Molecular Rationale behind the Differential Substrate Specificity of Bacterial RND Multi-Drug Transporters

Abstract Resistance-Nodulation-cell Division (RND) transporters AcrB and AcrD of Escherichia coli expel a wide range of substrates out of the cell in conjunction with AcrA and TolC, contributing to the onset of bacterial multidrug resistance. Despite sharing an overall sequence identity of ~66% (sim...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venkata Krishnan Ramaswamy, Attilio V. Vargiu, Giuliano Malloci, Jürg Dreier, Paolo Ruggerone
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/392930ee1eca422298bd285496cace51
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:392930ee1eca422298bd285496cace51
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:392930ee1eca422298bd285496cace512021-12-02T15:05:00ZMolecular Rationale behind the Differential Substrate Specificity of Bacterial RND Multi-Drug Transporters10.1038/s41598-017-08747-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/392930ee1eca422298bd285496cace512017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08747-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Resistance-Nodulation-cell Division (RND) transporters AcrB and AcrD of Escherichia coli expel a wide range of substrates out of the cell in conjunction with AcrA and TolC, contributing to the onset of bacterial multidrug resistance. Despite sharing an overall sequence identity of ~66% (similarity ~80%), these RND transporters feature distinct substrate specificity patterns whose underlying basis remains elusive. We performed exhaustive comparative analyses of the putative substrate binding pockets considering crystal structures, homology models and conformations extracted from multi-copy μs-long molecular dynamics simulations of both AcrB and AcrD. The impact of physicochemical and topographical properties (volume, shape, lipophilicity, electrostatic potential, hydration and distribution of multi-functional sites) within the pockets on their substrate specificities was quantitatively assessed. Differences in the lipophilic and electrostatic potentials among the pockets were identified. In particular, the deep pocket of AcrB showed the largest lipophilicity convincingly pointing out its possible role as a lipophilicity-based selectivity filter. Furthermore, we identified dynamic features (not inferable from sequence analysis or static structures) such as different flexibilities of specific protein loops that could potentially influence the substrate recognition and transport profile. Our findings can be valuable for drawing structure (dynamics)-activity relationship to be employed in drug design.Venkata Krishnan RamaswamyAttilio V. VargiuGiuliano MallociJürg DreierPaolo RuggeroneNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Venkata Krishnan Ramaswamy
Attilio V. Vargiu
Giuliano Malloci
Jürg Dreier
Paolo Ruggerone
Molecular Rationale behind the Differential Substrate Specificity of Bacterial RND Multi-Drug Transporters
description Abstract Resistance-Nodulation-cell Division (RND) transporters AcrB and AcrD of Escherichia coli expel a wide range of substrates out of the cell in conjunction with AcrA and TolC, contributing to the onset of bacterial multidrug resistance. Despite sharing an overall sequence identity of ~66% (similarity ~80%), these RND transporters feature distinct substrate specificity patterns whose underlying basis remains elusive. We performed exhaustive comparative analyses of the putative substrate binding pockets considering crystal structures, homology models and conformations extracted from multi-copy μs-long molecular dynamics simulations of both AcrB and AcrD. The impact of physicochemical and topographical properties (volume, shape, lipophilicity, electrostatic potential, hydration and distribution of multi-functional sites) within the pockets on their substrate specificities was quantitatively assessed. Differences in the lipophilic and electrostatic potentials among the pockets were identified. In particular, the deep pocket of AcrB showed the largest lipophilicity convincingly pointing out its possible role as a lipophilicity-based selectivity filter. Furthermore, we identified dynamic features (not inferable from sequence analysis or static structures) such as different flexibilities of specific protein loops that could potentially influence the substrate recognition and transport profile. Our findings can be valuable for drawing structure (dynamics)-activity relationship to be employed in drug design.
format article
author Venkata Krishnan Ramaswamy
Attilio V. Vargiu
Giuliano Malloci
Jürg Dreier
Paolo Ruggerone
author_facet Venkata Krishnan Ramaswamy
Attilio V. Vargiu
Giuliano Malloci
Jürg Dreier
Paolo Ruggerone
author_sort Venkata Krishnan Ramaswamy
title Molecular Rationale behind the Differential Substrate Specificity of Bacterial RND Multi-Drug Transporters
title_short Molecular Rationale behind the Differential Substrate Specificity of Bacterial RND Multi-Drug Transporters
title_full Molecular Rationale behind the Differential Substrate Specificity of Bacterial RND Multi-Drug Transporters
title_fullStr Molecular Rationale behind the Differential Substrate Specificity of Bacterial RND Multi-Drug Transporters
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Rationale behind the Differential Substrate Specificity of Bacterial RND Multi-Drug Transporters
title_sort molecular rationale behind the differential substrate specificity of bacterial rnd multi-drug transporters
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/392930ee1eca422298bd285496cace51
work_keys_str_mv AT venkatakrishnanramaswamy molecularrationalebehindthedifferentialsubstratespecificityofbacterialrndmultidrugtransporters
AT attiliovvargiu molecularrationalebehindthedifferentialsubstratespecificityofbacterialrndmultidrugtransporters
AT giulianomalloci molecularrationalebehindthedifferentialsubstratespecificityofbacterialrndmultidrugtransporters
AT jurgdreier molecularrationalebehindthedifferentialsubstratespecificityofbacterialrndmultidrugtransporters
AT paoloruggerone molecularrationalebehindthedifferentialsubstratespecificityofbacterialrndmultidrugtransporters
_version_ 1718388947767263232