Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study

Sustainable consumption has the potential to hold firms accountable for the negative externalities they impose on society and the environment, but consumers are often unsure whether to believe that the products and companies promoted as being sustainable are truly sustainable. This research investig...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephanie Watts, Laurie Giddens
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/357e5c98da454dcdab35598d5b95fdda
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:357e5c98da454dcdab35598d5b95fdda
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:357e5c98da454dcdab35598d5b95fdda2021-12-02T14:35:47ZCredibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study2331-197510.1080/23311975.2017.1356608https://doaj.org/article/357e5c98da454dcdab35598d5b95fdda2017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1356608https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1975Sustainable consumption has the potential to hold firms accountable for the negative externalities they impose on society and the environment, but consumers are often unsure whether to believe that the products and companies promoted as being sustainable are truly sustainable. This research investigates novices’ credibility assessments of online sustainability ratings reports using a laboratory experiment and a dual-process theoretical lens. It identifies and operationalizes two new heuristic cues that theory suggests should be influential in this process: the For-profit status of the company that produced the expert reports, and its Strategic Ties. Each participant looked up companies’ sustainability ratings on two databases, one of which was perceived to be significantly easier to use and more credible than the other. Database Credibility and the For-profit status of the company producing the database both significantly affected perceptions of content usefulness. The impact of the Strategic Ties heuristic was inconclusive and merits further research. We are beginning to accumulate significant research on the effects of explicit labels and standards on consumer behavior. This research points to the need to understand the effects of available implicit heuristics as well, and offers many potential avenues for future research.Stephanie WattsLaurie GiddensTaylor & Francis Grouparticleconsumer ethicsbusiness ethicscredentialsrelease of informationBusinessHF5001-6182Management. Industrial managementHD28-70ENCogent Business & Management, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic consumer ethics
business ethics
credentials
release of information
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
spellingShingle consumer ethics
business ethics
credentials
release of information
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Stephanie Watts
Laurie Giddens
Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study
description Sustainable consumption has the potential to hold firms accountable for the negative externalities they impose on society and the environment, but consumers are often unsure whether to believe that the products and companies promoted as being sustainable are truly sustainable. This research investigates novices’ credibility assessments of online sustainability ratings reports using a laboratory experiment and a dual-process theoretical lens. It identifies and operationalizes two new heuristic cues that theory suggests should be influential in this process: the For-profit status of the company that produced the expert reports, and its Strategic Ties. Each participant looked up companies’ sustainability ratings on two databases, one of which was perceived to be significantly easier to use and more credible than the other. Database Credibility and the For-profit status of the company producing the database both significantly affected perceptions of content usefulness. The impact of the Strategic Ties heuristic was inconclusive and merits further research. We are beginning to accumulate significant research on the effects of explicit labels and standards on consumer behavior. This research points to the need to understand the effects of available implicit heuristics as well, and offers many potential avenues for future research.
format article
author Stephanie Watts
Laurie Giddens
author_facet Stephanie Watts
Laurie Giddens
author_sort Stephanie Watts
title Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study
title_short Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study
title_full Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study
title_fullStr Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study
title_full_unstemmed Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study
title_sort credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: a laboratory study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/357e5c98da454dcdab35598d5b95fdda
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniewatts credibilityassessmentforsustainableconsumptionalaboratorystudy
AT lauriegiddens credibilityassessmentforsustainableconsumptionalaboratorystudy
_version_ 1718391063987617792