EVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION

It should firstly be noted that this study, which was initially not constructed as a research article, is grounded on personal impressions acquired in the academic world over years. The purpose of this study is to reveal quantitative and qualitative studies published in Turkey. To this end, the stud...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Ufuk ORHAN
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2019
Materias:	quantitative design qualitative design positivism postpositivism organisational behaviour congre Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3feb02f5ee67460ab4c9142f45f437ce
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3feb02f5ee67460ab4c9142f45f437ce
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3feb02f5ee67460ab4c9142f45f437ce2021-11-24T09:20:39ZEVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION2148-416310.9761/JASSS7843https://doaj.org/article/3feb02f5ee67460ab4c9142f45f437ce2019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=1347503454_27-Dr.%20%C3%96%C4%9Fr.%20%C3%9Cyesi%20Ufuk%20Orhan.pdf&key=28948https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163It should firstly be noted that this study, which was initially not constructed as a research article, is grounded on personal impressions acquired in the academic world over years. The purpose of this study is to reveal quantitative and qualitative studies published in Turkey. To this end, the study used five-years data based on research designs, methods and analyzes to discuss why the positivist tradition ignores the qualitative research design. It does not intend to put a blame on positivism. On the contrary, it discusses, though briefly, the reasons for positivist tradition’s ignoring qualitative design, valued by positivism. The study does not have a specific theoretical basis. Thus, it should be mentioned that the study does not aim to “see”, but to “look”. The sample consisted of 490 papers presented in Turkish organizational behavior congresses. The study used document analysis and percentage and revealed the course of studies. The analysis results showed that quantitative research composes 8% of the total papers. The papers based on quantitative research design, which are already limited in number, include content analysis studies, case studies, and phenomenology studies but include no ethnographic research, grounded theory research, and narrative inquiry. Gradual increase in the number of qualitative studies is regarded as a positive development. We think that this will cause the quality of qualitative studies to be questioned in the course of time. Therefore, the study recommends qualitative studies not to be interpreted from a positivist perspective.Ufuk ORHANFırat Universityarticlequantitative designqualitative designpositivismpostpositivismorganisational behaviour congreSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 11, Iss 72, Pp 433-445 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	quantitative design qualitative design positivism postpositivism organisational behaviour congre Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	quantitative design qualitative design positivism postpositivism organisational behaviour congre Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Ufuk ORHAN EVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION
description	It should firstly be noted that this study, which was initially not constructed as a research article, is grounded on personal impressions acquired in the academic world over years. The purpose of this study is to reveal quantitative and qualitative studies published in Turkey. To this end, the study used five-years data based on research designs, methods and analyzes to discuss why the positivist tradition ignores the qualitative research design. It does not intend to put a blame on positivism. On the contrary, it discusses, though briefly, the reasons for positivist tradition’s ignoring qualitative design, valued by positivism. The study does not have a specific theoretical basis. Thus, it should be mentioned that the study does not aim to “see”, but to “look”. The sample consisted of 490 papers presented in Turkish organizational behavior congresses. The study used document analysis and percentage and revealed the course of studies. The analysis results showed that quantitative research composes 8% of the total papers. The papers based on quantitative research design, which are already limited in number, include content analysis studies, case studies, and phenomenology studies but include no ethnographic research, grounded theory research, and narrative inquiry. Gradual increase in the number of qualitative studies is regarded as a positive development. We think that this will cause the quality of qualitative studies to be questioned in the course of time. Therefore, the study recommends qualitative studies not to be interpreted from a positivist perspective.
format	article
author	Ufuk ORHAN
author_facet	Ufuk ORHAN
author_sort	Ufuk ORHAN
title	EVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION
title_short	EVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION
title_full	EVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION
title_fullStr	EVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION
title_full_unstemmed	EVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION
title_sort	evaluating the reflection of quantitative and qualitative research designs in management studies and the ignorance of the qualitative design by the positivist tradition
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/3feb02f5ee67460ab4c9142f45f437ce
work_keys_str_mv	AT ufukorhan evaluatingthereflectionofquantitativeandqualitativeresearchdesignsinmanagementstudiesandtheignoranceofthequalitativedesignbythepositivisttradition
_version_	1718415666122326016

EVALUATING THE REFLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE QUALITATIVE DESIGN BY THE POSITIVIST TRADITION

Ejemplares similares