Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators
Abstract Background Effective clinical reasoning is a core competency of health professionals that is necessary to assure patients’ safety. Unfortunately, adoption of longitudinal clinical reasoning curricula is still infrequent. This study explores the barriers that hinder the explicit teaching of...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Małgorzata Sudacka, Martin Adler, Steven J. Durning, Samuel Edelbring, Ada Frankowska, Daniel Hartmann, Inga Hege, Sören Huwendiek, Monika Sobočan, Nils Thiessen, Felicitas L. Wagner, Andrzej A. Kononowicz |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3b05ddc02832415d8b81f1bf3431ba62 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical Reasoning Needs to Be Explicitly Addressed in Health Professions Curricula: Recommendations from a European Consortium
por: Ioannis Parodis, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Norm as an exclusionary reason for action
por: Hadži Stević Brano
Publicado: (2021) -
Implementation of a Hypothesis-Driven Physical Exam Session in a Transition to Clerkship Program
por: Julia Kelly, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
por: Jennifer Schellinger, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Teaching Diagnostic Reasoning to Faculty Using an Assessment for Learning Tool: Training the Trainer
por: Adam Cohen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)