Impact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females

It has been suggested that sex differences exist in recovery following strength training. This study aimed to investigate the differences in recovery kinetics between resistance trained males and females following two different back squat (BSq) protocols. The first protocol (eight females and eight...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Christian Houmann Amdi, Daniel John Cleather, Jamie Tallent
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	sex differences velocity squat fatigue fatigability 1RM Sports GV557-1198.995
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/36d74b1a1b4f4b1eb5044c3d08d3f1ae
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:36d74b1a1b4f4b1eb5044c3d08d3f1ae
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:36d74b1a1b4f4b1eb5044c3d08d3f1ae2021-11-25T19:00:09ZImpact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females10.3390/sports91101572075-4663https://doaj.org/article/36d74b1a1b4f4b1eb5044c3d08d3f1ae2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/9/11/157https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4663It has been suggested that sex differences exist in recovery following strength training. This study aimed to investigate the differences in recovery kinetics between resistance trained males and females following two different back squat (BSq) protocols. The first protocol (eight females and eight males) consisted of five sets of five repetitions at 80% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the BSq (SMRT), while the second (seven females and eight males) consisted of five sets to muscular failure (MF) with a 4–6RM load (RMRT). The recovery was quantified with the mean concentric velocity (MV) at 80% of the 1RM immediately before and 5 min, 24, 48, and 72 h after the training protocol. Following the SMRT, a significant between-sex difference, favoring the females, was observed at 5 min, 24 h, and 48 h following the SMRT (<i>p</i> < 0.05, Effect Size (ES) = 1.01–2.25). Following the RMRT, only the males experienced a significant drop in performance after 5 min compared to the baseline (<i>p</i> = 0.025, ES = 1.34). However, no sex differences were observed at any timepoint (<i>p</i> > 0.05). These results suggest that males experienced more fatigue than females following a protocol where the volume relative to the 1RM was matched, while no differences in fatigue were evident following a protocol in which multiple sets were performed to MF.Christian Houmann AmdiDaniel John CleatherJamie TallentMDPI AGarticlesex differencesvelocitysquatfatiguefatigability1RMSportsGV557-1198.995ENSports, Vol 9, Iss 157, p 157 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	sex differences velocity squat fatigue fatigability 1RM Sports GV557-1198.995
spellingShingle	sex differences velocity squat fatigue fatigability 1RM Sports GV557-1198.995 Christian Houmann Amdi Daniel John Cleather Jamie Tallent Impact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females
description	It has been suggested that sex differences exist in recovery following strength training. This study aimed to investigate the differences in recovery kinetics between resistance trained males and females following two different back squat (BSq) protocols. The first protocol (eight females and eight males) consisted of five sets of five repetitions at 80% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the BSq (SMRT), while the second (seven females and eight males) consisted of five sets to muscular failure (MF) with a 4–6RM load (RMRT). The recovery was quantified with the mean concentric velocity (MV) at 80% of the 1RM immediately before and 5 min, 24, 48, and 72 h after the training protocol. Following the SMRT, a significant between-sex difference, favoring the females, was observed at 5 min, 24 h, and 48 h following the SMRT (<i>p</i> < 0.05, Effect Size (ES) = 1.01–2.25). Following the RMRT, only the males experienced a significant drop in performance after 5 min compared to the baseline (<i>p</i> = 0.025, ES = 1.34). However, no sex differences were observed at any timepoint (<i>p</i> > 0.05). These results suggest that males experienced more fatigue than females following a protocol where the volume relative to the 1RM was matched, while no differences in fatigue were evident following a protocol in which multiple sets were performed to MF.
format	article
author	Christian Houmann Amdi Daniel John Cleather Jamie Tallent
author_facet	Christian Houmann Amdi Daniel John Cleather Jamie Tallent
author_sort	Christian Houmann Amdi
title	Impact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females
title_short	Impact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females
title_full	Impact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females
title_fullStr	Impact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females
title_full_unstemmed	Impact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females
title_sort	impact of training protocols on lifting velocity recovery in resistance trained males and females
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/36d74b1a1b4f4b1eb5044c3d08d3f1ae
work_keys_str_mv	AT christianhoumannamdi impactoftrainingprotocolsonliftingvelocityrecoveryinresistancetrainedmalesandfemales AT danieljohncleather impactoftrainingprotocolsonliftingvelocityrecoveryinresistancetrainedmalesandfemales AT jamietallent impactoftrainingprotocolsonliftingvelocityrecoveryinresistancetrainedmalesandfemales
_version_	1718410394155876352

Impact of Training Protocols on Lifting Velocity Recovery in Resistance Trained Males and Females

Ejemplares similares