (hard discount, HD; supermarket, SM; organic bars, BIO). In all samples, with the only exception of one supermarket bar (in which esters exhibited the highest relative abundance), pyrazines were detected as the most abundant chemical class (HD: 56.3–74.2%; BIO: 52.0–76.4%; SM: 31.2–88.9%). Non-terpene alcohols, aldehydes, and esters followed as quantitatively relevant groups of compounds. The obtained data was then subjected to hierarchical cluster (HCA) and principal component (PCA) analysis. The statistical distribution of samples obtained for the chemical data did not match that obtained with panelists’ sensorial data. Moreover, although an overall ability of grouping samples of the same commercial origin was evidenced for hard discount and supermarket bars, no sharp grouping was possible.Ylenia PieracciRoberta AscrizziLuisa PistelliGuido FlaminiMDPI AGarticle<i>Theobroma cacao</i> L.cocoapanel testheadspacevolatile organic compoundspyrazinesTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 9964, p 9964 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic <i>Theobroma cacao</i> L.
cocoa
panel test
headspace
volatile organic compounds
pyrazines
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle <i>Theobroma cacao</i> L.
cocoa
panel test
headspace
volatile organic compounds
pyrazines
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
Ylenia Pieracci
Roberta Ascrizzi
Luisa Pistelli
Guido Flamini
Comparison of the Chemical and Sensorial Evaluation of Dark Chocolate Bars
description As it mimics olfactory perception, headspace analysis is frequently used for examination of products like chocolate, in which aroma is a key feature. Chemical analysis by itself, however, only provides half the picture, as final consumer’s perception cannot be compared to that of a Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) port, but rather to a panel test assessment. The aim of the present study was the evaluation of combined chemical (by means of headspace solid-phase microextraction and GC-MS) and panel test data (by means of a sensory evaluation operated by 6 untrained panelists) obtained for 24 dark chocolate bars to assess whether these can discriminate between bars from different brands belonging to different commercial segments (hard discount, HD; supermarket, SM; organic bars, BIO). In all samples, with the only exception of one supermarket bar (in which esters exhibited the highest relative abundance), pyrazines were detected as the most abundant chemical class (HD: 56.3–74.2%; BIO: 52.0–76.4%; SM: 31.2–88.9%). Non-terpene alcohols, aldehydes, and esters followed as quantitatively relevant groups of compounds. The obtained data was then subjected to hierarchical cluster (HCA) and principal component (PCA) analysis. The statistical distribution of samples obtained for the chemical data did not match that obtained with panelists’ sensorial data. Moreover, although an overall ability of grouping samples of the same commercial origin was evidenced for hard discount and supermarket bars, no sharp grouping was possible.
format article
author Ylenia Pieracci
Roberta Ascrizzi
Luisa Pistelli
Guido Flamini
author_facet Ylenia Pieracci
Roberta Ascrizzi
Luisa Pistelli
Guido Flamini
author_sort Ylenia Pieracci
title Comparison of the Chemical and Sensorial Evaluation of Dark Chocolate Bars
title_short Comparison of the Chemical and Sensorial Evaluation of Dark Chocolate Bars
title_full Comparison of the Chemical and Sensorial Evaluation of Dark Chocolate Bars
title_fullStr Comparison of the Chemical and Sensorial Evaluation of Dark Chocolate Bars
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Chemical and Sensorial Evaluation of Dark Chocolate Bars
title_sort comparison of the chemical and sensorial evaluation of dark chocolate bars
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/24f3d83ca95f45bcb1956864c94a7ded
work_keys_str_mv AT yleniapieracci comparisonofthechemicalandsensorialevaluationofdarkchocolatebars
AT robertaascrizzi comparisonofthechemicalandsensorialevaluationofdarkchocolatebars
AT luisapistelli comparisonofthechemicalandsensorialevaluationofdarkchocolatebars
AT guidoflamini comparisonofthechemicalandsensorialevaluationofdarkchocolatebars
_version_ 1718437111234822144