Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
Publishers’ policies have the capability to increase transparency in scholarly literature. Malički and colleagues carried out a systematic review of over 150 studies that have examined scholarly journals’ recommendations. They find that requirements in terms of authorship, conflict of interests, dat...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Lex Bouter, Gerben ter Riet |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/2c7712cc780845e1a721a035736e1eba |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
par: Yali Liu, et autres
Publié: (2011) -
Cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review of meta-analyses
par: Bortolato B, et autres
Publié: (2015) -
Investigation on factors associated with ovarian cancer: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analyses
par: Kiarash Tanha, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Comprehensive research synopsis and systematic meta-analyses in Parkinson's disease genetics: The PDGene database.
par: Christina M Lill, et autres
Publié: (2012) -
Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
par: Dominik Irnich, et autres
Publié: (2021)