Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics

Investigations related to expertise in problem solving and ability to transfer learning from one context to another are important for developing strategies to help students perform more expertlike tasks. Here we analyze written responses to a pair of nonintuitive isomorphic problems given to introdu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chandralekha Singh
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2956684b507a40698cd92edd0deac2b5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2956684b507a40698cd92edd0deac2b5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2956684b507a40698cd92edd0deac2b52021-12-02T11:51:49ZAssessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.0101041554-9178https://doaj.org/article/2956684b507a40698cd92edd0deac2b52008-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010104http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010104https://doaj.org/toc/1554-9178Investigations related to expertise in problem solving and ability to transfer learning from one context to another are important for developing strategies to help students perform more expertlike tasks. Here we analyze written responses to a pair of nonintuitive isomorphic problems given to introductory physics students and discussions with a subset of students about them. Students were asked to explain their reasoning for their written responses. We call the paired problems isomorphic because they require the same physics principle to solve them. However, the initial conditions are different, and the frictional force is responsible for increasing the linear speed of an object in one of the problems while it is responsible for decreasing the linear speed in the other problem. We categorize student responses and evaluate student performance within the context of their evolving expertise. We compare and contrast the patterns of student categorization for the two isomorphic problems. We discuss why certain incorrect responses were better than others and shed light on the evolution of students’ expertise. We compare the performance of students who worked on both isomorphic problems with those who worked only on one of the problems to understand whether students recognized their underlying similarity and whether isomorphic pairs gave students additional insight into solving each problem.Chandralekha SinghAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, Vol 4, Iss 1, p 010104 (2008)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Chandralekha Singh
Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics
description Investigations related to expertise in problem solving and ability to transfer learning from one context to another are important for developing strategies to help students perform more expertlike tasks. Here we analyze written responses to a pair of nonintuitive isomorphic problems given to introductory physics students and discussions with a subset of students about them. Students were asked to explain their reasoning for their written responses. We call the paired problems isomorphic because they require the same physics principle to solve them. However, the initial conditions are different, and the frictional force is responsible for increasing the linear speed of an object in one of the problems while it is responsible for decreasing the linear speed in the other problem. We categorize student responses and evaluate student performance within the context of their evolving expertise. We compare and contrast the patterns of student categorization for the two isomorphic problems. We discuss why certain incorrect responses were better than others and shed light on the evolution of students’ expertise. We compare the performance of students who worked on both isomorphic problems with those who worked only on one of the problems to understand whether students recognized their underlying similarity and whether isomorphic pairs gave students additional insight into solving each problem.
format article
author Chandralekha Singh
author_facet Chandralekha Singh
author_sort Chandralekha Singh
title Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics
title_short Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics
title_full Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics
title_fullStr Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics
title_full_unstemmed Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics
title_sort assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. i. performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2008
url https://doaj.org/article/2956684b507a40698cd92edd0deac2b5
work_keys_str_mv AT chandralekhasingh assessingstudentexpertiseinintroductoryphysicswithisomorphicproblemsiperformanceonnonintuitiveproblempairfromintroductoryphysics
_version_ 1718395092897628160