Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
Publishers’ policies have the capability to increase transparency in scholarly literature. Malički and colleagues carried out a systematic review of over 150 studies that have examined scholarly journals’ recommendations. They find that requirements in terms of authorship, conflict of interests, dat...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Lex Bouter, Gerben ter Riet |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/2c7712cc780845e1a721a035736e1eba |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
by: Yali Liu, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review of meta-analyses
by: Bortolato B, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Investigation on factors associated with ovarian cancer: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analyses
by: Kiarash Tanha, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Comprehensive research synopsis and systematic meta-analyses in Parkinson's disease genetics: The PDGene database.
by: Christina M Lill, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
by: Dominik Irnich, et al.
Published: (2021)