Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM

This bilateral comparison in HRC is conducted in order to confirm the accuracy claimed by National Institute of Metrological Research in Italy (INRiM) and Central Office of Measures in Poland (GUM). Also, this study compares the difference of measurement results between two modernized deadweight-typ...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: J.D. Fidelus, A. Germak, C. Origlia
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Elsevier 2021
Sujets:
HRC
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/2bb2799e35d74b38bc48a3b35cf31e0b
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:This bilateral comparison in HRC is conducted in order to confirm the accuracy claimed by National Institute of Metrological Research in Italy (INRiM) and Central Office of Measures in Poland (GUM). Also, this study compares the difference of measurement results between two modernized deadweight-type Rockwell's hardness standard machines (HSMs) from GUM and primary hardness standard machine (PHSM) from INRiM. The hardness blocks of about 20 HRC, 35 HRC, 45 HRC, 50 HRC, 60 HRC and 65 HRC, which all have uniformity less then ±0.4 HRC according to EN ISO 6508-3, were used in this comparison.