Integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis

Introductory mechanics is an obligatory course for many disciplines outside of physics and the failure rate is often high. Even the students who pass the course often fail to achieve the main learning goal: The conceptual knowledge required for modeling situations with physics principles. In many ca...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vegard Gjerde, Bodil Holst, Stein Dankert Kolstø
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4816efffa1c545fc99960193c12a0234
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4816efffa1c545fc99960193c12a0234
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4816efffa1c545fc99960193c12a02342021-12-02T14:22:02ZIntegrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.0101242469-9896https://doaj.org/article/4816efffa1c545fc99960193c12a02342021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010124http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010124https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896Introductory mechanics is an obligatory course for many disciplines outside of physics and the failure rate is often high. Even the students who pass the course often fail to achieve the main learning goal: The conceptual knowledge required for modeling situations with physics principles. In many cases, this is due to inefficient learning strategies. However, little work has been done on the integration of learning strategies into physics courses. Here we present a study where we integrated three established learning strategies into the teaching of an introductory mechanics course: elaborative encoding, retrieval practice, and self-explanation. We also developed three scaffolding tools to facilitate the integration of the strategies: elaborative encoding questions, a hierarchical principle structure, and a problem-solution structure with emphasis on physics modeling. The overarching aim of this study is to use students’ experience-based reflections to find ways to improve the integration of the learning strategies. To fulfill this aim, we seek answers to the following three interrelated research questions: (i) What are the students’ experiences and associated reflections with the learning strategies and tools? (ii) How do the students’ experiences and reflections align with established theory on the learning strategies? (iii) What main barriers to effective implementation of the learning strategies may be hypothesized? To answer these questions, we did semi-structured research interviews with 12 students. Through the thematic analysis, we found that retrieval practice was used extensively while self-explanation and elaborative encoding was partly or wholly ignored. The analysis, together with theoretical considerations, indicates that successful implementation of elaborative encoding is critical for maximizing the benefits from retrieval practice in physics. We also present some promising findings on two of the tools: (i) Students’ extensive use of the hierarchical principle structure and (ii) that some students started practicing physics modeling after exposure to the solution structure. Finally, we offer suggestions for how to overcome the barriers to effective implementation of each of the learning strategies.Vegard GjerdeBodil HolstStein Dankert KolstøAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 17, Iss 1, p 010124 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Vegard Gjerde
Bodil Holst
Stein Dankert Kolstø
Integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis
description Introductory mechanics is an obligatory course for many disciplines outside of physics and the failure rate is often high. Even the students who pass the course often fail to achieve the main learning goal: The conceptual knowledge required for modeling situations with physics principles. In many cases, this is due to inefficient learning strategies. However, little work has been done on the integration of learning strategies into physics courses. Here we present a study where we integrated three established learning strategies into the teaching of an introductory mechanics course: elaborative encoding, retrieval practice, and self-explanation. We also developed three scaffolding tools to facilitate the integration of the strategies: elaborative encoding questions, a hierarchical principle structure, and a problem-solution structure with emphasis on physics modeling. The overarching aim of this study is to use students’ experience-based reflections to find ways to improve the integration of the learning strategies. To fulfill this aim, we seek answers to the following three interrelated research questions: (i) What are the students’ experiences and associated reflections with the learning strategies and tools? (ii) How do the students’ experiences and reflections align with established theory on the learning strategies? (iii) What main barriers to effective implementation of the learning strategies may be hypothesized? To answer these questions, we did semi-structured research interviews with 12 students. Through the thematic analysis, we found that retrieval practice was used extensively while self-explanation and elaborative encoding was partly or wholly ignored. The analysis, together with theoretical considerations, indicates that successful implementation of elaborative encoding is critical for maximizing the benefits from retrieval practice in physics. We also present some promising findings on two of the tools: (i) Students’ extensive use of the hierarchical principle structure and (ii) that some students started practicing physics modeling after exposure to the solution structure. Finally, we offer suggestions for how to overcome the barriers to effective implementation of each of the learning strategies.
format article
author Vegard Gjerde
Bodil Holst
Stein Dankert Kolstø
author_facet Vegard Gjerde
Bodil Holst
Stein Dankert Kolstø
author_sort Vegard Gjerde
title Integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis
title_short Integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis
title_full Integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis
title_fullStr Integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis
title_sort integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: a thematic analysis
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4816efffa1c545fc99960193c12a0234
work_keys_str_mv AT vegardgjerde integratingeffectivelearningstrategiesinbasicphysicslecturesathematicanalysis
AT bodilholst integratingeffectivelearningstrategiesinbasicphysicslecturesathematicanalysis
AT steindankertkolstø integratingeffectivelearningstrategiesinbasicphysicslecturesathematicanalysis
_version_ 1718391483819622400